User talk:Chandlerjoeyross/Archive 1

AfD nomination of To Take a Bullet for the President
I have nominated To Take a Bullet for the President, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/To Take a Bullet for the President. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Gwernol 00:55, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Robert Tetsu
A tag has been placed on Robert Tetsu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:59, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles without sources
Please don't create articles without sources, as you did with Earl Greenburg. And especially don't include claims about sexuality with a source - regardless of whether the person is dead or not. Pairadox (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok Thanks i will argree with the articles without sources but in the obituary it says his former partner Rich ... and his life partner David ...... There for i only stated his sexuality due to the charities he worked with for his deceased partner. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Hello
Thanks for the barnstar. As for the navbar issue: sure you can use the template. Actually, mine was a modified version of User:Compwhizii's. Happy editing! Editorofthewiki (talk) 22:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

  Edit Navigation bar

Journalists
Hello. I've noticed that you are interested in journalists, even competing with me to see who would create Alaa Abdulkareem Fartusi first.:) On that same subject, I would like to offer you an invitation to create Pierre Billaud. I've been wanting to create it for a while now but never really got around to it. Since you seem ever so eager to add your articles created to your contribution list, I have provided you a reference: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9905EFDC1038F930A25752C1A9679C8B63 You can also see my other articles on the topic: Volker Handloik and Johanne Sutton for my format, though you can do it with your own format. All the same, happy editing! Editorofthewiki (talk) 22:27, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

Capitalization
Hi Chandlerjoeyross. Just wondering, why do you always capitalize many unimportant words, mostly Born. I've noticed this a lot from you recently and I was just giving you a heads up. Toodles! Editorofthewiki 23:46, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:59, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Dick Knowles
Hi! The obit linked to clearly refers to "Sir Richard Knowles", not "Sir Dick", which would be pretty ludicrous when you think about it. Arisepoet (talk) 00:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Mickey Renaud
Another editor has added the  template to the article Mickey Renaud, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Mickey Renaud
An editor has nominated Mickey Renaud, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:00, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

North Yemen at the Olympics
Another editor has added the  template to the article North Yemen at the Olympics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Serbia and Montenegro at the Olympics
Another editor has added the  template to the article Serbia and Montenegro at the Olympics, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 02:00, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Mickey Renaud
It looks like it is going to be deleted. So god damn annoying. It makes no sense, he was definately notable. Wikipedia has an article on a bridge in Cambodia and that is more notable than this? Ridiculous. All these people on wiki who are so uptight. It really piss me off. Hopefully the article does not get deleted. michfan2123 (talk) 02:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Tegs, Ziggy, Jay EEanders.Jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Tegs, Ziggy, Jay EEanders.Jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 08:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

ASG
Hi,

The all star game is an exhibition game. Sure, it has some of the league's biggest stars, but ultimately the game counts for nothing. Most of the players (admittedly) do not even give close to 100%. Kobe Bryant (one of the best players in the game) played all of three minutes. There are much more important things than an exhibition game. This is a place for contemporary geopolitical news relevant to the international community. This is not a sports bias on my part- i frequently add sports news, but not exhibition games. Please also note I am not the only user to remove this entry. There is a time and a place for everything. Current events is not the place for this. See you when Finals comes around. WikiTony (talk) 22:14, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

WrestleMania XXIV
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox.  TJ   Spyke   22:41, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That was the friendliest warning I could find. "TBA" is wrong and inccurate. The participants will not be announced, they will be determined (hence "TBD"), not to mention that "To be annoucned" redirects to "To be determined" (so there was no reason to change the link). You may think TBA looks better, but TBD is more accurate and waht we at WP:PW use in situations like this.  TJ   Spyke   22:47, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Noggra
I have nominated Noggra, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Noggra. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ÐeadΣyeДrrow (Talk | Contribs) 00:45, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px]] Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Tikiwont (talk) 12:40, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Matt Golik
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Matt Golik, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Matt Golik. -- Y not be working? 20:29, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Matt Golik
An editor has nominated Matt Golik, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 00:01, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Beto Carrero
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Beto Carrero, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Beto Carrero. Ozgod (talk) 14:53, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Editor review
It seems that you have been having a rough time aroung here recently, and I'm sorry this has been happening. Anyway, I'm going to offer that you review my edits at Editor review/Editorofthewiki. Happy editing, Chandlerjoeyross! Editorofthewiki 21:22, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for starting the Andrew Britton article. I was planning to do so, as my time allowed. Thanks. Shame he died so young. (Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 00:02, 23 March 2008 (UTC))

Image copyright problem with Image:Treyjohnson.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Treyjohnson.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Ricky81682 (talk) 06:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)

Wow
The article on Sherri Wood is very nice. I didn't hear that she had passed. Great job! ~ Dark  Zorro  13:13, 29 March 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Deaths in 2008
An editor has nominated Deaths in 2008, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of McKelvey
A tag has been placed on McKelvey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr. P. S. Phillips (talk) 03:27, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Many thanks for the award, my friend. I am flattered by the compliment. Regards, WWGB (talk) 11:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Full.822128abdul.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Full.822128abdul.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 15:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 15:38, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:WuJin.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:WuJin.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 12:20, 4 May 2008 (UTC)