User talk:Chaitanya Nuthalapati

Improvements needed at Sree Seetha Ramachandra Swamy Vaari Devasthanam
Please cite your sources, see WP:REFB for how to do this.

Also, please clarify what District and State of India the temple is in. Place this information in the first sentence of your article. MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:51, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sri Seetha Rama Swami Devalayam


The article Sri Seetha Rama Swami Devalayam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and not enough detail to clearly locate or identify subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 12:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sree Seetha Ramachandra Swamy Vaari Devasthanam


The article Sree Seetha Ramachandra Swamy Vaari Devasthanam has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and not enough detail to clearly locate or identify subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 12:48, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

The two temple articles
I have proposed these two articles for deletion as it is unclear from them whether their subjects are notable. I suspect they may even be describing the same temple; the names are almost the same, the locations and parts of the descriptions very similar. If not it is unclear the relationship between them, if any. If you can clarify this, ideally with proper sources, then maybe one or both of the articles can be kept. But as-is it’s hard to see how they are helpful as articles.-- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 12:54, 15 March 2017 (UTC)