User talk:Chappy84/Archive 2

Leeds United A.F.C. Chairmen
Hi, sorry for not responding earlier, I am useless at these kind of things! Erm... well I have done some major editing on it, probably since you last saw it, including a full list of directors since 1997ish... if you know anymore, it would be great if you could put them on their. The page I have edited is now a lot more comprehensive than the LUFC Chairmen category list. --T1v37r 21:02, 19 November 2006 (UTC)

Opinion Needed
You have responded to a move debate. There is a related debate where your opinion would be useful at header tags. TonyTheTiger 19:10, 25 November 2006 (UTC)

triva
Speak to Qwghlm about it. He asked me to get rid of it. Bole2 20:16, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Has Qwghlm confirmed this with you? You are correct about the snong title. But would it not be better to Wikify it than to stick a main article link in the middle of a section. And as said before a triva section seems very uncyclopedia. If you'd like to keep the fact in the aricle you could sick them into an existing section. Bole2 20:41, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Trivia sections should be avoided - see what I had to say in Peer review/Leeds United A.F.C./archive1 and (more importantly) the Avoid trivia sections in articles (which forms part of the Manual of Style). Also note all current good and featured football club articles don't have Trivia sections. If something is important enough to mention in an article you should be able to fit it into the text proper, else get rid of it. Qwghlm 21:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Mediation Case
I have oppened a mediation case regarding the dispute between you and Coopuk. I would like you to answer the question at User:Natl1/Mediation Case: 2006-12-17 Leeds United A.F.C.--Natl1 22:38, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

image
I uploaded Image:The Magic Numbers.jpg on Commons, but it seems that they have a problem with it --Ar-ras 04:43, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Roll muhammadali6.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Roll muhammadali6.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:04, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Roll livemelkweg1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Roll livemelkweg1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:39, 28 January 2007 (UTC)

Top Gear Survey
Just to let you know I have reverted your addition of the 2007 results. This is because the results announced in Feb 2007 were actually the results of the 2006 survey. DrFrench 11:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Charity Shield.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Charity Shield.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self-no-disclaimers tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ed g2s &bull; talk 11:33, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Images with unsuitable Creative Commons licences
Hi, I've deleted a couple of the images you've uploaded from Flickr as they have licences which aren't suitable for our needs - we can only use Creative Commons licences which permit Commercial Use and Derivative Works - both images prevented commercial use. If you're the author, please accept my apologies and re-upload the material under a suitable licence, and if your using Flickr Advanced Search, make sure you have all the Creative Commons licence boxes selected - this will limit your search to images that are totally suitable for Wikipedia. If you find these images, please also consider uploading them to Wikimedia Commons. Best Wishes -- Nick  t  17:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)

Removal of player categories
Hey there. Regarding your extraction of player categories if they didn't make a first-team appearance for Leeds (which makes sense): did you remove the category even if the player made an appearance for the the club in a competition other than the league? I ask because I was about to remove the Lincoln City F.C. players category from Matt Dickins' article, but then I saw in his Soccerbase profile that he made one "other" appearance for them. What would you do in this case? - Dudesleeper · Talk 01:36, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, I didn't see Dickins' first stint at Lincoln at the time of my above comment. Thanks for bringing that to my attention. - Dudesleeper · Talk 13:47, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
 * It seems there was actually a consensus against this. - Dudesleeper · Talk 04:22, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:Bremner And Revie.jpg
Hi there - did you really create this image? You have tagged it GFDL-self but to me it looks like it's been scanned in from a book or newspaper. Unless you took this photograph yourself (which I doubt as your userpage says it was taken 11 years before you were born) or can prove you hold exclusive rights to the image, then it has been mistagged and should be removed as a copyright violation. Qwghlm 13:55, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * And the same applies to Image:Charity Shield n Macca.jpg as well. Qwghlm 13:59, 2 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I'm afraid Wikipedia takes an affirmative policy against copyright infringement. That means, we can't just stick pictures up, hope for the best and only take them down if someone complains, like the guy who runs mightyleeds.co.uk. All additions to Wikipedia have to comply with copyright from the outset, regardless of whether anyone complains or not. That means we have to know who holds the copyright and how they have licensed it from the very start. This means we cannot just assign Creative Commons or GFDL tags to pictures we like. That right solely lies with the copyright holder and their licensees - in the Bremner/Revie case whoever took it and/or published in the books, newspapers etc. that they originally appeared in.
 * I will tag the McAllister picture as a copyvio (as we know the URL), and nominate the Revie image for deletion (as we don't) and they will be removed in due course. Please read the copyright policy and image use policy and make sure you understand both before uploading images you have found on the web in future. Thanks. Qwghlm 16:23, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Rotherham kit image
Yep, it's a copyvio, now duly listed at WP:CP and replaced with the Football kit box. Thanks for the heads-up, but next time remember you can be bold and do it yourself. Cheers. Qwghlm 21:32, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Faithless_-_God_Is_A_DJ.ogg
Thanks for uploading Image:Faithless_-_God_Is_A_DJ.ogg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:58, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Faithless_-_I_Want_More.ogg
I have tagged Image:Faithless_-_I_Want_More.ogg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:Faithless_Insomnia.ogg
I have tagged Image:Faithless_Insomnia.ogg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 12:59, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Faithless Sample Sounds
Image:Faithless - I Want More.ogg

