User talk:ChMc

In the first section the three notes "citation needed" are unnecessary. The sentences are stating mathematically obvious facts:

1. "An accurate interpretation of such a chart, however, cannot be expected" As the starting point is arbitrary (previous sentence) it's stating the obvious.

2. "Commonly, houses one through six are below the horizon ... but some systems may not respect entirely that division (in particular when the Ascendant does not coincide with the first house's cusp)" As the Ascendent is the sign rising, if it does not coincide with the first house's cusp the relationship will obviously be out of kilter.

3. "The differences arise from which fundamental plane is the object of the initial division and whether the divisions represent units of time, or degrees of distance." Again this is stating something that is clear to anyone with a grasp of spherical trigonometry. (Perhaps more helpful than a citation might be an explanation.)