User talk:Champisthebest123

September 2019
Hello, I'm JudeccaXIII. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Richard II of England have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:38, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard II of England. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:40, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard II of England, you may be blocked from editing. JudeccaXIII (talk) 21:42, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Richard II of England. --   LuK3      (Talk)   21:43, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Richard II of England shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Escape Orbit (Talk) 21:47, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 22:22, 1 September 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at Richard II of England. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. → Aza Toth 22:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)