User talk:Ceyockey/archive8 2011

Talk:Cuba_Libre
All input welcome. Cheers. walk victor falktalk 00:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:United Water companyWeb logo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:United Water companyWeb logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hugahoody (talk) 20:30, 24 January 2011 (UTC)

Welcome back!
Welcome back to WikiProject Anthroponymy! Come check out our new layout.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 07:03, 26 January 2011 (UTC).

Feb 2011 Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 06:31, 2 February 2011 (UTC).

Kells (band)
Would you please activate the deleted article again? Kells is a first class gothic metal band in France and already touring in different countries with Tarja Turunen, Revamp and Epica just to mention a few. Lots of references can be found and two albums released up to date with very positive reviews outside France. Btw, the article already exist in French and Spanish wikipedia. Drop me a line when the article is available again and I personally will update all info shown. Regards! --Gilwellian (talk) 23:04, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

WP:APO template deletions
Hey guys, a couple of templates used by WP:APO have been nominated for deletion. We could use your help to Oppose their deletion. If you agree the project needs them, as per WPAPO:HN then please vote Oppose here: Templates_for_discussion

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 04:03, 24 February 2011 (UTC).

WP:APO March Newsletter
Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Anthroponymy at 09:43, 3 March 2011 (UTC).

Moving sections on talk pages
Hi. I noticed you moved two sections at Talk:Domestic pig to the end of the discussion before adding your comments to them. I've not seen this done before, and I wonder why you did it? New discussions are often moved to the end, if they've been incorrectly placed at the beginning. However, older, existing discussions usually stay in their original position, and I'd have thought that moving them tends to make it more difficult to understand the order of contributions. It's also more difficult to spot your new contribution, as the whole section shows as changed, not just your bit. Regards, Richard New Forest (talk) 08:51, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

File:IPTG flat.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:IPTG flat.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Leyo 07:51, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

PMC links in journal cites
Hi, when adding citations with a PMC, please try not to enter the PMC with 'PMC' at the start of it, as here, since the PMC link then doesn't work. I've corrected that one. Thanks Rjwilmsi  13:42, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

developments you might be interested in
You might be interested in my latest comment at Articles for deletion/Companies listed on the Singapore Exchange. Also you might want to check out the wikilink I provided there. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 19:51, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Facebook
Hello, in Facebook the dates used to be a mixture of formats. I standardised the date format on MDY throughout, since Facebook is an American company. I see that you have now changed some of them, though not all of them, back to DMY, so the article is again inconsistent. I just wondered if you have some special reason for doing this? I personally don't really care which format is used but it ought to be consistent throughout the article, don't you agree? -- Alarics (talk) 07:08, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for your response. -- Alarics (talk) 14:57, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

disambiguition pages needed
1 Amrit - film of 1986 2 Redrose - film of 1980 3 Khamoshi - film in 1970 and 1998 4 Muqabla - 1979 and another one in 1992 5 Dhanwan - 1981 blockbuster and 1992 Hit 6 Durgaa - one is a blockbuster film in 1985 and other is godess durga. 7 Hum Dono - 1995 flop, 1985 blockbuster, 1961 blockbuster 8 Rajput - one is about kingdom and other is a 1982 blockbuster 9 Jaanwar - 1982 film and 1999/2000 film 10 Chakravyuha - ONE IS Military formation narrated in the Hindu epic Mahabharata. AND OTHER IS 1977 film 11 Aanchal - one is Pakistani Urdu newspaper and other is 1980 film 12 Zamana - a 1985 blockbuster film and another is about Cezary Zamana 13 Maalik - islamic name and another is 1972 movie 14 Choti Bahu - one is a serial and another is 1971 blockbuster 15 Joroo Ka Ghulam - one is 2000 film and other is 1972 blockbuster

