User talk:CerebraIT

Cerebra for brain injured children
A tag has been placed on Cerebra for brain injured children, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Cerebra for brain injured children and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Although Cerebra may meet wikipedia's notability criteria the article reads as an advertisement. You should also be aware that a conflict of interest could be inferred from your username and the creation of this article. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Agreed. We also need reliable sources independent of the organization. Maybe some news coverage? While I do not question information from the organizations website in and of itself, its use as the only sourcing for the article doesn't work with our neutral point of view policy. The article must be written from a neutral point of view, and - as Jasynnash notes - this really isn't. Please let one of us know if we can be of assistance. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 12:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Cerebra (British Charity)
A tag has been placed on Cerebra (British Charity), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of Cerebra (British Charity) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Jasynnash2 (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * As you've seen, I removed much of the promotional information from the article. It's a notable agency, and I've added references that document this, so the article need not be deleted - that's why I went ahead and made the changes. Everything I removed, though, can be added back in if a) we have an independent source that discusses it - like a news article, or b) it's included as an expansion of the description of the organization. Much of the article was "We provide grants" and "contact us" and similar language, which - if kept - would result in the article being deleted as advertising. I thought it prudent to keep the article (or some of it) and then expand with sources. Again, please let me know if I can help with any of this. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:02, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately I had been writing to those ends myself. I had made considerable edits to those ends, which were then completely lost and not backed up. I have now made a couple of extra edits. The reference to a bbc article that you added had no reference to Cerebra or the work they do, can you explain this? --CerebraIT (talk) 13:06, 13 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Absolutely. The BBC article referred specifically to a grant of "£104,000 to the university to study eye movement abnormalities in children with a variety of neurometabolic diseases." The fact that the organization - and its grant - were notable enough to receive coverage from the BBC - an independent, reliable source - is a reason that the article should not be deleted. The other article discussed the charity's involvement in a high-profile charity event with top-level professional racecar drivers, which also goes to notability. If a subject is not notable, then its article is deleted quite rapidly. My intent was to prevent this. The concern is that, while extensive, the information you're adding to the article is written as if the organization - or its representative - were describing the organization in a press release or similar forum. Wikipedia articles have to be neutral in tone; the result is that this article is tagged as advertising. If we can make the article more neutral - which I attempted to do - then the article can be kept. Otherwise, it is likely that an administrator will delete it. UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:12, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I see what you were doing now, and have read the articles. I will endeavour to adjust accordingly later on today.--CerebraIT (talk) 13:15, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No problem. It looks like this group does quite a bit of good, so finding additional resources to document other programmes should be a simple task - and, don't forget, we're here to help as well. You can ping my talk page if you have any additional questions, or if you need a hand with copyediting. Best, UltraExactZZ Claims~ Evidence 13:32, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam);
 * and you must always:
 * 1) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see Business' FAQ. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of Interest. Dweller (talk) 13:19, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Cerebra (charity) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cerebra (charity) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cerebra (charity) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Ships &amp;  Space (Edits) 02:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)