User talk:Char 9fjsos

December 2014
Hello, I'm Czar. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Heroin chic because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. czar ⨹   17:19, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm removing the edit again because it still appears promotional (we don't link to media that's tangentially related to the topic). If this documentary is super-important in the understanding of heroin chic that it deserves several sentences, we would need to cite a reliable, independent source. As it stands, that the film has a single interview does not mean it warrants inclusion in the article. czar ⨹   15:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Hello,thank you, I edited and added more sources. It is not promotional ,it is a recent relevant example of criticising heroin chic.
 * What makes it promotional is that it puts more attention on the film than on the article's topic. Only The Wild discusses heroin chic, and even then, it's an interview with the director and a passing mention of the article's subject. Any mention of the film shouldn't be more than a sentence, given its weight in the context of the rest of the article, but I don't think it even has enough coverage to be mentioned at all. Perhaps if more reliable, secondary sources are printed about it in the future. czar ⨹   22:27, 19 December 2014 (UTC)