User talk:Cg29692

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- S iva1979 Talk to me 15:43, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Stats
Hi. When updating footballers stats in the infobox, you should type five tildes (~) in the "pcupdate" field. Thanks, Mattythewhite 21:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Please remember this. Thanks, Mattythewhite 15:24, 13 October 2007 (UTC)

Removal of content
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Mattythewhite 17:52, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Can you please explain why you're randomly moving stuff around on the Neal Bishop article? Mattythewhite 17:55, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ashley West
A tag has been placed on Ashley West requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Travis talk  19:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Cliff Akurang
A tag has been placed on Cliff Akurang requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Harland1 (t/c) 13:27, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

James Cole
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article James Cole, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of James Cole. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 21:00, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

Nicky Ioannou
I'm inclined to keep him - the FL appearances make him notable in my view: I'm not a deletionist generally, but I think a clear boundary should be set. To be honest I'm not sure of Ioannou's whereabouts - I don't recall the club ever saying anything. ArtVandelay13 (talk) 21:44, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Tim Trebes
An editor has nominated Tim Trebes, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 20:44, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Notability of non-playing footballers (AfD:Paul Rodgers (footballer))
Hello! You contributed to AfD:Paul Rodgers by voting to keep him. As you may know, WP:FOOTY is currently working to finalize a Notability criteria. One of the points of the current suggestion that are still being debated is more or less a translation of AfD:Paul Rodgers. I'm now trying to come up with a suggestion that summarizes this AfD, and would like you to comment on my interpretation of your arguments, and perhaps even discuss a suggestion. Thank you! Sebisthlm (talk) 20:24, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Removing redlinks
Please stop removing redlinks from articles (such as this edit) - redlinks are useful as it means we can find out where articles are missing. Qwghlm (talk) 14:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Phil Carpenter
Another editor has added the  template to the article Phil Carpenter, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:59, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Mikhael Jaimez-Ruiz
Hi, I've nominated this player for deletion as he doesn't meet notability at WP:Bio. The AfD discussion can be found here. --Jimbo[online] 12:57, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Peanut4 (talk) 20:52, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Barnet goal-keeper sub.
Was there an injury? Or an event that happened for that? Govvy (talk) 19:34, 6 September 2008 (UTC)

Ryan Burge
Another editor has added the  template to the article Ryan Burge, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Raven1977 (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Do you have a good debut citation for Burge to use on his page? Govvy (talk) 14:01, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Dates
Just wanted to let you know, there is a newish policy on Wiki, where we don't link to dates anymore and the dates for Barnet F.C. articles, should be in British format, dd-month-year. Regards Govvy (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

Burge
Hi, do you have a source for Burge being with Barnet on a non-contract basis? Neither this from Barnet website nor this from the BBC mention non-contract terms. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 21:50, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting back to me. The other possibility would be that Barnet gave him a short-term contract, say until the transfer window opened, and the review was to see if it should be extended. As you clearly know more about Barnet FC than I do, you're probably right, but I'm uncomfortable with saying something as definite as "only with the Bees on a non-contract basis" without an explicit source. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 17:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Neal Bishop
Please do not remove sourced material from articles, like on Neal Bishop. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)

Daniel Leach
Hi! It seems you recently created an unreferenced biography of a living person: Daniel Leach. Our verifiability policy requires that all content be cited to a reliable source. Please add references as soon as possible. Thanks! --LaraBot (talk) 00:10, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Hadley F.C.
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Hadley F.C., please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Hadley F.C. appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Hadley F.C. has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) and CC-BY-SA, under CC-BY-SA, or released into the public domain leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Quantpole (talk) 11:01, 3 August 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Will Viner
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Will Viner. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Will Viner. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:10, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Infobox updates
When updating infoboxes can you remember to update the pcupdate field too. Cheers, --Jimbo[online] 13:33, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Cg29692! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 23:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Carlos Miguel da Silva Júnior -

Copyright problem: London APSA F.C.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as London APSA F.C., but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.apsafc.co.uk/history.htm, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:London APSA F.C. and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, London APSA F.C., in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:London APSA F.C. with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:London APSA F.C.. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:London APSA F.C. saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Copyright concerns
Hello, Cg29692. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your proposed rewrite for London APSA F.C. has had to be deleted. Unfortunately, though I see you made an effort to create new text, it also copied from. For example, compare the following which you placed in the proposed rewrite: with the source:
 * Plans fell through as the Terence MacMillan Stadium in Newham was not up to standard and needed work before it could be used for senior football.
 * Plans fell through as the Newham Terence Macmillan stadium was not up to standard and needed work before it could be used for Senior Football.

We may use external websites as a source of information, but I'm afraid that changing a few words does not constitute rewriting content in your own words. It instead creates an unauthorized derivative work.

