User talk:Chadwickferguson

A page you started has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Caring Hands Learning Centers, Chadwickferguson!

Wikipedia editor Dipankan001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Hello, this is Dipankan001. This is to notify you that I have reviewed your article, Caring Hands Learning Centers, and feel there should be some more references. Please do so if possible. All the best. @ Dipankan Upgraded!  Tag me!   07:19, 27 October 2012 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Dipankan001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy deletion nomination of Caring Hands Learning Centers
Hello Chadwickferguson,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Caring Hands Learning Centers for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:24, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Sequim, Washington
People should have a Wikipedia page in order to be on lists. There are exceptions. See wp:listpeople wp:wtaf Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:39, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Caring Hands Learning Centers
No, you are not exempt for being non-profit. wp:notability is the primary criteria here. What does it contribute to Wikipedia? Is it just self promotional material? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:13, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Whoa don't make rules up like being "not profit" just review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#A7 "An article about a real person, individual animal(s), organization or web content that does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, with the exception of educational institutions." --Chadwickferguson (talk) 08:17, 27 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Are you a educational institution? As such, you cannot represent YOUR Institution. Wikipedia has a rule where people with individual accounts can edit; others representing a group can't. @ Dipankan  Upgraded!  Tag me!   10:56, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Chadwickferguson. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:05, 27 October 2012 (UTC)