User talk:Chaabano

Speedy deletion nomination of File:///I:/Qawl document RN is working on.doc


A tag has been placed on File:///I:/Qawl document RN is working on.doc requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:44, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Chaabano, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Al-Ahbash have been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 03:06, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Al-Ahbash has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:30, 6 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Al-Ahbash was changed by Chaabano (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908503 on 2017-01-06T09:30:42+00:00.

Your help desk question
You have a response.— Vchimpanzee  •  talk  •  contributions  •  20:00, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Al-Ahbash, you may be blocked from editing. '' Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. '' McKhan (talk) 05:17, 17 January 2017 (UTC) &#9940; You are placing wrong information here to Al-Ahbash page ,the wrong information will continue to be corrected with proofs provided by me, but you have been bios to Al-Ahbash page which is not permitted in Wikipedia, furthermore, I will request a third party from Wikipedia to look into your claims. I have been listing reality here. My corrections will continue and let a third neutral party decide. You must stop re-editing this page with fake and wrong facts. Please stop messing up to the Page of Al-Ahbash yourself. You are not being neutral at all. If so, why are you listing only bios information about Al-Ahbash but withholding incriminating details about other groups ? This is called bios and not neutral.
 * , I have answered you here. Thank you. McKhan (talk) 07:36, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Al-Ahbash, you may be blocked from editing. '' Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. '' McKhan (talk) 07:41, 17 January 2017 (UTC)What a discussion which is one side, it is not you who decide if i am a new user or not, Wikipedia can easily find out who I am which not being hidden? Furthermore, if you claim to be neutral and not being bios, then why are you arguing for me listing my side which is based on facts?

Your recent editing history at Al-Ahbash shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   10:07, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

&#9774;&#9774;McKhan Following the recommendation and guidelines of Mr Oshwah I am not here to start edit war but I am here to reach consensus that was why I listed the peace sign &#9774; please let me know if you are willing to reach consensus an agreement with some middle grounds or you are deadlock with your decision that you don't want me to edit the page to show points of view for all the groups mentioned in Al-Ahbash page which include articles published by news papers and other supporting documentations.&#9774;Chaabano (talk) 23:20, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

Not free speech
I suggest you read WP:NOTFREESPEECH Wikipedia is owned and operated by wp:Wikimedia Foundation It is their server. If you wish to exercise your right to free speech, I suggest you do so elsewhere. Here you are bound by wp:policy Also, please read wp:consensus. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:08, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Jim1138 Yes I agree it is not a free speech but rather based on fact and discussion, if you take one of these then, it will be much difficult to reach a consensus. But I am trying to work it out and did not loose hope. I am requesting the removal of Tariq Ramadan comments against the group for being sarcastic, bios and hatred to the Al-ahbash groups. Without mentioning contradicting Tariq's comments, the article will have one sided opinion of a controversial person such as Tariq Ramadan.Chaabano (talk) 10:14, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at Requests for permissions/Confirmed. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. '' You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you purposefully and blatantly harass a fellow Wikipedian. Please, refrain from making such frivolous, libelous and utterly baseless statements which you made here. Thank you.'' McKhan (talk) 18:44, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * McKhan Now you claim I started attacking you ? what about your attacks against me since I have started editing? what have you been doing all along ? All your writing you have listed in the {Talk] page are not criticism ,attacks or harassment ? I get it ,you are a veteran Wikipedia user and I am not but you still think I am an old user or someone's else pretending to be me !! Isn't odd that you found new Wikipedia comers like myself do not know the policy well where you immediately and as soon as you noticed my editing did not like it and started looking for issues to discredit me. Then as a new user I of course had many technical mistakes where you did not wait for Wikipedia to correct them except jumped right away and started issuing warnings against me.

What do you call that something nice ? You wrote very much all the warnings with stop and hand signs in RED, yet few days later I used the peace sign instead to show you my sincere intention, but even that did not work out. Some of the attacks which is not good and as you were educating me about being nice to fellow Wikipedia users, Why did you mention that I am an old user or that maybe a user called Abdul Alqader or some one else as disruptive and continue writing to me " if I continue editing, I maybe blocked by Wikipedia"? why don't you apply that to yourself since you are a veteran user? Are you Wikipedia Administrator ? let Wikipedia decides not you ? It is very strange and weird in deed. You are being persistent yet after I have stopped doing editing you have continued trying to discredit me because I dare to challenge your article about Al-Ahbash and continued defending very much [Tariq Ramadan] bogus and hatred comments against such groups. I found most of the page is full of bogus ,fake ,bios and against one group over another. Please See here Quote. So I am going to stop addressing you and will focus on the Al-Ahbash page. This is the Talk page all about reaching a resolution. Since I have filed a remediation ,please follow up with the third party remediation, I am sure they have much more experience than me in this field. Chaabano (talk) 23:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)