User talk:Changomo

As indicated 4 days ago, I will replace the non-standard picture of the black t cab with 355 wheels with a picture of the stock car. Buzzm (talk) 22:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Changomo: You've been busy on the Ferrari Mondial page! It is protocol not to post pix of cars with aftermarket components, esp. wheels. The black t cab is sporting 355 wheels, not OEM wheels. I will set up the Mondial t section with a stock cabriolet in the infobox section and a coupe in the left/text section. More t cabs were made than coupes so that follows the production numbers. Giving you the heads up. Also: Jury is out on the purpose of the relative comparison charts. This is clearly a Mondial-beats-all list. And I own one so it's not like I dispute the numbers -- it's the intention of the publication. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Buzzm (talk • contribs) 02:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

(edited wrong page - reverted to previous version)

Wherify Wireless}}}
Hello, Changomo, and welcome to Wikipedia. An article you recently created,, has been tagged for speedy deletion because its content is clearly written to promote a company, product, or service. This article may have been deleted by the time you see this message. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not an advertising service. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 07:51, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure the article was tagged because its promotional, it was tagged because it's too short to be a proper article. It needs to be expanded. Herostratus 05:14, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Dm2005.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Dm2005.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:44, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Bloodwire
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Bloodwire, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.bloodwire.com/about_main.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:56, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of One Kings Lane


A tag has been placed on One Kings Lane, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia for multiple reasons. Please see the page to see the reasons. If the page has since been deleted, you can ask me the reasons by leaving a message on my user talk page.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Amartyabag  TALK2ME  06:24, 18 February 2012 (UTC)

Depeche Mode at List of best-selling music artists
Depeche Mode's U.S. certified sales are correct, 10.5 million certified albums, 1.5 million certified singles, 400,000 units videos. See my detailed file for Depeche Mode here. You must be double counting some of the awards, you only need to count the highest award once. Your images here and here do not prove anything different as those are all included in the total for USA.--Harout72 (talk) 00:59, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

My apologies, you are correct -read the Talk Page, you know what you're doing. Thanks.--Changomo (talk)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ferrari Mondial, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrari 308. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Helix LLC


A tag has been placed on Helix LLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  Vanjagenije  (talk)  20:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Helix llc


The article Helix llc has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "looks like advertising"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Weatherextremes (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

Mondal stats
I do not think that the huge comparative section is really in line with policy, WP:NOTSTATSBOOK and WP:NOTCATALOGUE. If you would like to make a point about Its reception what you want is someone (preferably writing for a respected media outlet) summarizing the reception, then put that guys conclusion in the article. I think the large and assuredly lovingly crafted comparison table would fit better on a Mondial specific site. Toasted Meter (talk) 17:10, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I have taken the liberty of removing most of the bloat from the article. X-750 List of articles I have screwed over 23:43, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Boulderdash, the no statsbook gave for examples #3 being the one most applicable:


 * 1) Summary-only descriptions of works. Wikipedia treats creative works (including, for example, works of art or fiction, video games, documentaries, research books or papers, and religious texts) in an encyclopedic manner, discussing the development, design, reception, significance, and influence of works in addition to concise summaries of those works. For more information regarding summaries, see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Writing about fiction § Contextual presentation.
 * 2) Lyrics databases. An article about a song should provide information about authorship, date of publication, social impact, and so on. Quotations from a song should be kept to a reasonable length relative to the rest of the article, and used to facilitate discussion, or to illustrate the style; the full text can be put on Wikisource and linked to from the article. Most song lyrics published after 1922 are protected by copyright; any quotation of them must be kept to a minimum, and used for direct commentary or to illustrate some aspect of style. Never link to the lyrics of copyrighted songs unless the linked-to site clearly has the right to distribute the work. See Do not include the full text of lengthy primary sources for full discussion.
 * 3) Excessive listings of unexplained statistics. Statistics that lack context or explanation can reduce readability and may be confusing; accordingly, statistics should be placed in tables to enhance readability, and articles with statistics should include explanatory text providing context. Where statistics are so lengthy as to impede the readability of the article, the statistics can be split into a separate article and summarized in the main article. (e.g., statistics from the main article United States presidential election, 2012 have been moved to a related article Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2012). Notability offers more guidance on what kind of lists are acceptable, and Stand-alone lists offers guidance on what entries should be included.
 * 4) Exhaustive logs of software updates.

