User talk:Cerebellum/Archive 1

Timely creations
Really good work on those Golden Age superheroes. When you are done it might be worth adding them into the character section at Timely Comics. If you have any ideas about where The Twelve (comic) might fit in there let me know (feel free to drop a note in on the Timely talk page in the section I added). (Emperor 02:10, 17 August 2007 (UTC))


 * No problem -the important thing is those entries got off to such a good start. It'll make it easier for people to chip in and add details where they can. The important thing is to make sure they new entries are properly linked in from other places. I'm just going to disambiguate Mister E (a move would be tricky as it has a lot of incoming links but this'll be a start). (Emperor 16:25, 17 August 2007 (UTC))

Userboxes
I noticed your main page mentioned you'd like some more userboxes. I think this would help you when your collection gets big. Also, feel free to use any of mine if you like (you already snagged one!). If you decide to start making them, use the template (colors you can use). Userboxes are something I recently discovered myself, they're a fun way to express yourself. bahamut0013 ( ♠♣§ ) 17:35, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I suppose not, especially since they've been put in the public galleries. I would ask if it's a unique one that isn't posted in the galleries, the userbox talk, userbox ideas, or the new userbox pages, because then the author might not expect it to be used (especially if it seems very personal). Mine, however, are all up for grabs, and I keep making new ones, so you can check my gallery as often as you like. Also, you should sign when you edit a talk page. You can do this by adding four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of your posts. bahamut0013 ( ♠♣§ ) 22:19, 17 August 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Do Hard Things
A tag has been placed on Do Hard Things, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g11.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Peripitus (Talk) 00:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

The Rebelution
A template has been added to the article The Rebelution, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. -- WebHamste r  00:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)


 * The whole article has to demonstrate notability per either WP:N or WP:ORG. I had a quick Google for this movement after you deleted the prod tag (which you shouldn't have done until you were in a position to supply the sources etc) and there are plenty of sources out there. Reading the above articles should give you a head start. I rather doubt you'll manage the same for the book though.  WebHamste r  01:24, 16 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Yup, that will stop the article being speedily deleted but it won't stop an WP:AFD. You need to do lots more work to make it an acceptable article. I've marked a couple of things you'll need right off.  WebHamste r  01:48, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Rohrbaugh R9.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Rohrbaugh R9.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:23, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject Firearms
Welcome to the WikiProject Firearms. I hope you enjoy being a member.--LWF (talk) 13:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Asimov template
In my attempts at some cleanup and organization, what do you think about this? &mdash;ScouterSig 20:02, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Storm Shadow 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Storm Shadow 1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:StormShadow 07.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:StormShadow 07.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Storm Shadow 1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Storm Shadow 1.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:31, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Formation and evolution of the Solar System
Hi. I have read the talk page (where you say you will not get involved in editing) and the article on the nebular hypothesis. You want to "silence the creationists", but that just plays into their hands. I want to let the creationists hoist themselves with their own petard. Be that as it may, the talk page section you refer to has only one comment in it, yours, and therefore represents no consensus. The disclaimer you included goes for all science and goes without saying. --Milkbreath (talk) 13:47, 7 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Oh. I'm an idiot. Keep your hands and feet clear of moving blade. --Milkbreath (talk) 14:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Hou Tu
Thank you for creating Hou Tu! Cheers, Kingturtle (talk) 03:40, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Unwatched

 * 1) 1/2 (Half Thang) ‎
 * 2) 10.4 cm Feldkanone M. 15 ‎
 * 3) 10.5 cm Leichtgeschütz 40 ‎
 * 4) 10.5 cm Leichtgeschütz 42 ‎
 * 5) 10.5 cm leFH 18/40 ‎
 * 6) 12 String Guitar! Vol. 2 ‎
 * 7) 1471 (Horwich) Squadron ATC ‎
 * 8) 1498 in literature ‎
 * 9) 14N ‎
 * 10) 14 Sagittae ‎
 * 11) 14th Airlift Squadron (Poland) ‎
 * 12) 14th Chess Olympiad ‎
 * 13) 14th General Assembly of Nova Scotia ‎
 * 14) 14th General Assembly of Prince Edward Island ‎
 * 15) 14th Light Horse Regiment ‎
 * 16) 14th Maine Volunteer Infantry Regiment ‎
 * 17) 14th New Brunswick Legislative Assembly ‎
 * 18) 14th Soap Opera Digest Awards ‎
 * 19) 14th Street Crosstown Line (surface) ‎
 * 20) 14th Tony Awards ‎
 * 21) 14th Yamaha Thailand Cup ‎
 * 22) 15-Minute Hamlet ‎
 * 23) 15-hydroxyprostaglandin-D dehydrogenase (NADP+) ‎
 * 24) 15-hydroxyprostaglandin-I dehydrogenase (NADP+) ‎
 * 25) 15-oxoprostaglandin 13-oxidase ‎
 * 26) 1501 McGill College ‎
 * 27) 1507 Little York building ‎
 * 28) 1529 in literature ‎
 * 29) 1546 in Ireland ‎
 * 30) 1551 in Ireland ‎
 * 31) 1552 in music ‎
 * 32) 1562 in literature ‎
 * 33) 1595 in India ‎
 * 34) 15 Años De Éxitos ‎
 * 35) 15 Exitos ‎
 * 36) 15 Saint Bridget Prayers ‎
 * 37) 15 Years Deep ‎
 * 38) 15 cm Autokanone M. 15/16 ‎
 * 39) 15 cm schwere Feldhaubitze M. 15 ‎
 * 40) 15th Chess Olympiad ‎
 * 41) 15th General Assembly of Nova Scotia ‎
 * 42) 15th General Assembly of Prince Edward Island ‎
 * 43) 15th New Brunswick Legislative Assembly ‎
 * 44) 15th SAARC summit ‎
 * 45) 15th Soap Opera Digest Awards ‎
 * 46) 15th Tony Awards ‎
 * 47) 16-alpha-hydroxyprogesterone dehydratase ‎
 * 48) 16-alpha-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase ‎
 * 49) 16/1-L ‎
 * 50) 1600 Pacific Tower ‎
 * 51) 1601 Vine St (Office Tower) ‎

