User talk:Certiffon


 * }

Thank you!
Could you direct me to the link you found the information? You have no idea how happy this makes me. Since Jian Bozan mentions Greek people in his book, that means the author of the book I am reviewing intentionally suppressed that information. My review punches holes in many of his theories.

Nine times out of ten, my (obscure?) questions get passed over by the average person active in the help desk. Thank you again.

--Ghostexorcist (talk) 19:46, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
 * I would like to thank you by name in the review for your assistance. But since the review will be read by scholars, I don't want to use your Wikipedia user name. Is there anyway that you could provide me with your actual name? There is no need to post it on here. If you go to my talk page, you will see a series of nine small pictures on the top right of the page. The picture shaped like a mail box is actually a link to an email messenger on Wikipedia. If you feel like sharing your name, the message will be sent to my personal email and no one else on Wikipedia will see it. Please let me know. Thank you. --Ghostexorcist (talk) 12:59, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
Thanks for your help on talk:past life regression. If you're interested, I've asked a couple clarification questions. Mendel 56 doesn't seem interested in a substantive discussion so far, but has at least stopped blanket reverting which suggests they may find a more productive way of integrating this information with a bit of prodding. I don't believe general web pages or even news stories are appropriate sources for this kind of information but that only means the sourcing needs to be improved, not the information outright forbidden from the page. WLU (t) (c) Wikipedia's rules: simple/complex 17:42, 20 September 2010 (UTC)