User talk:Champion/Archive 2017

User talk: Eubot and Twinkle
I reverted the last 500 edits on that page, removing between 300k and 400k bytes, and reducing the number of sections from the 600s to the 100s. Almost all of those edits were automated Twinkle edits for the redirect deletion. Is that okay? HotdogPi 16:56, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
 * I'd prefer you archive the noticies to a separate page for future reference, for I have a bunch of lists of redirects that I (and need to keep an eye on, if I notice any redlinks, I'd just go and remove them off the list. Thanks. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Re:RfD/Eubot
Thanks! Can't promise how much of my time I'll be able to spend on it, since I have multiple long-term, large-scale, eternally-repetitive tasks I'm involved with either permanently or from time to time, but I should be able to put some time in it at least every now and then. From time to time I need a break from the other things anyway. Found your lists of Eubot redirects. To avoid repeating your work or having you needlessly repeat mine, any preference for which list I pick to start from? Also, would it be acceptable if I edit whichever list I end up working from to mark the ones I've checked and either found valid or listed at RfD, so it's easier at a glance to see which ones I've either not yet checked or was uncertain about? I'd leave the actual list in-tact, not gonna remove stuff from it, probably would just put ✔️ or something similar at the start of the ones done, and something like (RfD) with a link to the discussion for those posted to RfD. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 04:46, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Any list will do, but I suggest you begin with 18 for that one is almost done with and work your way backwards, and that way is just fine with me, but a list entry should be removed if it deleted/kept at RfD or certain that it will be kept, the progress meter should be updated accordingly, also, if you are not sure about any of them, just make a new section and move them there. Thanks. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 04:59, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Sounds fine. There's no consensus either way yet for the em-dash/double-hyphen cases or the ligatures like Æ/AE, from what I can tell. Any other cases I'd better either hold off on entirely or at most put up a small batch of to check consensus?
 * Does 'certain it will be kept' include all cases of blatantly valid redirect, or solely those where similar eubot-created cases have actually been 'tested' against RfD? AddWittyNameHere (talk) 05:21, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I suggest you ask for he has been doing a lot of this, I can't recall any of these at the top of my head, thanks. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 05:43, 4 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see, I see. Oh well, there's enough stuff in there that I am sure ought to be RfDed-and-deleted that I'll focus on those for now. In the mean time I've listed a couple more at RfD, found two clearly valid no-diacritic redirs and removed them from the list & added a quick link to the RfD discussion for all ongoing discussions for list 18. AddWittyNameHere (talk) 06:00, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

CSD X1 & X2
Just a note, when tagging for speedy deletion under the temporary criteria CSD X1 & X2, you can use the standard templates  &  . These templates will properly tag and categorize the target for deletion. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 01:50, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of On the other hand


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on On the other hand requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Animalparty! (talk) 01:51, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Champion

 * Thank you for the greeting, but I don't think I've seen you in the areas that I've edited. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:21, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * no, you are correct, but I do appreciate what you are doing for the project. Lotje (talk) 08:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

An RfD you may be interested in commenting on
Hello Champion. Just interested to know what your opinion is on this Rfd concerning George W. Bush (disambiguation). Regards, and have a Happy New Year!--Nev&eacute;–selbert 01:11, 10 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, thanks. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:20, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Page move for Presidential Office Building
Hello,

I have completed this request successfully.

Thanks! --  Dane talk  04:10, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Trump
For your future reference, it might be helpful to put forward an argument favoring your proposal when making a proposal. Just saying. --В²C ☎ 16:29, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Presidential and Vice Presidential March listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Presidential and Vice Presidential March. Since you had some involvement with the Presidential and Vice Presidential March redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ( talk ) 14:34, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I only created the redirect after coming across this. I think a DRV might have to be opened for I didn't get to respond. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 23:48, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * I will open a DRV without prejudice. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:23, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey
Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Trumpcare Redirect
I suggested another redirect for Trumpcare. I think it works better and can find quick consensus.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2017_March_8 Casprings (talk) 15:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Mrs. Donald Trump listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mrs. Donald Trump. Since you had some involvement with the Mrs. Donald Trump redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --Nev&eacute;–selbert 22:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Deletion review for Nigerian prince
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Nigerian prince. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Steel1943 (talk) 23:39, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Angus (name)
I'm not sure why you created, but I've retargeted it to Angus (disambiguation). Per WP:APOTITLE, the "(name)" disambiguator is used for both given names and surnames, not just given names, and Angus (surname) exists. If you get an itch for creating these in the future, please be careful of this distinction. Thanks, -- Tavix ( talk ) 00:09, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I didn't double check, thanks. I thought I just got a message relating to the discussion I closed before (see above), because I felt I had enough on that affair. (Are you stalking my contributions? ) -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:11, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation pages
Hello, Champion. When you changed the ABC TV redirect so that its target was a disambiguation page, you may not have been aware of WP:FIXDABLINKS, which says:
 * When creating disambiguation pages, fix all resulting mis-directed links.
 * Before moving an article to a qualified name (in order to create a disambiguation page at the base name, to move an existing disambiguation page to that name, or to redirect that name to a disambiguation page), click on What links here to find all of the incoming links. Repair all of those incoming links to use the new article name.