John Reaves 05:09, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVI (February 2009)
The February 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:42, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Nominations for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 13 March! This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 18:22, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. We will be selecting coordinators from a pool of eighteen to serve for the next six months. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on Saturday, 28 March! Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:25, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXVII (March 2009)
The March 2009 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:09, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

G.I. Joe
Would you look at Snake-Eyes page at the bottom you'll find a section labeled 2009 film with a movie plot could i get your opinion whether the movie plot should be their like that or deleted because some IP keeps deleting it The Movie Master 1 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:26, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

WP:NODRAMA reminder
Thanks for signing up for the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Wikipedia stands to benefit from the improvements in the article space as a result of this campaign. This is a double reminder. First, the campaign begins on July 18, 2009 at 00:00 (UTC). Second, please remember to log any articles you have worked on during the campaign at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/Log. Thanks again for your participation! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 21:17, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for making WP:NODRAMA a success!
Thank you again for your support of the Great Wikipedia Dramaout. Preliminary statistics indicate that 129 new articles were created, 203 other articles were improved, and 183 images were uploaded. Additionally, 41 articles were nominated for DYK, of which at least 2 have already been promoted. There are currently also 8 articles up for GA status and 3 up for FA/FL status. Though the campaign is technically over, please continue to update the log page at WP:NODRAMA/L with any articles which you worked during the campaign, and also to note any that receive commendation, such as DYK, GA or FA status. You may find the following links helpful in nominating your work:


 * T:TDYK for Did You Know nominations
 * WP:GAC for Good Article nominations
 * WP:FAC for Featured Article nominations
 * WP:FLC for Featured List nominations
 * WP:FPC for Featured Picture nominations

Again, thank you for making this event a success! --Jayron32. talk . say no to drama 02:11, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Robert Atkins.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Robert Atkins.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Peripitus (Talk) 03:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

G.I. Joe Project conventions
Hi. I'm asking all project members to participate in this discussion. Thanks!--Flash176 (soon to be rechristened as Ridge Runner) (talk) 05:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Up Country
A tag has been placed on Up Country requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Makeemlighter (talk) 15:55, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

Nominations open for the Military history WikiProject coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 12 September! Many thanks,  Roger Davies  talk 04:24, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Military history coordinator elections: voting has started!
Voting in the Military history WikiProject coordinator election has now started. The aim is to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months from a pool of sixteen candidates. Please vote here by 23:59 (UTC) on 26 September! For the coordinators,  Roger Davies  talk 22:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the Barnstar
Thanks :) Jim101 (talk) 02:56, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
 * You might want to submit Battle of Onjong for DYK now... Jim101 (talk) 03:22, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * FYI, I found a good hook and submitted a DYK in your name. Jim101 (talk) 16:36, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Dont worry...
Don't worry about the heat you are taking about the Google Watch DRV. It is a sensitive area, and some people get very aggressive about anything related to Daniel Brandt. --Apoc2400 (talk) 11:42, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the note! A merge really is a pretty reasonable solution, so I'm not too worried, and I expected to take a little flack; I'm just lucky Brandt doesn't have me up on Hivemind yet.  I intend to make sure that all of the information from the article is included in the page, and then go back to my former practice of avoiding any page with a "Wikipedia" prefix.  Cheers!  Cerebellum (talk) 14:34, 12 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Of course, I suppose I could follow WP:ND3 and start posting messages on people's talk pages, but something tells me that that wouldn't go over too well. ; ) Cerebellum (talk) 15:35, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Agriculture in South Africa
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Agriculture in South Africa, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://countrystudies.us/south-africa/67.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

