User talk:Charamel

alfa testing my page. its working.

That Escalated Quickly
You are way out of line, giving me a Level 4 Vandalism block warning over edits to Socionics. Also it's completely disrespectful to include my IP address, since I'm a registered user who made my edits while logged in.

You haven't even attempted to engage in any dialog over this, which should have been your next step, and you are in clear violation of WP:AGF. You can't even call what I did vandalism at all. I did not damage the article in any way, and in fact I corrected a series of factual errors in the conversion table. The content you tried to cite as justification for keeping it your way in this diff doesn't even specifically address the topic we're disagreeing about. Do you think you own the Socionics article? You don't, see WP:OWN. The four things I fixed were so obviously in error that I don't need to cite anything, it's WP:BLUE for anyone who is reasonably familiar with MBTI or Socionics.

The LSI/Inspector/Pragmatist is not the MBTI ISTP, there is just no way. Not happening. The same goes for ESI/Guardian as MBTI ISTP, as well as SLI/Crafter/Mechanic as ISTJ, and the SEI/Mediator/Peacemaker as ISFJ. These are just wrong, and the way I changed it made it right. Anyone familiar with this topic should not disagree with this. This is too simple to cite sources on. Again, WP:BLUE.

I will refrain from further edits to the article for the moment while we sort this out. Now, kindly go to my talk page User talk:Darkest tree and remove your warning, or I will start the process of bringing this unwarranted behavior to an admin's attention. After you remove the warning, I'd be happy to hear your thoughts on this. Darkest Tree  Talk  04:33, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * WP:DE and WP:GAME. I will not remove warning for the sake of good. However, you can edit Socionics (and any article) with verifiable information (and not ignore WP:IRS warnings for receiving WP:VAN again). Also, you can WP:ARCHIVE talk page, if you want. --Charamel (talk) 02:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)


 * You, if anyone, are the one gaming the system. Your assertion that I am engaging in disruptive editing or vandalizing the Project is pure fantasy. I don't know what your problem is, but unless your name is Viktor Gulenko and this is the account you edit Wikipedia under, you are not the last word on Socionics and you have not shown me any information that supports your position. And instead of defending yourself with facts, you are basically engaging in threatening behavior against me without even attempting any kind of dialogue. Again, all I did was correct the conversion table, which is obviously wrong to anyone who is familiar with the subject. I do not appreciate your offensive responses to my editing. Now please explain to me why you think the MBTI ISTJ "Inspector" correlates to the Socionics SLI "Crafter/Mechanic." And the other three as well. Because these are obviously wrong. Darkest Tree   Talk  22:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)