User talk:Cgb52/Point-In-Time Count

Peer Review Feedback
Everything in the article is relevant to the article topic, Point-In-Time Count. It was all to the point with no distractions. The article also remained neutral and just gave information without any tone or bias. Each viewpoint had its own good/same amount of information. Citations both works, but there should be points to these references in the article when used for the information being stated. No information is out of date. AshNB15 (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)