User talk:ChambaKikii/sandbox

Ahlam's Peer Review
A lead section that is easy to understand:
 * The lead would be derivative of the first sentence in the outline. If the article expands on that point, the lead would be easy to understand and concise.

A clear structure:
 * The outline posted suggests an easy to follow wiki page that is relevant and not written about.
 * The first line has an unfinished thought. The outline would lead better if it was removed or completed.

Balanced coverage:
 * I think the content is divided well but without more content it's difficult to say it would be balanced.

Neutral content:
 * Content would be nuetral except for the pros and cons part. The authors may have trouble writing the pros and cons section if it is created with strongly held values. I would not include it.

Reliable sources: Qurrahh (talk) 08:20, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
 * In the technical section, there are quite a few reliable sources. Nothing is written on the topic though yet to cross reference validity of references.