User talk:ChaosMaster16/Archive3

Ghost Whisperer
Please stop editing the Ghost Whisperer page. These are the CORRECT Ratings, the ratings you are posting are just preliminary. 4.07 "Treshold" is the highest rated episode of Season 4 not 4.16 "Ghost Busted" CBS has released a Press Release saying "Treshold" is the highest rated of Season 4. AND Season 3 averaged 9.3 not 8.7. So please stop messing up the Ghost Whisperer page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.244.187.134 (talk) 02:03, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Two small notes
Hello. Just two small notes:
 * Please be particularly careful when editing templates. It isn't that they're crazy-special or anything, but a misplaced tag in a template can make it harder to find in the actual article (in this case, I'm talking about Template:Ghost Whisperer, which accidentally added gibberish to the end of the actual article). No accusations of having been sloppy or anything, I'm just suggesting double (or triple) checking for templates because it can be much harder to find problems.
 * I've noticed that you tend to first create articles in your own userspace before putting them into the normal article space. Obviously, not a problem. However, when doing so, you can not use 'fair use' images in your works-in-progress. Basically, 'fair use' only covers being included in articles, not userspace or talk pages. Can't really blame you, mind you. People have removed them in the past, but has anyone actually told you that they did it? (kinda hard to expect someone to stop doing something if they don't know it's wrong, eh?) 209.90.133.69 (talk) 22:56, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Ghost Whisperer
Listen I am not trying to be mean or anything but I took care of that page until you came along and fucked it up. Season 4 averaged 10.32 million not 10.27 million. I did the math did you? and according to spoilerjunkie.wordpress.com which is a reliable site has said Season 3 averaged 9.3 million. You need to do the math.......

Orphaned non-free media (File:Newmoon.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:Newmoon.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Smallville
Thanks for getting those sources. I did some partial reverts. I took out the "2009/2010" from the Nielsen Rating section, because the show hasn't aired yet, let alone in 2010. It's ok to use in the "Broadcasting" section because it's being used to identify the specific television Fall season, and not directly about Smallville. I also put back the Wednesday at 8pm stuff, because that was in relation to how The WB kept moving the timeslot around.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  19:59, 21 May 2009 (UTC)


 * As far as I know there is no "official" info at this time, other than there will be a season 9. That Mason stuff is really only on Kryptonsite (as far as I can tell), plus it isn't enough to warrant a whole new page. We really don't need to start worry about a page until they start telling us about where season 9 will going, and start giving us titles and airdates. Otherwise, the LOE page will be just fine until we have something of substance to put on a new page. Speaking of, I just created Justice League (Smallville).   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:18, 11 June 2009 (UTC)

Ratings of Ghost Whisperer
First, season 3 averaged 9.30 million viewers. I wrote the rating of every single episode. Second, s04e06 had 11.06 million viewers, not 10.09. I'm sure other ratings were changed and they are NOT correct. P.S. And the season average is 10.2830435 which is 10.28, not 10.62 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Waterflame96 (talk • contribs) 16:18, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Brenda hampton.jpg
Hi, ChaosMaster! First, I want to say thanks for all the work you've put into the Secret Life pages. I'm hoping, with a little work, that the main page will achieve good article status soon, so I've been working on it. That's when I realized that the Brenda Hampton pic wouldn't fit fair-use, because Brenda's still alive. Because neither you or I are admin (right?), I tagged the pic so that an admin will hopefully delete it soon. Thanks again for all your work! Liquidluck (talk) 18:07, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Here's the official notification:

Thanks for uploading Image:Brenda hampton.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the media description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

File:Large 0423-twilight-new-moon.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Large 0423-twilight-new-moon.jpg, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Ejfetters (talk) 12:07, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

