User talk:Chafas

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~ ; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! ++Lar: t/c 20:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

IBM PureQuery
This seems to be the only thing you've contributed so far. I hope you choose to edit additional articles as well. I wonder if you work for IBM? (so do I). Please keep the Wikipedia conflict of interest policy in mind. I've commented on the talk page of the article that I think the IBM logo ought to be removed. Again welcome and thanks for your contributions. ++Lar: t/c 20:33, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Nice pureQuery, Data Studio articles
Could you link the Data Studio articles from the new Template:IBM_DB2_product_family once they are ready? Thanks.:-)

Lpetrazickis (talk) 20:38, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

Will do, but can you please update the Tools names to reflect the Optim 2.2 names?

Speedy deletion of User:Chafas/Sandbox/InfoSphere Data Architect
A tag has been placed on User:Chafas/Sandbox/InfoSphere Data Architect, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexius08 (talk) 04:38, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of IBM PureQuery


The article IBM PureQuery has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:34, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of IBM PureQuery for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IBM PureQuery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/IBM PureQuery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 13:25, 18 May 2016 (UTC)