The statistics said - do not include stats that lack context, outside a table, and with no source. -Is the tables you keep on trying to censor have no context, outside a table, or have no documentation? Every car article in every mainstream magazine has a competitor section to give CONTEXT to the vehicles performance

The second 'violation' you refer to is
 * 1) Lists or repositories of loosely associated topics such as (but not limited to) quotations, aphorisms, or persons (real or fictional). If you want to enter lists of quotations, put them into our sister project Wikiquote. Of course, there is nothing wrong with having lists if their entries are relevant because they are associated with or significantly contribute to the list topic. Wikipedia also includes reference tables and tabular information for quick reference. Merged groups of small articlesbased on a core topic are permitted. (See Wikipedia:Stand-alone lists § Appropriate topics for lists for clarification.)
 * 2) Genealogical entries. Family histories should be presented only where appropriate to support the reader's understanding of a notable topic.
 * 3) The White or Yellow Pages. Contact information such as phone numbers, fax numbers and e-mail addresses is not encyclopedic. Likewise, disambiguation pages (such as John Smith) are not intended to be complete listings of every person in the world named John Smith—just the notable ones.
 * 4) Directories, directory entries, electronic program guide, or a resource for conducting business. For example, an article on a broadcaster should not list upcoming events, current promotions, current schedules, format clocks, etc., although mention of major events, promotions or historically significant program lists and schedules may be acceptable. Likewise an article on a business should not contain a list of all the company's patent filings. Furthermore, the Talk pages associated with an article are for talking about the article, not for conducting the business of the topic of the article.
 * 5) Sales catalogues. An article should not include product pricing or availability information unless there is an independent source and a justified reason for the mention. Encyclopedic significance may be indicated if mainstream media sources (not just product reviews) provide commentary on these details instead of just passing mention. Prices and product availability can vary widely from place to place and over time. Wikipedia is not a price comparison service to compare the prices of competing products, or the prices and availability of a single product from different vendors or retailers.
 * 6) Non-encyclopedic cross-categorizations, such as "people from ethnic / cultural / religious group X employed by organization Y" or "restaurants specializing in food type X in city Y". Cross-categories like these are not considered sufficient basis to create an article, unless the intersection of those categories is in some way a culturally significant phenomenon. See also Overcategorization for this issue in categories.
 * 7) Simple listings without context information. Examples include, but are not limited to: listings of business alliances, clients, competitors, employees (except CEOs, supervisory directors and similar top functionaries), equipment, estates, offices, products and services, sponsors, subdivisions and tourist attractions. Information about relevant single entries with encyclopedic information should be added as sourced prose. Lists of creative works in a wider context are permitted.

None of these example apply to a competitor tables.

Please do not censor data - was there a datapoint in there that was wrong, misleading? I am assuming at this point there was a car near and dear to your heart that you seem intent on HIDING information?

Disambiguation link notification for June 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ferrari F136 engine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Spin-off ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ferrari_F136_engine check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ferrari_F136_engine?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:39, 29 June 2019 (UTC)

Ferrari 456
Pushing Your agenda against facts. Porsche 959 is a production and street legal car. More than 300 were made. Just because it was not welcome in US due to emissions regulations does not make it non-production prototype. Homologation specials are considered production cars. "Worldwide-availability" is not a factor. Also US-availability is not a synonim to Worldwide-availability. Maserati 3200 GT, for example, was not available in US, was it also an illegal prototype? Records held by cars are not bound by the markets they were intended for. Your edits are increasingly disruptive. YBSOne (talk) 08:55, 2 July 2019 (UTC)