ECLIPSE
I work at the Casting office in Vancouver. Tyler Posey will be playing Seth Clearwater and Sydney Lila Spencer an unknown will be Leah clearwater. Summit will be releasing this in a press release on July 19th, 2009. I will give you a heads up on the rest of new cast as they are finalized. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Twilight01010 (talk • contribs) 19:31, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't know why you deleted my contribution to the page of Secret Life of the American Teenager Season2, because it is accurate. Please don't delete again, I worked hard to site it and right a good episode guide. If you think my contribution is not correct look and watch my sited sources, they are correct and you will feel ashamed for deleting it the first time. There's room for two editors of the Secret Life page, and I would love to become a part of it, if you'll let me. I'm a huge fan of the show and want to provide viewers with what's going on during the series. If that's too big of a problem for you, don't edit the Secret Life page anymore. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sna122 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Moving
Hi, Chaos. I undid the redirect at List of characters in the Secret Life of the American Teenager because the move was not done according to the procedure listed at WP:MOVE, and has to be in order for Wikipedia to avoid copyright issues. Because the new page is already made, the move needs to be requested at WP:RM for admin help. You can list it there, or if you want I can do it in a little bit. Let me know at my talk page if you'd like me to do it. Thanks for all your work, Liquidluck (talk) 01:17, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, if you can tell me why the name is being changed; I thought that there was a discussion at the old talk (I haven't been very involved recently), but I checked and there wasn't. If there was never a discussion, I think we should conduct one to check for consensus first- we can always redirect the other page, since there hasn't been too much work on it and it's all been done by you. If there was a discussion and I'm just being blind, then just let me know! Thanks, Liquidluck (talk) 01:29, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmmm, I see your point. Okay, lets do this- if you are still the only major contributor, you can mark it for speedy deletion, with . Then, after it is deleted, we can just move it. I don't know why I didn't think of this earlier, it so much simpler! Best, Liquidluck (talk) 18:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Hi ChaosMaster16. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete List of characters in The Secret Life of the American Teenager, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion G7 because of the following concern: you requested deletion under this criterion after other users made substantial contributions to the article. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards POKERdance talk/ contribs 21:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Secret Life
Hi Chaos! Thanks for getting Characters of... deleted. I moved the List of Characters to there, as you asked :]. Cheers! Liquidluck (talk) 18:18, 7 August 2009 (UTC)

TV.Com and Smallville
You shouldn't be using TV.com. It's fan submitted information. I have found countless things on their that were sourced directly to Kryptonsite.com. The only time I'd suggest using TV.com is maybe for professional reviews, and even I'd limit the usage. The fact remains that the CW has not officially released any titles yet. I've searched online for episode titles, the ones that Kryptonsite lists, and no reliable source has actually mentioned any of them as of this moment. So, there isn't a reason to separate a page that would basically just be duplicating information that's on the LOE page. Once we actually have some episode titles, and we can leave a table on the LOE page then we can look to separating season 9 out. We still have over a month before season 9 even starts, and you know the CW doesn't release official titles/descriptions for episodes until a few weeks before they air.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  23:28, 21 August 2009 (UTC)


 * I check MSN and TV Guide multiple times a day. You know we don't work on the "it's only a matter of time" schedule. :D When it's done it's done. I'm sure it won't be that much longer. It isn't like we have so much to report that we need a separate page anyway.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  02:22, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

fav food
what is your favorite food —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loverofjonas (talk • contribs) 22:46, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

The CW
I haven't heard anything of the sort. It's probably just speculation. To be honest, it's a basic cable network and the people that own it need to stop trying to compare it to CBS, NBC, ABC and FOX. Those are major broadcasting stations, and you cannot compete with them. If Heroes, Lost, House, or CSI were on the The CW they'd be in the same predicament. It's just a low end channel. As for it being shut down. That's CBS's call. They could shut the division down tomorrow if they want to. The only reason low ratings for the network would shut it down would be if there was no profit in running the network. Everything is based on advertisement. If it's still profitable to run the network then they'll do it.

As for Smallville, I haven't heard it being extended past a potential tenth season anyway. If we get 10, i highly doubt we'll get eleven. Nine years was unheard of, and ten years will be a blessing and probably the end - if it's not this year. Personally, I think that if they moved Smallville back to Wednesday night they'd have better ratings. Frankly, I think the real reason that Dawn moved Smallville to Fridays is not that she wanted to kill the show, I think she knew that any new show was going to fail in that timeslot and it was a better business venture to take your top rated show and see if you can move it into the slot and stir up better business. In theory, that worked. Smallville did better than what we had last year in the same timeslot. I think people are still getting used to the idea of it being on on Fridays, and hopefully the ratings will rise. I think that if we can at least get to 3 million a week, the show will be fine.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  01:43, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