It would be a great help if you would check the other Wikipedia articles that contain links to "ABC TV" and fix them to take readers to the correct article. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:30, 15 March 2017 (UTC)

very funny
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#User:Champion_nominated_Barack_Obama_for_deletion

Siuenti (talk) 00:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * OK you are trying to do something funny. Did you somehow trick me into thinking there was an AFD banner on Barack Obama? Or was that a side-effect? Siuenti (talk) 00:42, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I deliberately did not place an AfD banner on that, but the AfD pagges almost immediately got deleted. Also see this -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * OK the banner I removed was a side effect. Hilarious. Siuenti (talk) 00:47, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Overdone trout
KATMAKROFAN (talk) 02:28, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

Discussion invite
Hello. I invite you to join a centralized discussion about naming issues related to China and Taiwan. Szqecs (talk) 14:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Miscapitalized redirects
Hi, my attempt to discuss redirects like Barack obama was not a joke, please re-open that discussion and explain why they are "clearly useful" and to whom. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 08:13, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Actually never mind. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 08:41, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Shutdown.exe


The article Shutdown.exe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * WP:NOTMANUAL - nuff said.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. « « «  SOME GADGET GEEK  » » » (talk) 20:07, 19 April 2017 (UTC)

MfD nomination of User:Champion/Eubot list 15
User:Champion/Eubot list 15, a page which you created or substantially contributed to (or which is in your userspace), has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Champion/Eubot list 15 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Champion/Eubot list 15 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Si Trew (talk) 15:54, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Did you notice Eubot List 15 went red? ****welll done*** old bean. Still trogging through them. Si Trew (talk) 08:42, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have speedy closed this MfD as keep per your comment, Champion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 21:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

RfD today
ummm... I think I may have taken the whole page out by mistake. Can you repair? I'll stand off.
 * I have placed a request at WP:REFUND. Just letting you know. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:48, 21 April 2017 (UTC)
 * I have no idea what that means. I think it means you say sorry or something.
 * Right, something I deleted or something. No problem User:Champion. That would have gone by consensus of community I have to look at that later. My eyes are on champion list 11 which I broke into ten sections and I am at section "about 6000" I have moved the thermometer up to 50%, let me focus on that and not be distracted. Si Trew (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

tips wings
I make some lunch let you take over at RfD rather than me ec all the time, OK

Capitals of the Netherlands listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Capitals of the Netherlands. Since you had some involvement with the Capitals of the Netherlands redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 23:22, 20 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

not an attack page.
How was my user page an attack page in any way? How did I threaten or even dislike Donald Trump in any way? I wrote the explanation that It's based on an inside joke, but deleting non-threatening account pages and then THREATENING me with blocking is kind of ironic. Donald Trung (talk) 13:36, 28 May 2017 (UTC) in It's entirety:

"G10. Pages that disparage, threaten, intimidate, or harass their subject or some other entity, and serve no other purpose

Shortcut: WP:G10 Main page: Wikipedia:Attack page Examples of "attack pages" may include libel, legal threats, material intended purely to harass or intimidate a person or biographical material about a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced. These pages should be speedily deleted when there is no neutral version in the page history to revert to. Both the page title and page content may be taken into account in assessing an attack. Articles about living people deleted under this criterion should not be restored or recreated by any editor until the biographical article standards are met. Redirects from plausible search terms are not eligible under this criterion. For example, a term used on the target page to refer to its subject is often a plausible redirect – see Wikipedia:RNEUTRAL."

There is not a single thing on this list that my account page could've been considered guilty of, it didn't attack him, I don't even hate Donald Trump, I literally stayed at one of his hotels once, and my friends joke that I'm his cousin because our names sound so similar (I live and work in Australia and adopted the name "Donald" back in 1992 and I've been joked about being related to Donald Trump a couple of years after. It's like saying that if your name is King, and you joke about being a relative of Stephen King that you're threatening Stephen King, how is that rational in anyone's mind? Donald Trung (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Not sure why you have a personal vendetta against me...
I see that you also reported my username for no reason given, neither have you contacted me to ask about my name, and since I haven't been active with this account for more than a day (as I got sick of my rotating IP address), I don't see how you adding me to that list is even regulation. Donald Trung (talk) 14:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

please stop...
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Donald Trung (talk) 15:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Malaysia Airlines Flight 128