GA review
Thank you for helping out with reviewing GANs, we do need all of the help we can get! You chose a quality first article to begin with, and helps easing into reviewing much easier. I don't see any glaring issues that would prevent the article from being a GA, so good job with your review. Usually, when I start with a particular topic, I look to see what WikiProjects the article falls under. I go to those pages and see if they have any MOS or article guidelines, to determine if the article is missing any vital pieces or is conflicting with formats established by consensus. I would definitely recommend looking to those in the future. GAs don't have to be perfect and meet every MOS, but they also shouldn't ignore how other similar articles are formatted or how they cover various areas of information. Keep up the good work, and if you have any questions about future reviews, you can look to the instruction pages listed at WP:GAN, or leave me a message and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

The Great Wikipedia Dramaout
Hi! As you have expressed an interest in the initial The Great Wikipedia Dramaout, you're being notified because we are currently planning another one in January! We hope to have an even greater level of participation this time around, and we need your help. If you're still interested please sign up now at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd. Thanks, and Happy Holidays! JCbot (talk) 04:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

WP:NODRAMA/2
Just a quick reminder that the Second Great Wikipedia Dramaout has begun. Please log any work you do at The Great Wikipedia Dramaout/2nd/Log. Good luck! -- Jayron  32  01:40, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion/Electric Retard (2nd nomination)
Hi, Cerebellum. Because you participated in Deletion review/Log/2010 February 7, you may be interested in Articles for deletion/Electric Retard (2nd nomination). Cunard (talk) 11:23, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Nominations for the March 2010 Military history Project Coordinator elections now open!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator selection process has started; to elect the coordinators to serve for the next six months. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 (UTC) on 8 March 2010! More information on coordinatorship may be found on the coordinator academy course and in the responsibilities section on the coordinator page. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Coordinator elections have opened!
Voting for the Military history WikiProject coordinator elections has opened; all users are encouraged to participate in the elections. Voting will conclude 23:59 (UTC) on 28 March 2010. This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 21:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Masters of the Universe mass merger discussion
I saw your proposal on Wiki toys project about Masters of the Universe I have initiated a discussion at Talk:List of Masters of the Universe characters so feel free to discuss improvements at the talk page. Dwanyewest (talk) 19:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

GiJoe interviews you found, I copied to the Joe Wikipedia

 * I saw your post on the GiJoe Wikiproject, and went ahead and made a page on the GiJoe Wikipedia to include that information. http://gijoe.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_interviews Good work.  D r e a m Focus  17:01, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I'm glad you found them useful.  --Cerebellum (talk) 19:14, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Action Force etc
Not something I've indexed, but I'll dig out anything I have from your list - I have most of the Marvel Ages that haven't been scanned - and have a look at that online list for anything I've got. Give me a few days. I suggest I scan and e-mail to you - to save you publicising your contact details, drop me an e-mail, the address is at the top of my page exactly for that sort of thing. I'll also bear the 'Joe family' in mind as I riffle through stuff in the future, and let you know of anything I find (thinks - must get my brother to dig out that box of Action Man stuff he kept when I left home all those centuries ago). Cheers! Archiveangel (talk) 07:11, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

G.I. Joe Question
I need to ask you a question... how well do you know the world of G.I. Joe? NamelessConsular (talk) 10:44, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'd like to think that I know it reasonably well, though of course there are many people who know it better than I. Why do you ask?  --Cerebellum (talk) 19:06, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, this is about the Scarlett relationship thing, right? I'll post my thoughts at the Scarlett talk page.  --Cerebellum (talk) 12:31, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Peter Schiff RfC
Hi Cerebellum, Thank you for your participation and cool head on the "economist" controversy. RfC is a good idea but I think eventually it will need to go to Meditation. But let's see. Meantime I suggest you create a new section on the Schiff talk page (at the bottom) and place the RfC tag there. Also I would suggest you place a very short summary of the two sides of the argument. Currently you have the RfC tag waaaayyyy up :-) at the top of the discussion and no RfC person is going to want to read all that stuff (including the name calling etc) and will, in my opinion, not yield any RfC participants. If you like, I can set up the new section. But I didn't want to step on your toes. So let me know how you'd like to proceed. I am happy to back off if you disagree with what I have said above. Thanks dude! -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 19:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 19:26, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Dramaout
See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:The_Great_Wikipedia_Dramaout/3rd#Participating_Wikipedians

and also a mention on WP:ANI. I would love to have you participate! Remember July 5th, the starting date! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 15:14, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

The Milhist election has started!
The Military history WikiProject coordinator election has started. You are cordially invited to help pick fourteen new coordinators from a pool of twenty candidates. This time round, the term has increased from six to twelve months so it is doubly important that you have your say! Please cast your vote here no later than 23:59 (UTC) on Tuesday, 28 September 2010.

