User talk:Cganskewiki

Hello,

I am certainly not an expert of etiquette or process with Wikipedia, so I apologise if this is not the correct way to address this.

I have a page that was deleted for lack of notability. In an attempt to address this, we responded to the deletor with a number of articles, but we have not seen a response. We were mentioned in an article in the Miami Herald today, so we want to go through the undelete process, but we want to make sure that it will be well received.

It would be a great help to have some administrators validate that we are a good candidate for undeletion. Here are the details:

Page: BrainKeeper

Members of BrainKeeper will be speaking at the Under the Radar | Why Office 2.0 Matters conference, a notible industry event.

Articles to show Notability:


 * Miami Herald: Small Business Special Report, Gotta-Have Gadgets


 * UTR: Brainkeeper: Caffeinated Wiki


 * EContentMag: BrainKeeper Launches Enterprise Wiki


 * Gilbane IT News: BrainKeeper Releases Enterprise Wiki

Blogs to show Notability:


 * Mark Harvey: BrainKeeper Enterprise Wiki


 * FastForwardBlog: BrainKeeper to Launch: Is There Room for Another Wiki Maker?


 * Zoli Review of BrainKeeper

Client Testmonial:


 * Law Office Technology

This is not a complete list, as other press mentions could be considered partial or trivial, but the complete list of articles is here.

Do we have a solid case?

--Cganskewiki 15:56, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The procedure to get an article undeleted is presented at Deletion review. Note that information in Wikipedia articles needs to be attributed to a reliable source - in this case I would say newspapers and technology magazines. Blogs are not reliable sources. If the extent of the information from reliable sources is one or two snippets from newspapers then deletion may be inevitable. Most importantly, it is not a good idea to edit articles that you are personally associated with - see Conflict of interest.--Commander Keane 05:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC)