User talk:Cesium62

about Photovoltaics
You reverted a series of vandalisms and you reverted my edit on Photovoltaics. I'm pretty sure my edit was not "obvious vandalism". You may disagree with the point I was making, or I may be making the point poorly, but the fact remains that the EROI section on the Photovoltaics page references a poorly argued paper whose basic premise is either ridiculous or meaningless. 71.141.98.189 00:17, 15 March 2007 (UTC) aka Cesium62 00:18, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Well, my revert is not a mistake, but it is not completely fair either! The truth is that I found your edit a bit difficult to understand (but I did notice it, I don't revert a set of edits without looking at them individually). Had it not been surrounded by vandalism, I wouldn't have reverted it, thought. This article is a common target for vandalism or for people who want their "exotic" theory to be publicized. That's why I might be a bit heavy-handed on the revert-button. Sorry for that, and thanks for raising this problem. CyrilB 10:36, 17 March 2007 (UTC)