With many thanks in advance for your participation from the coordinator team,  Roger Davies  talk 21:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

ANI
Please be aware that your username was mentioned at an ANI discussion, at Formidable.heart: attempted consensus manipulation by altering other editors' entries at AfD]] —Edison (talk) 02:53, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
I nominated your article for DYK, and the reviewer has some concerns with it. Thought your input might help. :) The Bushranger One ping only 20:33, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

DYK for Congo Free State campaign against the Arabo-Swahilis
Materialscientist (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Hispano-Suiza HS.404
I see you just rated Hispano-Suiza HS.404 as a Start-article. What would be your recommendations for improving it to (let's say) B-status? It is a somewhat narrow area, and I haven't found much sources beyond those already cited. Petter Bøckman (talk) 08:22, 16 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your feedback! I have now sourced the chapters lacking citations as per your suggestion. I'm afraid I had to use Chinn's 1951 book for most of it, the book is rather comprehensive though (and available online). There are a couple of paragraphs that is still without reference, simply because a single reference to Chinn covers the whole chapter. I would very much apprechiate if you could have a look at it when you have the time. Petter Bøckman (talk) 10:42, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

SysIQ
Hello. I've been trying to get my Article approved for a while and concluded that I might need a little more help then just a standard review answer. My page is not going through because the editors are not finding it notable enough. I've read through Wiki's policies and rules and edited my text several times so it would perfectly comply with each and every requirement. Still at no avail. I'm looking at several articles like mine and can't figure out why they are published and mine is declined. Please advise on what else I can do improve the situation. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Godzhesas (talk • contribs) 15:05, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Regarding Charlie Zelenoff
Hello sir. Aren't the links/sources i posted on the Charlie Z page enough? Charlie Zelenoff is famous in the boxing community. He's even famous in the mixed martial arts community. I'm not sure if youtube links are acceptable, but his youtube video fight against Mayweather has almost 300k views. Isn't that enough for him to have a wiki page? Cheers.

Eugene Zelenova —Preceding undated comment added 04:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC).

Thanks for your reply. Never actually seen Mayweather's page but I guess his mention as it is on that page is enough. I checked out the rules again and you're right, Charlie's only claim to fame is his brawl with Mayweather Sr. and the rules states that that is not enough. Thanks again, Cerebellum. Cheers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eugene zelenova (talk • contribs) 04:17, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Finding Highly Composite Numbers
Hi Cerebellum. Thanks for your supportive comments about my (first) article. When I wrote it, I did not realise just how strict Wikipedia is. I have looked up the various links to Wikipedia rules which were included in the deletion discussion and it is quite clear that the article infringes on the rules about original research. And while some of this work (possibly all of it) has been done independently elsewhere, I have also done it independently. I have had an interest in highly composite numbers for two decades and first implemented the successive prime factors algorithm for finding them about nine years ago. At that time I was not even aware of the term "highly composite numbers" let alone the research of other people into those numbers. I am a professional computer programmer, not an academic, so I don't see myself being able to comply with all the requirements for references and citations. Therefore my first Wikipedia article will probably also be my last.

Thanks for your suggestion about Wikibooks. Once the discussion about my article has run its course, I'll probably explore this further.

Torkel1001 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 22:36, 11 February 2011 (UTC).

Gilbert Cory
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gilbert Cory, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.coryfamsoc.com/john1/john1/b619.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:02, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Gilbert Cory
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Gilbert Cory, a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 15:05, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics)
The article G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero (Marvel Comics) for things which need to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:23, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

SLQ new pages
Thanks for your contribution to the SLQ collaboration in February. See commons:Commons:State Library of Queensland/Reports/2 (and the intro at the top). -- John Vandenberg (chat) 08:12, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

Arashikage
I found and restored Arashikage, if there is anything you can do to source and fix that article. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 22:52, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) 129.33.19.254 (talk) 14:43, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Looking much better! The Ninja Force characters could use an expansion as well, if you can find the time. 129.33.19.254 (talk) 16:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

G.I. Joe: ARAH toy lists
Howdy, would you mind taking a quick look at these pages to make sure I'm on the right track? Also have a few questions that need addressing in their respective talk pages. Also debating whether it would be better to do them in tabular format, similar to the Characters article. Thanks! -- Jake fuersturm (talk) 13:16, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
 * List of G.I. Joe vehicles
 * User:Jake fuersturm/List of G.I. Joe: A Real American Hero playsets

Talkback
Jake fuersturm (talk) 15:26, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Jake Fuersturm (talk) 11:23, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Raintheone
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Requests for comment/Raintheone regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. If you have the time, please participate by reviewing the summary that has been prepared, and giving your opinion as to what can be done. Thank you! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:10, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:StormShadow 07.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:StormShadow 07.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:36, 28 April 2011 (UTC)

Grant Morrison photo
Hi. Your opinion on what would be the best photo for the Infobox in the Grant Morrison article is requested here. If you could take the time to participate, it would be greatly appreciated, but if you cannot, then disregard; you don't have to leave a note on my talk page either way. Nightscream (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVI, August 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 17:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

cats before stub tags
Hi, re this edit: categories go before stub tags - see WP:FOOTERS for the full list of end matter for an article. Thanks. Pam D  22:29, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Thank you for telling me! I'll be more careful in the future.  Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 15:31, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space
Hey there Cerebellum, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Cerebellum/Sandbox.