 * I think a Kyle XY type of show (or the actual show if you can buy it from ABC Family) would be great. Right now there is nothing to look forward to after Smallville. It needs a companion show, otherwise there isn't a reason to tune in for just 1 hour on Fridays. The ratings plummet I foresaw, because it's Friday. I didn't expect a 2.5 mill premiere, but again it's Friday. Hopefully it goes up, because if it works like all the other seasons, then 2.5 mill won't be the lowest we see.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  03:30, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

FlashForward Summaries
The FlashForward summaries I reverted and you persist in adding back were PLAGIARIZED from TItanTV.com, the site that provides episode summaries to TVGuide and the various electronic cable guides, and entered without a source, a second act of plagiarism by any editor doing so. TV.com and other sites lift them and slightly reword. I'm going to revert them again, because they are WP:COPY violations. Please do not restore them, but instead, take the time to write a summary that actually reflects what happened in the episode. Drmargi (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Smallville
Obviously, when the only 2 editors of a page disagree there doesn't tend to be a lot of consensus. :/ I put in a request for additional, neutral opinions at the project page so we can resolve this. I don't want this to get anymore heated than it already has, as I'm sure frustration abounds on both sides. Cheers.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  00:39, 22 October 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I agree that more opinions should be "added" into the situation. It's nothing against you, I just think it looks messy and unorganized. ChaosMaster16 (talk) 00:43, 22 October 2009 (UTC)ChaosMaster16

AfD nomination of FlashForward (season 1)
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is FlashForward (season 1). We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/FlashForward (season 1). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:41, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

BuddyTV
We should have been using the Ausiello report on Bacic.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  01:40, 13 November 2009 (UTC)

Edits
Hi there, would you mind doing multiple edits as one edit? It floods my watchlist, falsifies your edit count and makes the history more difficult to navigate through. Thanks! ~ ς ح   д r   خ є  ~ 01:19, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
 * When you uploaded Twilight-dvd.jpg, you uploaded it with no license and with Non-free use rationale, and when you added the license later, you added a license for posters, which this is obviously not, but instead, a DVD cover. When you upload DVD covers, use the license Non-free video cover. The proper templates are preloaded for your convenience at Upload. ~ ς ح   д r   خ є  ~ 21:16, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Box office table
Why did you undo my edit? That is for Box Office PERFORMANCE, not for director and runtime. You can make a new table for that. I've reverted your edit as it's not logical to clutter the table up with that. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 03:28, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

Re; New Moon
Box Office Mojo under Charts and yes it's linked under the "Reference" box. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 00:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The "Crew" table? -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 00:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well like I said it's already in the infobox and I made it to show you what one looks like -- but no one seems to be reverting it then oh well. If someone does, then you'll have to deal with them on their talk page. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 01:24, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

"That is not a reliable source. Also, it's ten months old", "Lol, not a reliable source?!! You're hillarious! EOnline is defently a reliable source. And So what if it's ten months old? That doesn't mean we don't use it." What I meant was ... it's ten months old, production could have shifted since then. You can't assume something they wanted to do almost a year ago will still remain. ~ ς ح   д r   خ є  ~ 20:51, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * ChaosMaster, I think you need to chill out. We WERE going by guidelines, as we were discussing this to try and reach consensus (which is already done). That was not the place for you to attack and try to push your own agenda when someone disagrees with how you feel. Please be civil the next time you discus something like that. -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 3:42 pm, Today (UTC−6)


 * Do not violate guidelines to get your way. First, it's only been 5 days (not 7 days) since the move request was made. Second, the current consensus is to move (5-2 in favor). As for the merits of your argument, I have already countered those on the talkpage with proof that shows the official name is "The Twilight Saga: New Moon".  TJ   Spyke   22:55, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

December 2009
Hello. It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on others' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Mike Allen talk · contribs 01:36, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Just because you believe your actions to be justified doesn't mean you can break policy. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 22:52, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Eclipse (2010 film). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ''Enough with pushing your obviously solo point of view. '' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:21, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Talkback: SpikeToronto
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at New Moon (2009 film) & Eclipse (2010 film). During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. NJA (t/ c)  07:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)