User talk:Cgriffioen

Hi, Cgriffioen, and welcome to both Wikipedia and INF1001! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. Here are some pages that you might find useful: If you're new to U of T, the best cheap, fresh coffee is at the Campus General Store across the street from Bissell (80 cents if you bring a mug), the great halls in University College and the Hart House library are the best and most serene places to read, and the two most important people to get to know at the Faculty of Information are Christine Chan at the front desk, and Aida, the cleaning lady.--Gabby.resch (talk) 15:52, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * An even more extensive resource for editing
 * What makes a topic worthy of inclusion
 * How to write a great article
 * Help pages
 * Evolution of an article

Survey
Hi Cgriffioen!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 21:27, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Moral rights
Hi Cgriffioen! Per your request, I've reviewed your edit to this article. You've mostly added pertinent and reliable references, which is great. However, I'm not sure the OED ref in the introduction is the best choice - generally you would want a secondary source (like a journal) that discusses moral rights rather than a simple dictionary definition of "moral". Most of your references are correctly formatted, but you should avoid using "bare URLs" as refs (ie. just the URL, no info on the page itself); if the link goes dead or the website is rearranged, it becomes much more difficult to find it again. For a web ref it's good practice to include a minimum of title, URL, publisher/author and date you accessed the source. If you like, you can check out RefToolbar, or just format it manually. Be sure to use double apostrophes, not quotation marks, for italics. The section on Articles on moral rights might work better as a further reading section. Overall, though, great start! Nikkimaria (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)