Note - artciles and pages are already created but only disambiguation pages is needed with respect to these Hindi Movies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Paglakahinka (talk • contribs) 18:37, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to take part in a study
I am a Wikipedian, who is studying the phenomenon on Wikipedia. I need your help to conduct my research on about understanding "Motivation of Wikipedia contributors." I would like to invite you to Main Study. Please give me your valuable time, which estimates about 20 minutes. I chose you as a English Wikipedia user who made edits recently through the RecentChange page. Refer to the first page in the online survey form for more information on the study and me.cooldenny (talk) 02:26, 24 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of List of genealogy publications for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of genealogy publications is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of genealogy publications until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Damiens .rf 21:35, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Ameur for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ameur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ameur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wilbysuffolk  talk  05:56, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Self-reporting edit proportions.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Self-reporting edit proportions.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Kelly hi! 22:24, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Merge discussion for Access time
An article that you have been involved in editing, Access time, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. &sect; Music Sorter &sect;  (talk) 06:19, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

WP Anthroponymy in the Signpost
"WikiProject Report" would like to focus on WikiProject Anthroponymy for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Other editors will also have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 21:35, 18 July 2011 (UTC)

Richard F. Heck
Hi there

I noticed you've applied WebCite to the references in this article. I'm not sure what purpose they serve. DOIs are supposed to be permanent links to the articles. The WebCite-archived material is no different from what you might find at the abstract linked by the DOI. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 07:04, 5 August 2011 (UTC)
 * DOI links were meant to be persistent identifiers, to help isolate access to a scientific article from changes in URLs which might come from publisher corporate reorganizations or IT-driven revisions to the URL structure. They were not meant to be indicators of permanent availability of content from the original publisher.  In the "What is WebCite" information at http://www.webcitation.org/, the fact that the site was originally established as a preservation resource for scholarly material appears.  In other words, publishers who might use the DOI standard were concerned about long term preservation and, therefore, established WebCite as a resource to ensure permanent availability.  DOI and WebCite are not mutually exclusive or at odds, but rather serve different purposes. --User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 00:51, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting back. I see your point. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 12:34, 6 August 2011 (UTC)

Thomas MacDonough page
Greetings Ceyockey,

Since there is a Wiki Project Delaware rating box on the Thomas Macdonough talk page I thought it best to come here about an issue with that biography. I am in the process of rewriting the page. A couple of months or so ago I discovered that the entire article then was a cut and paste job, lifted from the Delaware Military History web site and was tagged for lacking citations. -- Now that the article is almost completely rewritten and greatly expanded, I would like to move the name 'Thomas MacDonough', spelled with an Upper-case 'D', to a spelling that uses Lower-case 'd' i.e. 'Thomas Macdonough'. This is the spelling used throughout the article. Since all the reliable sources used in the article, new and old, spell the name as 'Macdonough', I think the page name should also be spelled this way. I attempted to make the move myself but in this case it requires an administrator. If such a spelling is agreeable could you do this? Also, the page currently has a 'Start' rating from the Delaware project. At this point the article is nearing completion so the project may want to update the rating. Any and all help would be greatly appreciated. Regards, Gwillhickers (talk) 22:32, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Starlab Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Starlab Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Starlab Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 00:26, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

List of fictional characters ... pending deletion
Hello,

You may be interested in the discussion regarding deleting a list article regarding fictional Carpenters. You have in the past created a List of surname Brown. I created a list of real and fictional Carpenter because other editors/admins told me to do so from the Carpenter surname page. Now others want to delete it. I was happy with the way it was and would be happy to merge the fictional Carpenters with the list of surname Carpenters. Any input, pro or con would be welcome.

See: List_of_fictional_characters_with_surname_Carpenter

Jrcrin001 (talk) 22:51, 18 October 2011 (UTC)


 * follow up:

Last year you provided input on the Talk:Carpenter (surname) page. And two lists were split off of real and fictional people. While I was on a wiki break the List of fictional characters with surname Carpenter was deleted without discussion. Later I requested the person to restore it. The page was then immediately cited as an article for deletiion.

Again, any input pro or con would be welcome on the deletion discussion at Articles for deletion/List of fictional characters with surname Carpenter

Thank you. Jrcrin001 (talk) 20:03, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Geometry stub icon.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Geometry stub icon.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 20:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Zocor sales proportional.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zocor sales proportional.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

File:ImpactFactorChart GenomeResearch.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ImpactFactorChart GenomeResearch.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 21:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

File:ImpactFactorChart AmNat.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ImpactFactorChart AmNat.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

December 2011 Newsletter for WikiProject United States
--Kumioko (talk) 03:54, 12 December 2011 (UTC)