 * See a log of files removed today here.
 * Shut off the bot here.
 * Report errors here.
 * If you have any questions, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about John McLeish
Hello, Cerebellum, and thanks for contributing to Wikipedia!

I wanted to let you know that some editors are discussing at Articles for deletion/John McLeish whether the article John McLeish should be in Wikipedia. I encourage you to comment there if you think the article should be kept in the encyclopedia.

The deletion discussion doesn't mean you did something wrong. In fact, other editors may have useful suggestions on how you can continue editing and improving John McLeish, which I encourage you to do. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Help Desk.

Thanks again for your contributions! Jenks24 (talk) 13:36, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Wittgenstein
thanks very much, have addressed your comments which are very good, and made notes on the review page. please let me know what you think Tom B (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
 * yes probably needs one, may take a while Tom B (talk) 17:48, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Nurkse says hello!
Hi, thank you so much for reviewing the Ragnar Nurkse's balanced growth theory article. I made the changes you asked for. :) I have a small doubt, which I have posted on the GA review page. Please help with that, if possible. Regards - Abhilasha369 (talk) 13:31, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Scarlett (G.I. Joe)
Hey, I'm sure that you are busy, but I have started to significantly cleanup the article Scarlett (G.I. Joe). I noticed some of your comments on the talk page, so if you have a chance, please check it out and let me know what you think. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:49, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

Barnstar
Awesome, thanks! :) --Cerebellum (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

AfD and PROD
Howdy Cerebellum. Back in November, you got either an AfD or PROD notification and it was during one of the template testing project's experiments. If you could go here and leave us some feedback about what you think about the new versions of the templates we tested (1, 2), that would be very useful. (You can also email me at swalling@undefinedwikimedia.org if you want.) Thanks! Steven Walling (WMF) • talk   23:19, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Swordfish Translation Editor
You asked for the deletion of the page. I’ve edited it to improve it. Do you think it is fine now? Should I put a list of supported format like in the page on Web Translate It? Spray&#38;Pray (talk) 00:47, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Google
I get 113 million hits running your exact search. What do you get running mine? -- Eraserhead1 &lt;talk&gt; 22:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Editing Harifal
M.A.Harifal. 16:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Thanks, Mr. Cerebellum for helping improve my article 'Harifal' in terms of editing, cohesion etc, but I would also like to bring in your kind notice that following your editing a technical error has occurred in reference section at serial number 4,could u help in rectifying.I hope you will continue helping me in future too, so that I could improve it.M.A.Harifal. 16:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)

New Page Triage engagement strategy released
Hey guys!

I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the initial documentation about the project and also the engagement strategy, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on my talkpage, or in my inbox -.

It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :). Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 02:22, 3 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
 Wifione  Message 05:36, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Exodus
I invite you to comment on Talk:The_Exodus.Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 05:41, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Heya
Thanks for your review of Clement of Alexandria. I'm ultimately looking at getting these articles on Eastern church fathers to FA standard, but it'll be some time (wanna GA them all first!) - your suggestions will help ! --23.20.130.229 (talk) 21:31, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * PS - Clement's thought on theological issues can be hard to define (although on moral/societal issues he normally has a clear viewpoint), especially as his "secret" theology is markedly different from that found in the trilogy. I therefore found it much easier to write about the contents of his works, and thus give the reader a sense of his theology. You're right that a summary could be useful - perhaps before the works section ? --23.20.130.229 (talk) 21:58, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I enjoyed reviewing the article, I don't know much about Eastern church history and it's always a pleasure to learn more. :) Right now I'm working to improve articles related to the works of John the Evangelist, but when I get through with that I'll see what I can do to help you out.  I agree that the "Theological works" section gives a pretty comprehensive view of his theology, but since it's so detailed a summary section would help place the commentary on the works in context.  I think a "Theology" section could include info on his moral and societal views, plus separate descriptions of his secret and traditional theology.  If I understand things correctly, people sometimes attribute ideas to Clement which are not his own, i.e. the Mar Saba letter, so I guess you have to be careful about what you say. Whatever you end up doing, the article is a great addition to Wikipedia and I wish you all the best as you continue working :).  Thanks, --Cerebellum (talk) 22:59, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

the exodus

 * Discussion on the exodus talk page will only go so far. Why don't you make some edits to the article?Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 18:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Baptism in the Holy Spirit
Thanks for reviewing the article and all the suggestions! Ltwin (talk) 23:18, 17 March 2012 (UTC)

Lisa Marie Presley Storm & Grace
Hi thanks for the input but the Storm & Grace page is now redirected back to Lisa Marie Presley page. Curious why that would be?JGG59 (talk) 19:03, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

