User talk:Chalco2450

Welcome!
Hello, Chalco2450, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Betty Logan (talk) 20:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Television content rating system
Chalco, please stop altering the highlighting at Television content rating system. Some of your changes are making the ratings inconsistent with the table key. I have provided a full explanation at Talk:Television_content_rating_system, and I would appreciate it if you joined the discussion rather repeatedly restoring your edit. Betty Logan (talk) 20:45, 8 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Once again you have edited at Television content rating system in a manner that makes the ratings inconsistent with the key.
 * Would you mind explaining why you changed the highlighting for the Netherlands "6 rating" from purple to black? What part of the summary at Television_content_rating_system indicates that the "6" rating is a different type of rating to the the "12" and "16" ratings. Since you have not provided a rationale for your alteration it is impossible to follow your logic.
 * Would you care to explain why you changed the highlighting for the US's TV-MA rating from purple to black. Television_content_rating_system states that TV-MA programs are "intended to be viewed by adults and therefore may be unsuitable for children under 17". Would you not agree this is an advisory rating and not a prohibitive one? Why then did you alter the highlighting effectively changing the rating from an avisory category to a prohibitive one?
 * Would you also explain why you changed the text color for "N/A" in the US entry from black to white, effectively making it invisible?
 * These are bewildering edits and you have offered no explanation for them. Would you please explain your reasoning to me, and from now on will you also use edit summaries to explain why you are making certain changes? Betty Logan (talk) 01:47, 31 July 2018 (UTC)