User talk:ChRoseP22/Faye Harrison

Hey y'all! I found an article about how Faye Harrison taught through theatre and performance. Could be something cool to highlight in her career as an educator and the alternative way she taught; called "Anthro-performance". Transforming Anthropology. ChRoseP22 (talk) 01:11, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Looks really good everyone! :D ChRoseP22 (talk) 19:50, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

One thing to change is the order of her educator section. Wikipedia likes it in chronological order, not reverse chronological order like it is now. I can do it later, just wanted to make sure the link to the guidelines is available to be referenced. AtinCabur (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2021 (UTC)

Professor Garth's Peer Review of Faye Harrison Page:

Hi all-- you have done a wonderful job on this. It is exactly what I was hoping you would do. I think your next step is to take this beyond a resume/CV style page to one that gives us a feel for who she is as a scholar. One area where you could expand is to read through more of Harrison's work, get a general idea of what she has argued and what her contributes to the field of anthropology have been and then find a way to incorporate some general statements about what her work is about into the page. You could add to the lead section to get a general feel for her arguments or to the scholar section. If you can find any personal info that has credible citations you can add those as well. Also since wikipedia likes balance if there have been any critiques of her work--which you would find in book reviews written by others about her books--you could add those to a "Critique" section. Check out Naomi Klein's page to see an example where her work and views are included in the page.

Hi Professor Garth

Thank you! I actually thought we weren't supposed to use her works so I was trying to rely only on secondary sources. It helps to know that we can cite her work.AtinCabur (talk) 23:19, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

peer review by Dominique Montoya

The structure for the page is quite strong and nicely organized. I like how there is the original work in the introduction to see what changes y'all expanded to make the page stick out more. I also want to comment on how detailed everything is within the page and how the tone is neutral. However, I would like to see more details in the Educator section because it seems like it's unfinished, but the information so far is good! I like how y'all add the part of her major publication because that is valid and important for people to see how much this woman accomplishes. One thing I suggest is to maybe put together the major publication section with the awards and honors section because both seem to have the same mean in my eyes, but still, I like the format of the page. Overall, I actually learned a lot from reading the page so far, so keep up the good work!

Sarah Cooper's Peer Review: This article is so well structured and is set up to include a very well-rounded picture of her! I also really like how you all took the time to edit the already existing information in the published article. I think the only things I can think of to add would be things mentioned already, like more information on her early/personal life/ and the specific ideas she is passionate about in her publications and scholarship. Essentially, just a general adding of information to fully flesh out the article. Nice! Scooper36 (talk) 03:52, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hi group! A wikipedian has gone in and added a lot of new information to the current lead. I have copied it over so we can edit and look over it. I think we might me able to cut it down a little since we have directed a lot of this information to various sections. ChRoseP22 (talk) 22:14, 27 May 2021 (UTC)