AFC
Thanks, I'll do what I can. :) --Cerebellum (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Oh by the way: Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Harry Tindall - don't decline because of WP:MOS! This is not a valid reason! Either find a better reason, or move it and fix it or tag it (in this case with wikify). mabdul 20:24, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Whoops, I've changed the rationale, the article seems to rely on sources which are affiliated with the subject. Thanks for letting me know. --Cerebellum (talk) 20:45, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

conservation-restoration of Silver
I just read your edit and really don't understand it. You cite the problem as being that it reads like a personal essay, yet it is well sourced and basically empty of personal opinion. Please elaborate about it on the talk page or where appropriate. It seems your review was done with some haste--RichardMcCoy (talk) 21:32, 18 March 2012 (UTC).
 * We cleaned up this article as you suggested but got another oblique review of it. This process seems flawed.--RichardMcCoy (talk) 01:07, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Article for creation "Interstate river Water Disputes Act"
Dear Cerebellam,

You stated that comments are given on content of requested article for creation on 18 March, 2012. Sufficient inline references were already given. I could not find any other comment. Please clarify. Your reference in meesage to me is given below.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Kwdt2&diff=0&oldid=477587760 for all changes since your last visit. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kwdt2 for the current revision.

Kwdt2 (talk) 04:42, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Re Article for Creation about Bernadette Davis
Hi Cerebellum, thanks for re-reviewing my article for Creation on Bernadette Davis. I wasn't quite sure what the new comments you had added to the article - was it just reiterating Nolelover's comments that I need to prove the notability and significance of Bernadette Davis? The problem I have is that most of her work was in the 'pre-internet reviews' era: I have trawled the net looking for articles, quotes, reviews etc. from sources considered valid, but she was most actively writing in the mid- to late-90s when there wasn't the same amount of information available on the internet - I guess most of the articles and reviews back then would have been paper based. She then retired for a while to have a family but is now back with a new upcoming comedy series on BBC 3 (see my links!) The sitcom 'Game On' was a huge hit at the end of the 90s (described as part of the zeitgeist that came to define a generation" and as a "sitcom that was so of its time, that it took its name from a catchphrase of the decade" (Yorkshire Post, Interview with Matthew Cottle, one of the 3 main stars, along with Sam Janus, now on Eastenders, and Ben Chaplin, now in Hollywood) - and it rightly has its own page on Wikipedia.  However, all the acclaim and attention seems to have gone to Andrew Davies, and hardly any to Bernadette Davis (no relation) - the most heinous example of which is on the BBC Comedy website itself (http://www.bbc.co.uk/comedy/gameon/) which says Andrew Davies co-wrote it - but doesn't say who the other co-writer is!!  So I thought it was only right to reset the balance, so to speak, by at least giving her her due on Wikipedia. I have tried to post as many links and references as I can to her output, but because of the times (just before the internet really took off info-wise) there just isn't that much available. And actually the article's references are now longer than the article! My main arguments for her deserving of a page of her own are that, as "Game On" is very famous, and has a place on Wikipedia, she deserves to be on it too, as the co-writer (and the sole writer for the 3rd series!) After all, you couldn't have just a page on Jagger without one about Richards, or Ant without Dec, or Mitchell without Webb, or, er, Rod Hull without Emu! :-) So, she is significant as being responsible for something significant!  Please let me know what you think.  Yours, PaukiPKK (talk) 10:46, 19 March 2012 (UTC)PaukiPKK Hi Cerebellum, thanks for your response to my last response - I will go to my local library and see if they have anything paper-based that could become the missing link that I am after (the source that will tie it all together) - and after that - win or lose - I'll move it to 'live' and see if it gets marked for deletion, or, as sometimes happens, someone else adds some stuff to it that solidifies the argument!  Thanks for your time and consideration.  I may come back to you in the future about your offer of the editing (tho I'm feeling a little jaded at the moment, I must admit!), though not quite at the moment.  212.95.227.74 (talk) 13:10, 20 March 2012 (UTC)PaukiPKK Hi Cerebellum, I have added some more references to the list of official references for Bernadette Davis. All three mention that she was the co-author of 'Game On'. The first (and first in the list of refs) is her being listed as co-writer with Andrew Davis in a Manchester University Press critical appraisal of AD's Television work. The last two, 13 & 14 are about her upcoming comedy 'Some Girls', which is coming out in November (next month). One of them is a report from the Media Guardian Edinburgh TV Festival in which the BBC3 executives say it shouldn't be likened to a 'female inbetweeners', which means others have seen similarities. I dare say when the show actually airs there will be more articles on it too, should this now not be enough. I hope it is. Just give me the nod and I'll resubmit it. Yours, Paul K. PaukiPKK (talk) 11:35, 12 October 2012 (UTC)PaukiPKK Hi Cerebellum, thanks for the message & advice - I'll resubmit (and add any new info when the show comes out!), Yours, Paul K. PaukiPKK (talk) 09:14, 16 October 2012 (UTC)PaukiPKK

Review of Article
Hi Cerebellum, Thank you for your review of the proposed Adam Joinson article and thank you for your comments. It appears that the notability is an issue. I'm new to wikipedia and i'm unsure as to what this actually means. I've read the notability guidelines wikipedia have produced however, i'm still uncertain as to the types of sources that are needed. If you could suggest any types of sources that would help with this issue, they would be very appriciated. Thanks SarahAStewart (talk) 12:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

RN Podar page
Hi!