If you want to place information on the history of this club in the article, please be sure that you rewrite the content completely. Any brief excerpts you use must be clearly marked and used for good reasons such as those set out at the non-free content guideline. The essay Close paraphrasing contains some suggestions for rewriting that may help avoid these issues. The article Wikipedia Signpost/2009-04-13/Dispatches, while about plagiarism rather than copyright concerns, also contains some suggestions for reusing material from sources that may be helpful, beginning under "Avoiding plagiarism". --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon-Lewis Dickinson


The article Jon-Lewis Dickinson has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. &mdash; e. ripley\talk 13:23, 2 May 2010 (UTC)

Evander Holyfield
I think that you may have misread what the article says. Editors were continuing to refer to Holyfield as a "5 time World Champion", which we continued to correct to four. In the spirit of compromise, it was added that "whilst lightly regarded, the WBF belt has technically made Holyfield a 5 time champ in the heavyweight division". It still correctly states that he is a four time world heavyweight champ, and it states that he is "technically a 5 time (not world) heavyweight champ", which is also correct.Mk5384 (talk) 01:17, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Kurtney Brooks for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Kurtney Brooks, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kurtney Brooks until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --WFC-- 04:21, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Daniel Leach
Just so you know, Oregon State University is not a professional team so I moved to the youth slot in the infobox. College teams are not professional teams, just take note of that next time alright. – Michael (talk) 22:23, 12 November 2010 (UTC)

User:Rogga7
That nuisance has been reported to administrators for Vandalism. (Obvious Vandalism-only account;Vandalism after 4im or Level 4 warning)

Thanks for letting me know! He should be gone rather quickly. -- Binko71100 (talk) 19:31, 23 March 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013–14 Barnet F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oliver Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:England squad 2002 UEFA European Under-19 Football Championship
Template:England squad 2002 UEFA European Under-19 Football Championship has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. C 679 06:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Brydan Klein, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phuket (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
JMHamo (talk) 18:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Step 4 relegation
It doesn't actually make any difference, because it's not confirmed and can't be sourced. We have to wait until the reprieves are issued. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:15, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Are you the same editor that made that edit the first time? Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:17, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * That isn't possible because it's original research and making assumptions. We can't state what will "almost certainly" happen, regardless of how sure we are of it. There will be a number of reprieves across Steps 3 and 4, with VM, Hinckley and Thatcham on their way out, and no doubt one or two more. We just don't know how many will be relegated. Equally we can't say Three Bridges (or whoever it might be) definitely won't be relegated because it hasn't been specifically confirmed. The FA can still relegate that club if it so chooses. The best we can do is say that reprieves are likely and that not all clubs that finish in relegation spots will necessarily be relegated. I made a note like that on the Southern League article – even though that's also unsourced, it's not stating that something will definitely happen, it's just a pointer as to what's likely. Incidentally, it's better to log in when you edit, so people can see what you're doing. For example I've reverted you twice, but it looks like I've reverted two different editors, and that can sometimes have implications if there's a lot of reverting. Cheers, Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:40, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Also, can you explain why you've relegated Wakefield? Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:46, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * So they're not relegated. They're only relegated if they finish in a relegation place. Otherwise they've resigned. Not only that, but there's no reference, no explanation, nothing as to why they're going down. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Referencing is always required if something isn't clear, and the resignation of VM should be referenced on the Conference page. The NPL table looks good. I understand everything you're saying, and I basically agree with you, but in terms of this being an encyclopedia, we can't say anything that isn't explicitly backed up by sources. The FA rulebook doesn't say that Isthmian Div1S 22nd placed club will be reprieved, or won't be relegated, and working out PPG is WP:OR. Occasionally a club that is offered a reprieve doesn't take it, and goes down anyway. Maybe the 22nd placed club will go bust. We don't know. Plus, the rulebook does say that the club will be relegated first and then reprieved, not that they won't be relegated. So to say that the 22nd placed club won't be relegated is technically untrue, regardless of what we suspect will eventually happen. Bretonbanquet (talk) 20:48, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barnet F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Stack (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramil Sheriff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 13 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=618794839 your edit] to 2014–15 Barnet F.C. season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:55, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
 * | cellpadding="1" class="wikitable" style="font-size:95%;"
 * Agent {Later signed for 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Newport County

Disambiguation link notification for August 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Barnet F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Graham Stack. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 7 August 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 14
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Barnet F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Elliot Johnson. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014–15 Barnet F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Braintree. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 4 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramil Sheriff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 December 2014 (UTC)

January 2015
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kostas Kiassos, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. GiantSnowman 09:34, 18 January 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Ambox warning pn.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Kostas Kiassos. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. GiantSnowman 12:06, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kostas Kiassos. GiantSnowman 20:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Where are these stats referenced from? Why do you keep on changing the format of the infobox? GiantSnowman 20:31, 23 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ramil Sheriff, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enfield. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:51, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 13 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 14 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the 2015–16 Barnet F.C. season page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=675971916 your edit] caused a URL error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F675971916%7C2015–16 Barnet F.C. season%5D%5D Ask for help])

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of 2013–14 Barnet F.C. season for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2013–14 Barnet F.C. season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2013–14 Barnet F.C. season until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. REDMAN 2019 ( talk ) 12:42, 26 August 2020 (UTC)