Image:Faithless Insomnia.ogg

Image:Faithless - God Is A DJ.ogg

All three of these are intended as samples to give examples of Faithless' work in the same way as Image:Muse - Black Holes and Revelations - Knights of Cydonia - sample.ogg is a sample to give an example of Muse's work. Do I simply put this as the rationale? None of the files I uploaded are the full song and are simply 1 minute long extracts from the song as obviously I felt uploading the full track would be rife for copyright infringement. Thanks Chappy84 13:08, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * You need to indicate in depth why the samples should be considered fair use, as opposed to re-hashing the boiler plate. As you state 'The use of the samples are to illustrate the nature of the artist/bands work in the linked articles'. It is also a general guide that over 30 secs (or 10%) is pushing the limits of fair use .ShakespeareFan00 13:11, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Image:Faithless - God Is A DJ.ogg would this be ok? if so I'll do similar with the other two. Chappy84 13:41, 12 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Perfectly fine from the perspective here ... Suggest you do the same for other stuff you uploaded.ShakespeareFan00 13:49, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Leeds United
Hi, Please see that article's talk page. Thanks, bigpad 11:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:A Final Hit.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A Final Hit.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 05:15, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I thought I'd give a shot at explaining this in reply to you comment at Betacommand's talk page. A blanket "fair use" license tag is never enough, you always need a specific fair use rationale like the one you've just added, for every single page that makes use of the image. Any other albums like this that are missing a fair use rationale are also candidates for deletion, actually. Many people upload images but are too lazy to write fair use rationales, waiting until someone comes along and tags the image for deletion, so there are very many uploaded images in violation of policy. It just means that nobody has gotten around to tagging them yet, and is not a good indicator for what to do in general. -- Darkbane  talk 14:16, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Adam Freeland - Back To Mine.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Adam Freeland - Back To Mine.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:13, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Audio Bullys - Back To Mine.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Audio Bullys - Back To Mine.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:11, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Carl Cox - Back To Mine.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Carl Cox - Back To Mine.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:09, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Faithless We Come 1.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Faithless We Come 1.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 08:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Leftfield-Leftism (album cover).jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Leftfield-Leftism (album cover).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Someone To Drive You Home.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Someone To Drive You Home.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:59, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Album review rating stars
Hey there. I see you've changed some album review ratings to use stars. Please see WP:ALBUM, which says not to use stars for reviews which don't use them. Have a nice day. --PEJL 17:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Baarskaagaard
Could you explain why their edits are vandalism? Certainly the one to The Don (song) does not appear to be vandalism although not actually needed either. Looks like a new editor needing advice unless I am missing something? Citizensmith 19:50, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok I see your reasoning if the edits to Calvin Harris articles are really hoaxes. Still seems to be a strange way to vandalise but you get all sorts... Citizensmith 20:05, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Report vandals
If the most recent warning on a user's talk page is a last warning, please report the user at WP:AIV. Thank you. Angus Lepper(T, C, D) 17:36, 19 June 2007 (UTC)