User talk:CesarLeo

Libertarian Party ballot access
The Arkansas Libertarian Party does not have ballot access for 2008, only the LP's presidential candidate. since the ballot access section lists states the Libertarian Party is on the ballot I removed Arkansas from the list, but made mention of the parties presidential ballot placement (with references) at the bottom of the section. Highground79 01:24, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for taking an interest in ballot access but rather then label states as "on deck" which means nothing to most people, I suggest you check out the site Ballot Access News. The site maintains an in depth chart on third party ballot access as well as reports on the status of the various lawsuits filed by third parties or coalitions representing them (Coalition For Free and Open Elections). I also created a seperate section under ballot access for states where the parties presidential candidate is on the ballot but the party as a whole is not. please in the future reframe from removing referenced information unless your replacing it with more up to date referenced information. I'm sure your edits were done in good faith but some people might consider it vandalism, to remove referenced info and replace with info that is both inacurate and unreferenced. Changes in ballot status are widely reported in statewide news and number of non-partial sources are available, the LP website is obviously partisan and sometimes can be misleading. Highground79 19:07, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

‎Ron Nehring
Hi, I saw your latest contribution to Ron Nehring, and I appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia. However, you did not create sections in the article, which is a requirement in Wikipedia articles. If you don't know how to create articles, you can visit WP:MoS or message me by clicking on "91093" and clicking on the "+" at the top of the page. Happy editing! — Cuyler  91093  -  Соитяівцтіоиѕ  05:05, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Ron Nehring
was tagged as a copyright violation. I gutted the thing or now. We cannot accept material that is copyrighted elsewhere. You can rewrite the thing so that it is worded differently than the source and cite the source. Cheers,  Dloh  cierekim  Deleted?  05:14, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello,. Concerning your contribution, Ron Nehring, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. As a copyright violation, Ron Nehring appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Ron Nehring has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ron Nehring and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Ron Nehring with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ron Nehring.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Dloh cierekim  Deleted?  05:16, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Incorrect attribution of denomination to Dr. King
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your recent edit appears to have added incorrect information, and has been reverted or removed. All information in the encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable published source. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  13:49, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

April 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This is particularly important when adding or changing any facts or figures and helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  Eagles   24/7  (C)  21:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13
Hi. When you recently edited Ludlow, California, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chevron (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Josh Hamilton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Zepppep (talk) 10:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Dan Wheldon. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Zepppep (talk) 10:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Josh Hamilton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The source you provided in the edit summary does not support the claim you make. Additionally, the incident is already covered in the article. If you have disagreements, go to the article's talk page. Zepppep (talk) 10:27, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive behaviour. Your behaviour is verging on harassment. Wikipedia prides itself on providing a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing edits, such as the one you made to The Great Khali, potentially compromise that safe environment. If you continue behaving like this, you may be blocked from editing. Zepppep (talk) 10:38, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 10:40, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Accusing someone of voluntary manslaughter is very serious and needs a rock-solid source and consensus with your fellow editors. Considering you made the edit again despite the warning above, I have blocked your account to prevent further disruption. Any future edits you want to make to the Josh Hamilton page must be discussed on the talk page first. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 10:42, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Max Semenik (talk) 00:55, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Ron Nehring for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ron Nehring is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ron Nehring& until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Walk Like an Egyptian (talk) 07:15, 22 March 2019 (UTC)