User talk:Cesartj

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. You may not know that Wikipedia has a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia makes it harder to read. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Analogue Kid 21:35, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Wendy's
Hello Cesartj. I've put the refence to Wendy's back into the Columbus page, as per the discussion on the talk page. I think currently we have a consensus to keep it in. I note that while deleting the reference to Wendy's, ostensibly because they moved their HQ to Dublin, you left in the very next paragraph:
 * ''...Historically, Port Columbus International Airport was once home to a North American Aviation factory (later North American/Rockwell). Aircraft built in Columbus include the North American F-86 Sabre...'

Why is it ok to refer to North American Aviation, which no longer exists, but not Wendy's, which moved to a nearby suburb that technically is incorporated as a separate town? Pardon the pun, but I suspect you have a beef about Wendy's :-) Pete St.John 17:33, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Re:Wendy's had their first store in downtown and they started here but they dont have their corporate headquarters inside the city limits so ITS NOT valid to put that company on the ECONOMY section ,if you read my comment before i said that Wendy's should be in a separate chapter about the history of Columbus.For example Sofa Express and more a furniture retail chain (38+ stores)was also based inside the city and their first store was also in Columbus but they have moved to the suburb of Groveport and thats the reason that BOTH of those chains are NOW on the Columbus metropolitan area page
 * I see that instead of answering the question, you reacted by deleting the North American Aviation item. If we discuss it first, we can (in theory) reach some understanding about the materials that should be included. I'm discouraged by the appearance that you prefer an edit war. Pete St.John 21:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

re:i see that ECONOMY should be the companies that are actually part of the city tax base, not about company histories or products that are not made inside the city any longer, guess you didnt read when i said that all those places should have their place on the HISTORY part of the page


 * If you post to the discussion page we can discuss it. I only noticed you had replied here because I was reviewing your contribution history. I disagree that the "economics" section should only have items in the city's tax base; many city dwellers are employed in suburbs, and vice-versa. Also, items about economic history (such as the Wendy's move) could be in either "history" or "economics" sections; I think that this item is most likely to be of interest to readers of the "economics" section. I urge you to consider editting a section (e.g. by creating a new heading, or moving the item to the history section) instead of merely deleting. Reverting each other doesn't converge, it oscillates. Reformating, rewording, etc, can lead to compromise, mutual acceptance, and convergence. It benefits no one if we just revert each other forever. Please reply at the discussion page, or on my talk page. Pete St.John 22:05, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

re: seems to me like you work for Wendy's lol or maybe own some shares .lol