The article Malaysia Airlines Flight 128 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Disruptive passengers are fairly common so hardly notable enough for a mention never mind an article - wikipedia is not a news feed

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 09:15, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Malaysia Airlines Flight 128 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Malaysia Airlines Flight 128 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Malaysia Airlines Flight 128 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:33, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Liberal bias listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Liberal bias. Since you had some involvement with the Liberal bias redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Rupert Loup (talk) 16:31, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

Champion (alt)
Can you let me know if this is a legitimate alt account that you created? I saw its creation in the new user logs, and I wanted to make sure in order to keep your account safe from impersonation. Let me know :-)  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:21, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Geez, that was quick, yes it really is me, as I wrote on the userpage myself, and also modified the page for my main account, cheers. ---  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:23, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Perfect! Just wanted to make sure - thanks for letting me know. Happy Friday, dude! :-D  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:33, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Fox news
Use talk please.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:56, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Also, first you said "UNDUE", then you changed it to "no counter viewpoints"... it really seems like you're just trying to come up with excuses for WP:IJUSTDONTLIKEIT.Volunteer Marek (talk) 06:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I did not change anything, that was merely additional clarification on my actions, anyway, I feel accusing me of such claims on my talk page does not get anyone anywhere and is simply a waste of time. Regards. ---  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 07:04, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Trump - Accusations of bigotry and racism
Could you please let me know why you erased the section of accusations of bigotry under Trump. This topic has been under discussion for days in the Talk page. It seems clear that most users think that this is a serious issue. Although there is disagreement about the truth value of statements such as "Donald Trump is a racist", no-one has yet denied that this is a matter of public debate. Therefore, the facts about the accusations and the record of Trump's behavior should be included in his article. Avisnacks (talk) 08:15, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The discussion has not been closed and there is no clear consensus. Also note that there is only an informal discussion and no formal RfC on the topic yet. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 08:37, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Mini-Donald listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Mini-Donald. Since you had some involvement with the Mini-Donald redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. BDD (talk) 20:25, 23 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Articles for deletion/Emperor Entertainment Group
Hi, could you explain why you relisted this discussion: the general rule is that we relist twice unless there is a strong reason otherwise. The last relist by was intended to allow previous participants a chance to weigh in on whether they still favoured deletion: none who commented changed their opinion, and all the new participants favoured deletion and had policy-based rationales. This seems like a case where it would have been best to let an admin assess the consensus rather than do a third relist. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I meant to relist a different discussion, I've now forgotten which one I was meant to relist, anyway, feel free to revert my edits. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 06:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Not a problem: would you mind reverting them yourself? I'd prefer not to since I'm involved in that conversation. Thanks for the quick reply. TonyBallioni (talk) 06:21, 28 August 2017 (UTC)

Deplorable
There's no Wikipedia article for that term, so what's wrong with pointing it to the Hillary article with a Wiktionary hatnote? WP:NOTDICTIONARY. Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 15:54, 6 September 2017 (UTC)

Find (DOS)
Hi. I think the page views link in your move template broke, it doesn't show Find (command) the competing DOS article in page results. I have posted the full page views link in my support. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:04, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

hello
hello I need assistance with article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Earl E. Smith (talk • contribs)
 * If somebody needs assistance (in this case because you tagged an article the user wrote with ), don't just revert them without discussing it - it's rude. (I have userfied the article in question). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Firstly, this message was initially left on the TOP of my talk page, other than that, the only reason I reverted it is that it was not specified what exactly the assistance is and I thought that the editor left the message for an uninvolved person, thank you for understanding. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 00:08, 16 September 2017 (UTC)

Adding signature
Thanks for the note. I will be sure to add my signature to comments. Thanks again. --EC Racing (talk) 15:40, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Speedy deletion declined: Eleanor Nathan
Hello Champion. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Eleanor Nathan, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: notable husband = valid merge/redirect target per WP:ATD => ineligible for speedy deletion. Thank you.  So Why  07:12, 20 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Also, please do try to follow WP:BEFORE even when tagging for speedy deletion. In this case I was able to find two books explicitly covering her life on multiple pages with a short Google Books search and I have now expanded the article to be eligible for WP:DYK. Regards  So Why  08:58, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

PROD of Muffin_(proxy)
Hi. I won't oppose deletion of that article. Thanks for cleaning up WP! Fireice (talk) 01:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. -  C HAMPION  (talk) (contributions) (logs) 01:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Political map


Hello, Champion. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Political map".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing.  T K K ! bark with me! 16:14, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Happy holidays!
Marquardtika (talk) 06:17, 21 December 2017 (UTC)