User talk:Certes/Archive 1

Spamstar of Glory

 * Good Job on the spam catch! Wikipedia is a better quality project because of hardworking and conscientious editors like you!--Hu12 (talk) 20:53, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Biassed Edit
Certes, why do you delete some external links and do not delete other links? I'm refering to your latest UNDO on Yellow Pages. For some reason you think http://www.worldgreenpages.com/ is ok, but the one you removed is not. Please explain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vano9 (talk • contribs) 17:56, 17 March 2008 (UTC)


 * I removed cyclopages because I have Yellow Pages on my watchlist and saw the new addition. Thank you for noticing worldgreenpages.  I did not see that older link, and I agree that we should remove it too.  I did not mean to favour one directory over another; I think my edit was incomplete rather than biassed.  Certes (talk) 23:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for the touch ups...
... to the Linky tutorial.

I appreciate it.

The Transhumanist 05:34, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
 * You're very welcome. It's the least I can do after someone has gone to the trouble of writing the software and documentation. Certes (talk) 10:43, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Mathías Cardacio and Tabaré Viudez
Hi Certes! I've removed them since they don't satisfy criterium #1 of the list (yet): When they'll play a Serie A match for AC Milan (or any other team), then they'll be ok. --necronudist (talk) 14:47, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) have played at least one Serie A game for the respective club.

Image 111USHouseStructure
Good Day! All I can really say about File:111USHouseStructure.png and it's US Senate counterpart File:111th United States Senate Structure.svg (already converted into SVG) is that it's kind of a pain to keep up, especially in a new Congress. My view is that it's going to be even worse trying to keep up an SVG file; but that might just be because I don't understand the format myself. Other than this, I'd try to coordinate the Senate and House colours between Democrats and Republicans (when i last looked Senate Democrats were in a darker blue) so it'll look nice on United States Congress and I'd also try to match the font as close as possible with the original, because it's a logo, taken directly from a Congressional letterhead. I realize that it will be hard to do a direct conversion but Gage from the Commons looks to have done a decent job with the Senate image.

Thanks for asking for my input, none of my suggestions are great or anything, they're just ideas. Good luck!

Aricci526 (talk) 23:06, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

License tagging for File:3 Gold Stars.svg
Thanks for uploading File:3 Gold Stars.svg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:05, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

Dodecahedron images
Frankly, I don't mind in the least. I helped, and if this helps Wikipedia more, then what kind of editor would I be to complain about it? :-) Timeroot (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

Someone Nearly Left a Bracket Open (But I Closed It Just in Time)
What an excellent name for an album!!! :) -- can  dle &bull; wicke  01:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Zobel network
Nice job updating my tacky early Wiki-career artwork, but the component symbol you are using has an aspect ratio that is too stretched. Compare File:Zobel (3) Bridge T.svg for instance with File:Electrical symbols library.svg, the Wikiproject electronics master template.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  22:28, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * IEC 60617 says it should be 3:1 if you really want to be exact.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  22:32, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I was just looking for that ratio. I'll sort it out and also resize to fit the size displayed rather than the original PNG size, but that will probably be tomorrow as it's bedtime in my time zone. Certes (talk) 22:35, 12 June 2009 (UTC)


 * Looks good to me now. By the way, I reverted another editor this morning who tried to update some of the other images - I didn't think they were an improvement.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  11:24, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Zobel plots
Ping an e-mail to me and I will send back the Excel spreadsheets that were used, although the Bode plot and the video line plot are quite deliberately not scaled because they are representational only, not related to any real circuit.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  14:05, 14 June 2009 (UTC)


 * If you've already done that, can you do it again, the e-mail I had registered with Wikipedia seems to be broken, I've just registered a new one.  Sp in ni ng  Spark  17:16, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

SVG debauchery
I meant for others to edit that page, as though it was in WP: space (Which it may be someday), so I don't revert peoples' edits to it. I've slightly changed it though. 76.117.247.55 (talk) 01:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC)

Re:Incorrect colour
Yes, you may mark it as resolved. Thanks Arteyu ?  Blame it on me !  05:55, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

