User talk:Certifiedloverboydrake

Your submission at Articles for creation: Miangul Abdul Haq Jahanzeb Kidney Hospital (September 7)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Miangul Abdul Haq Jahanzeb Kidney Hospital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Miangul Abdul Haq Jahanzeb Kidney Hospital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Miangul_Abdul_Haq_Jahanzeb_Kidney_Hospital Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TheBirdsShedTears&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Miangul_Abdul_Haq_Jahanzeb_Kidney_Hospital reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 10:35, 7 September 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Prime Minister of Pakistan
Please keep the WP:Civility policy in mind. Your edit summary comment to was out of order, he did not breach WP:3RR and now I'm keeping an eye on it too and agree with him and will revert again if I need to. The problem with the image is clearly explained on Commons. Remedy it there and then we can figure out whether or not your image is even better. Right now it looks like you've stolen a copyrighted image from Getty so it must be remedied there first, we cannot keep a WP:COPYVIO up. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) please always ping! 14:32, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Persecution of Ahmadis. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Pepper Beast   (talk)  00:15, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Persecution of Ahmadis shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DMacks (talk) 21:43, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. DMacks (talk) 18:43, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
 * No branch of Islam has authority over others, nor do we accept any of them as having a monopoly on the "truth". There's consensus specifically about that at Talk:Ahmadiyya. WP:NPOV fail and continued WP:EW led to this block, and will promptly lead to longer ones if your behavior does not change. DMacks (talk) 18:46, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

October 2021
Hello, I'm Longhair. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pop Smoke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Longhair\talk 22:11, 1 October 2021 (UTC)

I added a interview of his brother and the facebook page of the mosque who hosted his funeral. That's a reliable source

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 22:25, 1 October 2021 (UTC)