I'm an alumnus of RN Podar school and I understand that the previous article was not quite up to the mark. I do understand that there's a LOT of scope for improvement. Fixed the inline citations and moved unused newspaper articles to 'external links'. I understand the content can be worked upon but most of what's on now has Media references.

Please do see if you think it's wiki-worthy now. Thank you for your time! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Purplesky91 (talk • contribs) 13:41, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Dogeared
HI Cerebellum. Thanks for the edit. I am a little confused regarding the deletion of the recent submission. Almost every statement made has a reliable source. I compared it to other articles that have been submitted such as http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Muse and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rio_Grande_(company) Can you tell me the difference in what was accepted in those articles and the Dogeared one that I submitted?

Any other help would be very useful. Thanks!

Mtheisner (talk) 18:07, 19 March 2012 (UTC)mtheisner

Thanks again Cerebellum for the pointers! I have updated the page. Let me know what you think! Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mtheisner (talk • contribs) 17:47, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

HI again,

It was denied again by Pol430. His reasonings are below. Is it worth even going forward? What do you think?

Hi! Firstly, let me just clarify that the basis for my decline was notability, I am not disputing the accuracy of the information contained in the submission. I forgot to mention the Pittsburgh Post Gazette when I made reference to Seattle Times, I do consider both of those publications to be reliable sources. I could be missing something obvious, but I could not see any mention of 'Dogeared' by name, in the LA Biz journal? Even so, our own article on the LA biz journal reveals it to have a somewhat limited circulation. Generally speaking, when it comes to newspaper, and similar publications, we look for major regional or national dailies to evidence notability. The National Jeweler is an obscure publication to me. There is no definitive list of reliable sources on wikipedia, so reviewers often have to exercise judgement in deciding if a source is reliable; I could not be sure that National Jeweler can be reasonably expected to be so. In order to establish notability, we generally look for significant coverage in a minimum of three, independent, reliable sources. In the case of this submission, I considered that PPG and ST meet those criteria, but I had to dismiss the sources listed above for the reasons I have mentioned. HealtheBay and Standup2Cancer could also not be considered suitable sources for evidencing notability, because they are in partnership with 'Dogeared' and therefore fall short of the requirement to be independent. These concerns notwithstanding, because the article has been previously deleted via a 'deletion discussion' and, due to re-creation', has been indefinitely create protected, it's creation should be discussed at deletion review (follow the instructions at that page for info on how to request a deletion review). If you do request deletion review, be sure to include mention of this discussion and the helpdesk discussion. Hope that helps.

Thanks again for your help Mtheisner (talk) 15:18, 23 March 2012 (UTC)mtheisner

Big Self
Hello, I did an article on Big self that was referenced with Irish times, Hot Press and BBC references amongst others and I don't understand why it wasn't accepted. I have some magazine clippings from the 70's to back up the information how would I cite them as references and if I did would that help the article be submitted. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Big_Self Lorcanmce (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)LorcanmceLorcanmce (talk) 19:21, 19 March 2012 (UTC)

Exodus sandbox
The sandbox version of the exodus article has been moved to Talk:The_Exodus/Draft.Quarkgluonsoup (talk) 16:01, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Hey quark, good to see you back! Thank you for the heads-up; I won't be very active on this stuff for the rest of the week, but I'll try to take a look this weekend and see if there is anything else I can add.  I did a little work on the historicity stuff already, but it remains to be seen if there is consensus for keeping my additions.  Cheers, --Cerebellum (talk) 02:03, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

USA Fuel Sources for Electric Energy
Thanks for you suggestions. Having learned how to do charts in Wiki I wanted to make this entry and then add to it. I will take your suggestions and resubmit. Thanks Queenwe (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eckstein, Karl
Hi! It's Lerysik. You didn't accept my article and suggested:


 * "Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you."

But my resources look like that because the other user advised me doing this:


 * "Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Eckstein, Karl

My article hasn't been accepted again((( I've got the answer that only one of the resources (#2) is independent. But I can't understand why the other sources don't meet the requirements..Please, could you explain it? To my mind they are all independent (of course, I can't think the other way)) There is nothing written by the subject, paid for by the subject. Not his website, and not a press release. And another question: If I leave only one resource (#2), will it be enough? Please, help me.. I'm so exhausted... Maybe you could show me the right example concerning Karl Eckstein?)))) Thanks in advance)) Lerysik (talk) 06:11, 12 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I can see what happened. The reviewing editor had a quick look at the list of sources, saw most of them seemed to be from the Consulate website and declined your article on that basis. However, the links are actually to reproductions of news coverage in various independent publications. I've expanded one of them to explain the source (article title, publication, date, page). Maybe if you could do the same for the other similar sources it may convince a reviewer that the sources are independent (and in-depth?). Sionk (talk) 13:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)"