SVGified logo
You are invited to participate in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Arteyu ? Blame it on me !  16:35, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you, Arteyu. I had missed that discussion and several parallel ones.  I don't think I can contribute much but I'll stop converting fair-use logos to SVG for the time being, as I think WP has better uses for our limited time. Certes (talk) 17:15, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot
Hi Certes, Thanks a lot for creating the shield for WP:INR. That template will be a great use for us.On behalf of WP:INR team and personally thank you once agian -- naveenpf (talk) 12:54, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You are very welcome. The template is best used in infoboxes - see Location Map for similar uses.  At the moment it only does National Highways, so you may need to create a new road type by making Template:Road Marker IN something and a suitable blank sign.  Let me know if I can help, but I may be slow to reply for the next week. Certes (talk) 23:08, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Review request
Hey there. Just wanted to say thanks for the suggestion to run the image through Inkscape. It worked like a charm, and I managed to get this shiny new map of the Trans-Alaska Pipeline uploaded. JKBrooks85 (talk) 22:46, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Well done - but that was Kmusser's suggestion not mine! Certes (talk) 22:51, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Road marker
Certes, I have requested for an enhancement at Road marker. Please check and respond when you get a chance. Thanks, Ganeshk  ( talk ) 04:46, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the comments. Response at Road marker. Certes (talk) 21:02, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Tunisian names
It's been more than a year since I found that source. I don't remember any longer what was on it. It's possible that additional names have been added and haven't been reverted since that time by other posters. This is a hard list to keep from being vandalized. Maybe add a source needed tag after Tunisia? --Bookworm857158367 (talk) 19:01, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

Interracial laws map
Hi, thanks again for making the map showing when all the US states repealed their anti-miscegnation laws. There's a slight mistake though in that Virginia is shown in grey when it should be red, is it possible to fix this? Thanks, YeshuaD avid   •  Talk  • 22:11, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Fixed, sorry about that. Certes (talk) 11:05, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks, very good map otherwise. YeshuaD avid   •  Talk  • 00:23, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

Graphic labs
Hey Certes, I left you a response at Graphic_Lab/Image_workshop. Sorry about the late reply&mdash;I forgot to keep an eye on that page. Thanks for your help so far, r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 17:22, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. I've put my reply at Graphic_Lab/Image_workshop for the benefit of anyone else wishing to contribute to the image. Certes (talk) 22:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Trading Card Game
Hey, do you know someone who could make an userbox for the trading card game project? A userbox that could say This user is member of the trading card game project or something like that.-- Ratón Bat   Talk 2 me!!  00:29, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll try to produce something tomorrow. Can you suggest a suitable small graphic, like the dice in User:Scepia/BGG? Certes (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe this cards...-- Ratón Bat   Talk 2 me!!  00:59, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

I have added a new graphic File:Trading card game.svg based on the one you provided, added it to Trading card game/Userbox and created category Category:Wikipedia Trading card game members. I've replaced the logo at the top of Trading card game and advertised the userbox at the bottom. There's an example of the userbox on my home page User:Certes (bottom right of userbox block). I realise that the grey sphere and W only vaguely resemble the Wikipedia logos. Please improve them (bearing in mind the low resolution in a userbox) if you're comfortable negotiating your way round the Foundation's heavy copyright and trademark protection. By the way, WikiProject Games could be another good place to advertise this venture. Certes (talk) 10:38, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Could you improve the cards or ask someone to do so. I'm not a tecnological user and more if you talk about painting and stuff like that. Oh, and thanks for everything (helping me, making a userbox, etc.)!-- Ratón Bat   Talk 2 me!!  00:34, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll ask at Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop. Certes (talk) 01:01, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ok-- Ratón Bat   Talk 2 me!!  01:10, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Graphics replaced by alternatives suggested at GL/I. I hope that's better. Certes (talk) 22:55, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is much better, by the way, how could we advertise the project at WikiProject Games?-- Ratón Bat   Talk 2 me!!  00:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Good question. Could Trading card game become an official WikiProject within WikiProject Games, or do you have to be about creating or improving articles to qualify for Project status?  If so, would we want to go along that route? Certes (talk) 13:22, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Kehilla
I asked today for a bot at the WP:Bot requests page, I hope it will solve the problem. --Pylambert (talk) 11:07, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I hope it is clear exactly what the bot should do: I don't know enough about the topic to help much with that part. Certes (talk) 21:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Lifetime
You can check instructions in Lifetime and the discussion in Template talk:Lifetime. More specifically, there was a long discussion in September in the section Template_talk:Lifetime which ended with the Template_talk:Lifetime some weeks later. Additionally, both Yobot and SmaBot got approved from BAG to replace Lifetime. Yobot's one can be found in Bots/Requests_for_approval/Yobot_8. Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 21:22, 29 December 2009 (UTC)

