User talk:Cesare Borgia

Kelly Ripa Talk page
Please do not remove content from Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. - Mike Beckham 05:03, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

I removed vandalism. You committed vandalism by removing my content. Cesare Borgia 00:45, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Regarding edits made during July 3 2006 (UTC)
Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. &mdash; getcrunk   what?!  14:46, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The link is neither commercial nor my website. It is an invaluable resource of Kelly Ripa news, articles, videos, and pics.Cesare Borgia 00:48, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not remove others' comments on talk pages. It can be seen as vandalism. &mdash; getcrunk   what?!  01:01, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I removed vandalism, I did not commit it. It had nothing to do with Kelly Ripa, it was spam, so I deleted it.Cesare Borgia 01:06, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the hard work of others. Thank you. You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule on Kelly Ripa. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from further editing. &mdash; getcrunk   what?!  01:15, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - Mike Beckham 04:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

I have never vandalized a page. It is you that have vandalized numerous pages and you know it. Cesare Borgia 05:13, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Wikipedia has specific guidelines and policies that editors are supposed to follow. You have repeatedly disturbed Wikipedia to make a WP:POINT. Wikipedia is not a place where you can disregard the rules. You MAY NOT remove others' comments on article talk pages. &mdash; getcrunk   what?!  13:39, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

I have blocked you for 24 hours for interfering with other's comments on talk pages. Please read WP:CIVIL and come back tomorrow. --Sam Blanning(talk) 13:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

No wonder Wikipedia is a mess. They put vandals in charge! I have not interfered with any one's comments. All I did was remove vandalism. Cesare Borgia 07:12, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * This is not removal of vandalism. Vandalism has a very strict definition, found at WP:VAND, and accusing others of it unjustly is a severe personal attack. Please reconsider your choice of language. --Sam Blanning(talk) 09:05, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

Precisely. You have accused me of vandalism unjustly and by your own admission you have committed a severe personal attack against me. I've emailed many at Wikipedia that they have a rogue administrator who sides with vandals. And I'm finding others who agree with me. I've encouraged them to email Wikipedia as well. Seems I'm not the first one you've messed with. Hopefully I'll be the last when they boot your ass. Cesare Borgia 05:54, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * I fail to be impressed. Currently you are the only one I've heard from about this, so where these others that agree with you are, I don't know. If you want to find others to agree with you and maybe actually do something, try posting at the Administrators' noticeboard. --Sam Blanning(talk) 11:30, 8 July 2006 (UTC)