User talk:Cesariano~enwiki

Notability is satisfied...
I found mentions of it of course, when I had a look around, but I still think it would make a stronger part of an article in the its merge target. For example, the current merge target frankly sucks. It should have its 'notable alumni' component removed, or possibly relocated to List_of_Johns_Hopkins_University_people, which would then leave room for the Center for Bologna. A paragraph or two of verifiable 'stuff' isn't worth the separate page. --Izno (talk) 17:23, 31 March 2009 (UTC)


 * I certainly agree that a couple of paragraphs in the merge target would strengthen it, however would the optimum solution not be to have a section in the target article that redirects to this article using the main tag.
 * This is personal opinion, as the main tag is for articles which were properly split out per summary style. This, I wouldn't hesitate to claim, was not.
 * I personally do not understand why this would not have its own article as it is one of the most important educational institutions for international affairs in Europe, and as I said before a separate entity from the campus in Washington with its own permanent faculty and intellectual identity.
 * Who said that? When? Etc, etc, etc. This is why I would rather see it in the parent article. Unless it's someone else saying it, which there are very few, it really would strengthen the parent. If (when?) the time comes that there are boatloads of information available for the Bologna Center, then I could see it being resplit. But unless you have those boatloads hidden inside your head, I definitely believe it should be merged.
 * Afterall I think one could make the comparison with colleges at Oxford or Cambridge, all of whom have their own articles and none of which award degrees independently of their respective Universities.
 * Hmm? Either I'm parsing that incorrectly, or you're agreeing with me. Which probably means you wrote it wrong. :P --Izno (talk) 17:59, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Cesariano. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Cesariano~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 22:52, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 11:28, 22 April 2015 (UTC)