Oxygas welding station (Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop)
Maybe I can take on your request Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop but I'm sorry if it gonna take a quite long time, because I'm quite busy right now. Ivan Akira (talk) 23:40, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your help. I did not make the request myself and I have no special interest in the subject; I simply refactored a request from an IP editor into WP:GL/I's customary format. Certes (talk) 01:01, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * It's okay if you have no interest, but can you check my work? Even I think the hose location seems still in dangerous position. Hohoho... Ivan Akira (talk) 11:49, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That looks better to me, but I've not welded anything since I left school. The hose passes through a dome on top of the workbench; if it's supposed to be that way then I don't see how we can improve things much further.  I'll ask for other opinions at Talk:Oxy-fuel welding and cutting. Certes (talk) 11:58, 5 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok, it's nice to hear it. Ivan Akira (talk) 13:10, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

DYK Award images and templates
Thanks again for making the twelve DYK awards. Nice work!

I have assigned a pair of colors to the templates which will deliver these awards, but I am unsatisfied that the colors I chose complement your images as well as they could. Can you comment on or be bold and change the template colors to best fit your color scheme?


 * – The 25 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal – Award for (25) or more creation and expansion contributions to DYK.
 * – The 50 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal – Award for (50) or more creation and expansion contributions to DYK.
 * – The 100 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal – Award for (100) or more creation and expansion contributions to DYK.
 * – The 200 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal – Award for (200) or more creation and expansion contributions to DYK.
 * – The 500 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal – Award for (500) or more creation and expansion contributions to DYK.
 * – The 1000 DYK Creation and Expansion Medal – Award for (1000) or more creation and expansion contributions to DYK.
 * – The 25 DYK Nomination Medal – Award for (25) or more nomination contributions to DYK.
 * – The 50 DYK Nomination Medal – Award for (50) or more nomination contributions to DYK.
 * – The 100 DYK Nomination Medal – Award for (100) or more nomination contributions to DYK.
 * – The 200 DYK Nomination Medal – Award for (200) or more nomination contributions to DYK.
 * – The 500 DYK Nomination Medal – Award for (500) or more nomination contributions to DYK.
 * – The 1000 DYK Nomination Medal – Award for (1000) or more nomination contributions to DYK.

Thanks in advance. Binksternet (talk) 05:29, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * That's a good group of templates: simple but effective. How about the versions in User:Certes/Sandbox?  They use the colours from the gradient on the barnstar and top panel (they're the same).  The template's background is halfway between the lightest part of the barnstar and white, and its border and text are halfway between the darkest part of the barnstar and black.  To use this in your templates, just change the three colours on your top line to #584010 #e0e0a0 #584010 (CE gold) or #404040 #e0e0e0 #404040 (N silver).  Certes (talk) 10:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Looks good! Thanks for serving as color consultant! Binksternet (talk) 13:43, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Discussion invitation
(refactored message)

Trading card game
I'm seeking to revive/speed up the process of making the card game. Seeing that you have commented about getting on with the project (and that you are author of rules proposal 5), I thought you might be interested to know that I've devised a (very rough) action plan and am thinking of ways to advertise the project; your help would be very appreciated. Thanks, ♠  TomasBat   01:07, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. That looks like a good plan.  My main comment is that some of phases 2-5 can be carried out in parallel once we have decided which rule set to adopt.  However, I have a couple of concerns.  Firstly, are there enough interested editors with the right skills to complete the project?  Secondly, is there any real prospect of our end product being approved at a high enough level to allow use of the Wikipedia trademarks? Certes (talk) 02:03, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Regarding the first point, Jéské Couriano had contacted a card template developer to develope/help develope a program to aid us in card creation . He agreed to help once the rules were defined, and I reckon he has experience in TCGs and card creation. Also, for instance, remember that Pretzels designed an example card using article styles (File:TCGRollbacker.png) which looks quite good; this shows that there are a couple of users skilled in design and stuff that could certainly help. As for your second point, this perhaps is a bit tricky. Items at the Wikipedia cafepress store were designed by wikimedians; but I'm not sure if cafepress allows for something as specefic as cards. Hopefully once the game is finished the Signpost or something will draw attention to the finished game, and somehow we'll get the cards to be actually printed. ♠  TomasBat   03:31, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

