User talk:Chanakaj

Removing content
Hi Chanakaj. When removing content (like your recent edit on Orion (Metallica song), please use the edit summary to explain why you are doing so. Rufous 11:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Speedy Deletion Contested
I contested your use of Speedy Delete on Talk:American_Nihilist_Underground_Society. You didn't really give a good explanation and there is a history there which you seemed to have ignored. --TrollHistorian 06:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:TownHall3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:TownHall3.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 08:04, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Edit Summaries
I have noticed that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! —Travis C / T \ U  12:15, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Ranjit Fernando
Please stop adding non-encyclopaedic and point-of-view details to the article. Your changes have been reverted. &mdash;Moondyne 04:53, 30 April 2007 (UTC) I rectract that - sorry. Your edits were made in good faith, but are not suitable for an encylopaedia. &mdash;Moondyne 05:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)