User talk:Chaklasiyaharsh

Speedy deletion nomination of TicketCorner.in


A tag has been placed on TicketCorner.in, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising,. Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit |the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mean as custard (talk) 09:34, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harsh Chaklasiya
Hello Chaklasiyaharsh,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Harsh Chaklasiya for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.  Ish dar  ian  10:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Notability, promotional tones, and editing on yourself
Hi- I thought I would point you towards WP:COI, which goes over our policies on editing with a conflict of interest. The problem with editing with a COI is that often people will edit with good intentions but have a promotional or non-neutral tone to their editing. It might not be intentional, but it would still be a problem since we have to have the pages read as neutral and encyclopedic. The page for your company TicketCorner came across as a promotional page because it used phrases such as "first of its kind" and "engaging". These terms are perfectly acceptable for press releases or your own website, but it just isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. It's a pretty common mistake for new users to make, as adapting to editing styles can be a little difficult. I know that this is something that I had issues with when I first began editing and something that I still have to watch for as far as my own writing style goes.

The other problem is that neither page you created had notability established by way of reliable sourcing. By this I mean that you or your company received substantial coverage in reliable sources such as say, the Times of India or PC Magazine. All articles must have reliable sources in order to pass notability guidelines. Primary sources such as your website can't show notability, nor can database entries or blog posts by non-notable persons or confirmed authorities. A good place to look for help as far as reliable sources go would be the Reliable sources/Noticeboard. You might also want to try going to WP:INDIA as there are multiple editors there that know where to look for good reliable sources in various languages. However if there are no current sources out there, I do want to warn you that existing is not notability. Hopefully this will help explain some of the reasons your page was deleted. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   11:04, 14 September 2013 (UTC)