User talk:Cgranados72

April 2016
Your recent editing history at Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. —MelbourneStar ☆ talk 04:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

Welcome
Hi, and welcome to wikipedia. I saw your discussion over at Talk:Democratic Party presidential primaries, 2016 and I want to tell you not to get to riled up. This is how things go on wikipedia, you sometimes have to argue to include things, even if they seem obviously relevant to you :) It's sometimes long, painful and seemingly pointless, but it's necessary. Keep up your work, I see you back up your claims with multiple sources and that's certainly the way to go. Also, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is just a commonly cited unofficial policy. That's why it was called a "classic argument" and I'm sure it's not meant to be overly condescending, but sometimes we forget who is familiar with wikipedia's culture. Cheers. Abjiklɐm (tɐlk) 15:11, 6 April 2016 (UTC)