User talk:Chan f.c.

December 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pappy & Harriet's has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pappy & Harriet's was changed by Chan f.c. (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.885839 on 2014-12-24T13:50:42+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Juliettes Literatursalon, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Valenciano (talk) 14:03, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica, you may be blocked from editing. Valenciano (talk) 14:39, 24 December 2014 (UTC)

Discussion at WP:ANI
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding legal threats made at Talk:Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica. The thread is Legal threats at Talk:Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica. Thank you. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:36, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

February 2015
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. -- GB fan 13:48, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

About the Block reason
Actually although I am an alumni of UNEM and involved with the school, but that not mean I have conflict of interest and cannot make neutrality discussion. This is because what I say is a FACT.

UNEM is regionally accredited from State (Ministry of Public Education) and by approval of its charter from CONESUP is a FACT. It still on the list of CONESUP is a FACT. But the diploma mill accusation is NOT a Fact, it's just a rumor without strong supporting evidence!

Moreover, is "Costa Rica Star" a public newspaper with public credibility? Or is a small private online newspaper that like to gather some grapevine or rumor? Why "Costa Rica Star" editorial staff is sufficient enough to make argument that just quote from a discussion forum?

And of course, if I write Cambridge is diploma mill, it will be laughed out of the forum, but this is just because Cambridge is very famous school. But instead, many small university is not known by public, it is commonly have not well-intentioned criticism or Malicious attacks in some online discussion forum.

At last, Wikipedia not like discussion forum, that's because Wikipedia have strong public credibility and strong influence. In discussion forum, I can write anything that I want to say, and I no need to responsible for my opinion. But Wikipedia is different, what be written in Wikipedia have strong influence to some person and some organization. And Wikipedia not like some small online private newspaper, that newspaper can write something without strong supporting reference, but I don't think Wikipedia will be the same.

This is my opinion, I believe Wikipedia should be a responsible enterprise, and make any argument with careful argumentation, not just some grapevine or rumor, or some online essay opinion without supporting reference.

If Wikipedia accept some rumor without proper evidence to draw conclusion about a person or an organization, that should be illegal about libel to the person or an organization.

Thank you for your kind attention!

About the Block Reason
Actually I try to discuss the article in the talk page for UNEM, you block me to discuss in the talk page obviously is not suitable.
 * You are completely missing the point here. You have not been blocked for a simple discussion or for disagreeing with other editors. You have been blocked for making an explicit legal threat to the other editors if they do not change the article to your preferred version:
 * "Any loss due to this article caused, as an alumni committee member of UNEM, we will try to sue Wikipedia for the compensation!"
 * Please read No legal threats carefully. It explains why you have been blocked. You will only be unblocked if you make an explicit statement here on your talk page that you completely and unreservedly withdraw your threat of legal action. Voceditenore (talk) 14:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

That's ok. I am not willing to sue Wikipedia, but I want to make constructive argument about that.

I can make the explicit statement here: I completely and unreservedly withdraw my threat of legal action. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chan f.c. (talk • contribs) 14:40, 4 February 2015‎
 * Since you have explicitly withdrawn the legal threat, I have unblocked you. You need to discuss what changes you want to make without threatening anyone.  -- GB fan 17:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)

Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica
Hi.. Have you seen your edition https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Universidad_Empresarial_de_Costa_Rica&action=history was reversed? Ramdiesel (talk) 16:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Yes, I have seen that. And I created article in talk page to discuss about that.