About BLP
I can reply to your interrogation on the BLP RFC page. You should read this and weight whatever the bogeyman exists or not. --KrebMarkt 18:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh no, not another tl;dr episode of *kip versus the rouge admin! But seriously, thank you for the reference: I did read it through and learnt from it.  I can see that some Arbitrators are keen to, shall we say, tighten procedures by diverse means.  Let's hope the community can tell a judiciary from a legislature and act accordingly.  Certes (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I hope you can understand why some moderate editors like i, are pushing for an acceptable compromise because we know which direction a majority of arbitrators, 5 or more of them (the majority is 5 votes in ArbCom ruling), are leaning to and clearly we don't want ArbCom to have the final word in the BLP issue if a compromise isn't reached. Last thing, i would like to leave a proof that as an editor participating to the BLP debate i'm not just talk see here that also explains why i tag myself as a moderate in the debate. --KrebMarkt 21:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I can see you're being moderate and helpful, part of the solution rather than the problem. If there were more like you around then maybe I'd still care about Wikipedia as passionately as I did a few weeks ago.  However, I'm no longer too bothered; if the rules change in ways I find unacceptable then I'll quietly stop editing and spend my time where it's more appreciated. Certes (talk) 00:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

One more indirect evidence on where the higher-up are leaning to here that some reading but it infers a lot on everyone position on BLP issue & beyond. --KrebMarkt 09:55, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Amazing!
Wikipedia_talk:Linking. Tony  (talk)  02:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, I quite liked that one. It looks like careless use of one of the automated editing tools rather than someone having a laugh. Certes (talk) 02:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

1891–92 Football Alliance
Hi,

You might want to check the additions I was in progress of doing when you inserted the anchor (appreciate the help). I wonder if you might be in position to get hold of more actual match results… in case you lived in England somwhere. I'm in Scandinavia, and can't do much more to improve this page.

Apanuggpak (talk) 20:15, 4 March 2010 (UTC)


 * I hope I didn't interrupt your changes. I was working through the broken section links listed here.  I know it can be hard finding results from so long ago, and unfortunately I don't have any match results to add.  I have looked through the details you added.  I do not know enough about the subject to confirm that it is all correct, but it looks reasonable and I can not see any mistakes.  I think this is already the most complete set of data on the internet.  The only similar work I can see that you have not referenced is Lojikal.  Well done, and thanks for all the good work. Certes (talk) 01:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

BLP discussion
Hi ! If there is any consensus at  at all,  it  is that  the entire discussion has become a tangled confusion, and as a result both  proponents and opponents of the issues under discussion  are abandoning ship. None of us want this. It is still not  clear which  way  consensus will  fall and your contributions to the discussion are invaluable. However, In an attempt to  keep  the policy  discussion on an even track, some users have decided to  start  the ball rolling for clarity by creating a special  workshop pages. The first of these is for the technical development  of a template at  WT:BLP PROD TPL in  case policy is decided for it. The taskforce pages are designed keep irrelevant stuff off the policy discussion  and talk  page, and help a few of us to  move this whole debate towards a decision of some kind or another. The pages will be linked in a way  that watchers will  still find their way  to them. This move is not intended to influence any  policy whatsoever; It  is to keep  the discussion  pages focussed on the separate issues. Cheers. --Kudpung (talk) 23:31, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the notice. I agree.  I'm looking at these at the moment, and will contribute when I've untangled enough threads to understand what's going on. Certes (talk) 23:34, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I've taken time out to consider what's going on here. Although there's no consensus, a majority have agreed to move, within the broad limits of the existing written policies, from an approach I supported to one I oppose. I'm not going to disrupt the process, but nor will I volunteer to implement changes I disagree with. Bullying, deletion threats and arbitrary deadlines mean that I no longer find these activities rewarding. I applaud the work of those who continue to guard and improve BLPs, and I'm confident that you will continue to do a great job without my help. Certes (talk) 11:57, 9 March 2010 (UTC)