User talk:Chabotfan

Welcome!

Hello, Chabotfan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Lorne Chabot does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!   Ravenswing   05:38, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Proposed deletion of Lorne Chabot hall of fame


The article Lorne Chabot hall of fame has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Essay, not a how to.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GregJackP  Boomer!   01:06, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
You may have noticed that your edits on the Chabot article are being routinely reverted now. That is because you are consistently not following Wikipedia's rules and guidelines concerning neutral point of view and editorializing, never mind including downright inaccuracies. I urge you to review the links I posted to you back in November and gain a better understanding about editing articles. As it stands, however, your edits will continue to be routinely reverted as long as you stray from verified, sourced facts about Chabot's life and career in favor of using Wikipedia as a fan page.   Ravenswing   20:28, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did to 1927–28 NHL season, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.   Ravenswing   20:34, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Dave Kerr, you may be blocked from editing.   Ravenswing   20:35, 5 January 2013 (UTC)