User talk:Cfowler8/sandbox

Race in the United States criminal justice system

Yes, I would say that everything in the article does pertain to race in the United States. The only distraction here is the lengthy historical background takes away from the criminal aspect. Nothing is out of date from what I can see. I feel that more could have been added to the "Call to Reform" passage. Adding cases of racial disparities from the current news and reviewing all the laws and policies that affect racial disparities would add to the text. The article is neutral. Although I feel like it is geared towards the male point of view and does not show the effects of women who deal with the racial disparities within the US criminal justice system. Many things seems to be from a male perspective. Women are underrepresented here. Yes. The links are functioning and are informative about race in the criminal justice system. Each fact comes from other sources either scholarly articles or journal references. Other websites are also utilized that present cold facts. If it is biased it is noted from other wiki handlers. Talk Page In the talk page wiki handlers are discussing the appropriate ways to introduce topics, properly citing, sentence structure and more. I do not know how it is rated in Wiki. I do not know for sure or how to find out yet. This topic is more about the specifics of racial disparities and its historical context over time in the United States. Wikipedia discusses our class topic in a more information and inviting way.
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * What else could be improved?
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects?
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class