User talk:Cerf369

Welcome
Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Please respect others' copyrights; do not copy and paste the contents from webpages directly.
 * Please use a neutral point of view when editing articles; this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
 * Do not add unreasonable contents into any articles, such as: copyrighted text, advertisement messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Adding such unreasonable information or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!-Andrew c [talk] 20:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

Changes to 666
Please provide a citation to a reliable source for your new changes, in order to make sure that wikipedia is verifiable. If you hit the "History" tab at the top of an article, you can see the recent changes. This text was added 2 days ago, and I removed it and gave a reason why it was removed. You restored the text without addressing my concern. Please consider this when editing in the future, and if you decide to restore the text again to the article. The article Number of the Beast is a regular target for individuals to post their own interpretative theories (which violates no original research), or to insert fringe theories or other non-sense. This is why we need to make sure all new content is sourced and accurate. Adding bold claims about what is "most likely" without any citation is just asking for trouble. If you need any help in clearing this matter up, I'd be glad to help. Thanks for your consideration. -Andrew c [talk] 20:26, 16 July 2007 (UTC)