So what should I do? I'm very tired of so different opinions((( Please, HELP!Lerysik (talk) 06:51, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Regarding "these directions"
Once upon a time, we didn't have the article wizard to handle submissions, so we just threw down some directions on the main AFC page to help the submitters. And those directions were of course removed when the wizard was created, but apparently not the request to follow them. I guess we were so used to having that sentence there it didn't occur to us how out of place it was, and reviewers rarely if ever visited that page anyway. But still, I mean, wow. It's been years since that sentence made any sense. Thanks for noticing and removing it. Someguy1221 (talk) 07:56, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Ha, I actually think that page is very well done and much less confusing for new users than a lot of our other pages. Glad I could help streamline it though ;) --Cerebellum (talk) 12:30, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Sain Kamal khan Sherani
Mr Cerebellum you helped last time in my previous article "HARIFAL". Now I have put in a new article, named above. There I have some problems could you help me.Let me clarify it that the image of Sain kamal khan in my article is free for all use having no copy right claim,In public use; but technically I am not very sound to attach a tag as required by Wikipedia Administrators,though I have tried my level. Could you plz help me. M.A.Harifal. 13:04, 21 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr.Muhammad Akbar (talk • contribs)

Many-many-many thanks!)))
Wow! You can't imagine how happy I am! Many thanks! It was a long job, and finally it is finished and accepted!)))))) I'm just ready to kiss you! I'm very grateful to you)))) Thanks a lot again)))) Lerysik (talk) 06:18, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Nikita Online article
Hello Cerebellum!

Thank you for comment, but it didn't prove useful. I've made all the changes you and the previuos reviewer asked for and I'm still getting decline. I'm starting to think that reviewing here is completely subjective and in my case it turns into some kind of mock. The article I'm trying to publish here on Wikipedia is based only on facts, it's not an advertisement and it's not intended to be an advertisement. I would be really grateful if could provide any assistance.

Pavel Elchenko (talk) 06:46, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, Cerebellum!

Thank you very much for your humane attitude and understanding. I really didn't expect you would respond. It's nice to be mistaken in such expectations.

My best regards!

Pavel Elchenko (talk) 06:37, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Electric Energy in the USA
Cerebellum

I have resubmitted my article now titled "Electic Energy in the USA" I would appreciate your critique and review. Hope I am making progress.

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queenwe (talk • contribs) 03:19, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

Rescue
Cerebellum

I want to inform you, that a guy want an speedy deletion of my article Alejandro Correa Rueda you can help me that the article not be deleted?

I would appreciate your answer. Thank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Wise (talk • contribs) 19:29, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Mouawad Submission
I submitted this for review on accident. I meant for it to do go right to the main space. The citations are inline and link to many different sources including news articles, Wikipedia pages, etc. It will also be included as part of other Wikipedia articles such as this section of Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jumeirah_Lake_Towers#Almas_and_the_Jewellery_Business. Can you please help me determine what specifically you are looking for in the article before it is move? --Morning277 (talk) 12:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, here is the article. I was looking at the original one that you declined. Here is the new version that I submitted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_creation/Mouawad --Morning277 (talk) 12:29, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

Mixman Technologies Article
I fixed the links and references on the submission for Mixman Technologies. Algurley (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

WikiThanks
You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this month! 66.87.7.109 (talk) 22:23, 30 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Awesome, thank for letting me know! --Cerebellum (talk) 12:46, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Electric Energy in the USA
Thanks for your input. I added a chart to Renewable Energy in the United States and some charts, graphs and verbage to Energy in the United States and the Electricity sector of the United States]] primarily to bring their data up to date. I hope to keep updating this each year. I don't plan any new articles as these sections are where my input belongs. Thanks again.

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by Queenwe (talk • contribs) 18:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Help With Article
I just created an article on Asia Food Recipe that was nominated for speedy deletion. Not sure why (looks like the editor has a bot or something he uses to nominate many new articles for speedy deletion). Anyways, the article is notable as it is the largest food recipe submission website in Asia. It looks like someone had previously tried to create this article with a bunch of promotional information which is why it could have been nominated. As I created the article, I am not allowed to remove the speedy deletion tag. Could you please look at the article and Userfy it if you feel it is a notable article. I know that the article is small, but it is similar to a dozen other food recipe submission websites on Wikipedia and certainly more notable as it is the largest one in Asia. Thanks. --Morning277 (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)


 * The page has been deleted and undeleted several times. It is now only nominated for deletion . I would love if you could weigh in on the discussion with your objective opinion. You helped me greatly with Mouawad so I trust your opinion. Thanks. --Morning277 (talk) 15:53, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is ready
Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasit &#124; c 04:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Account activation codes have been emailed.
 * To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
 * The 1-year, free period begins once you enter the code.
 * If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi.  Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
 * A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
 * HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
 * Show off your HighBeam access by placing on your userpage
 * When the 1-year period is up, check the applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

WikiProject Horticulture and Gardening COTM
— Northamerica1000(talk) 00:30, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Military history coordinator election
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)