User talk:ChaosMaster16/Archive4

About BOM and The-Numbers
Last night when I updated The Twilight Saga: New Moon box office gross, The-Numbers (which is considered a reliable source from the Film Project) had the best figure. When I update film grosses, I always check BOM or T-N to see which one has the best figures. Now when you add or update something like that, it's best to provide a cite next to it and provide an edit summary a little less condescending or bitter. You could have said "updated gross via BOM" and all you had to do was provide this next to the figure in the infobox. Usually when you change a big figure like that without citing a reference it will get reverted, esp when the reverter doesn't double check the reference (and they really shouldn't have to, that's your job if you're updating it). I hope you this has helped you somehow. :-) -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 18:44, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. TheRealFennShysa (talk) 23:01, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on The Twilight Saga (film series). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. ''Enough with the edit warring and attempts to continue pushing your POV. You are not helping the articles with this continued stubborn refusal to accept consensus and stop trying to twist things to get your own preferences in the article. I'd urge you to just step away from all of these articles for awhile until you can act in a more neutral and cooperative fashion. If you continue like this, you will only end up getting blocked again and for a longer time.'' -- Collectonian  (talk · contribs) 23:05, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

About your recent edits on Twlight
ChaosMaster of course it's also known as "New Moon", it is part of the title. It's not like it's known as some other unique and different title. You see what I mean? So it's redundant to say that. It's starting to appear you are just here trying to run the ChaosMaster-pedia and not Wikipedia, which has guidelines that needs to be followed. You understand that edit wars severely disrupts that article, the one you like so much? If I may ask, does the '16' in your name indicate your age? -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 06:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)


 * I understand, and I think Im going to take a vacation from the Twilight aricles for a while, help somewhere else. And, lol, of course my age isn't 16, I am about 6 years older than that.ChaosMaster16 (talk) 11:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * So you must be a teacher at Hazlet Township Public Schools? I mean seriously you didn't have to lie to me, if you would have told the truth, I probably would have more sympathy for you.  I was 16 on the internet at one time too.  Going by your IP that you use to edit with, from school, it seems you're not here for the right reasons anyway.  -- Mike Allen talk · contribs 19:20, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war&#32;at The Twilight Saga: Eclipse. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. NJA (t/ c)  07:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Admin note: Second edit warring block this week. NJA (t/ c)  12:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Your interpretation of the rules governing the relevant policy are incorrect. Further, there's really no reason to be 'pushing your luck' on Wikipedia. It's meant to be a collaborative project to build an encyclopaedia, not a battle ground. Please be more careful in future as the blocks to prevent disruption will only get longer in duration. NJA (t/ c)  12:31, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Secretlifepromo.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Secretlifepromo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 02:50, 14 December 2009 (UTC)