User talk:Charan311

Welcome!
Hello, Charan311, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! 3knolls (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Hello, I'm 3knolls. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Kavin (actor) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks.--3knolls (talk) 17:14, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kavin (actor). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:18, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did with this edit to Kavin (actor). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:20, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Kavin (actor). Alex Cohn (let's chat!) 17:24, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

July 2020
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Rukmini has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:32, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Rukmini was changed by Charan311 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.921697 on 2020-07-19T17:32:13+00:00

Article Lakshmi
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Lakshmi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources. Don't remove Radha as she is widely considered as an avatar of Lakshmi. I haven't remove Rukmini. Thank you. .👨🏻‍🎨 💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 10:50, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Rukmini ji is considered as an avatar of Lakshmi mata in Vishnu Purana, I agree that. However Radha is also considered as an incarnation of goddess Lakshmi ji in other scriptures. Thats why I included "Other texts". Please corporate! Satyabhama ji is not directly an avatar of Lakshmi mata, she is avatar of Bhudevi ji, who is a form of Lakshmi. .👨🏻‍🎨 💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 12:03, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

In Vishnu Purana it's not mentioned and one more thing Devi Satyabhama is Incarnation of Bhu Devi second wife of Lord vishnu even in Vishnu Sahasranamam Devi Rukmini and Devi Satyabhama name is Mentioned. Charan311 (talk) 07:20, 23 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Stop pushing your point of view on the article Lakshmi. I have already suggested you to add these in the Lakshmi section. Also, the sources don't quote from Vishnu Purana and mention Radha also.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Regards, .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 06:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Stop changing this is from Vishnu Purana Maa Rukmini is goddess Lakshmi herself it's clearly mentioned in almost every authentic scriptures & puran Stop insulting goddess Lakshmi and Ved vyas scriptures he his god himself. Charan311 (talk) 07:57, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


 * First of all there is nothing insulting in praising Sri as a virtuous wife, supporting her husband. Second you are thinking of your POV and Wikipedia is a Encyclopaedia, so it is relies on secondary sources .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 08:09, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Ur insulting Ved vyas by insulting his scriptures Charan311 (talk) 08:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Read this 👇 Goddess Lakshmi is forever united with the Lord. With Rama, Sri becomes Sita, when He is Krishna, she is Rukmini. In all the expansions of Narayan, Sri is inseparable from Narayana.(Vishnu Purana 1.9.144)

A hero among the Kurus, the Supreme Lord himself, Govinda, married King Bhishmaka's daughter, Vaidarbhi Rukmini, who was a direct expansion of the Goddess of fortune [Sriyo maatraam]. (Bhagavata Purana 10.52.16)

Dwaraka's citizens were overjoyed to see Krishna, the Lord of all opulence, united with Rukmini, the Goddess of fortune Rama.(Srimad bhagavatam 10.54.60)

Lakshmi by Her portion took birth on earth as Rukmini in the family of Bhismaka.(Mahabharata Adi 67.156

Having Krsna as her essence, Rukmini is the basis of the material nature (mula-prakrti) and the creator of the universe. Based on the revealed knowledge (sruti) arising from the questions of the women of Vraja and also on account of her being associated with Brahman, Krsna's potency (Rukmini) is identified with pranava by the Brahmavadins. -Gopala-Tapani-Upanishad

Rukmini, the Consort of Krishna is the Swarupa-shakti (Mulaprakriti), the essential potency of Krishna (Krsnatmika) and she is the shakti / Mother of the Divine World (Jagatkatri). -Gopala-Tapani-Upanishad

The Shrutis which are closely associated with the narrations of the pastimes of the Vraja-gopis with Svayam-rupa Bhagavan Shri Krishna, the Parabrahma, have declared this truth (Gopala-tapani Upanisad 57). They cannot be separated. As Lakshmi is Vishnu's Shakti (power or strength) so even as Rukmini is Krishna's strength. Charan311 (talk) 08:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I AM TRYING TO TELL YOU TO ADD THESE QUOTINGS IN THE PURANAS SECTION NOT IN THE LEAD OF THE ARTICLE. .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 08:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Read this too👇

"When at Mathura Vishnu will ascend in four forms, Balarama, Krishna, Pradyumna, Aniruddha; I too shall manifest myself in four forms called Revati, Rukmini, Rati and Usha". (Śrī Lakśmi Tantra)

Charan311 (talk) 08:22, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Read this too 👇 "Lakşmi will be born as the daughter of Bhişmaka by name Rukmiņi. After defeating kings in a battle, I shall many her." (Skanda Purana) Charan311 (talk) 08:24, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

What's ur problem with Mother Rukmini just beacuse she Married Shri Krishna u hate her haa?? Charan311 (talk) 08:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)


 * you are definitely interested in pushing your interest rather than the Encyclopedic development of the article, please see WP:MOS .💠 245CMR 💠. •👥📜 08:26, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. . 245CMR . •👥📜 06:29, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Why are you adding Radha's name she's just foster mother of Karna from Mahabharatashe's just a normal being not Lakshmi understand that. Charan311 (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Why are you adding Radha's name she's just foster mother of Karna from Mahabharata she's just a normal being not Lakshmi understand that. Charan311 (talk) 15:54, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Edit warring at Lakshmi
Hello Charan311. You are warned not to revert again at Lakshmi unless you get a prior consensus for your change on the article talk page. This warning was the result of a complaint about your edits at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:35, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Why are you adding Radha's name she's just foster mother of Karna from Mahabharatashe's just a normal being not Lakshmi understand that. Charan311 (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

Why are you adding Radha's name she's just foster mother of Karna from Mahabharata she's just a normal being not Lakshmi understand that. Charan311 (talk) 15:52, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

There are multiple women with the name "Radha". You are talking about Karna's foster mother, kindly check the article first. Radha is the gopi and the lover of Krishna, and thus she is considered as an avatar of Lakshmi.

For references, see 'Puranic Encyclopaedia', 'Illustrated Encyclopaedia of Hinduism', 'Hinduism:An Alphabetical guide', 'Dictionary of Ancient gods', etc. . 245CMR . •👥📜 16:23, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

First u read then tell In Mahabharata, Vishnu Purana, Srimad Bhagavatm there's only one Radha mentioned that is Karna's foster Mother, Maa Rukmini is Incarnation of goddess Lakshmi herself just like how Lord Krishna is incarnation of lord Vishnu himself and Maa Satyabhama Is incarantion of Bhu Devi herself second wife of lord Vishnu. Charan311 (talk) 07:18, 6 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Again you are not willing to comply with the sources. Hinduism is not limited to these texts only. Gopi Radha is mentioned in the Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Padma Purana, Devi Bhagavata and widely worshipped along with Krishna. . 245CMR . •👥📜 09:07, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

I don't need that Tell me is she mentioned in Vishnu Purana, Mahabharata or srimad Bhagvatam if she's mentioned pls give me the verse with Sloka & meaning.& No doubt that Lord Krishna loved gopies as they all totally surrendered to Krishna,& Lord Krishna loves each and every devotee of his & the gopies was among those devotees. Charan311 (talk) 09:49, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

Non constructive editing
. Kridha (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@Charan311 : From your last edits, it is evident that you are solely interested in POV pushing. You have earlier also been warned by senior editors to stop disruptive editing but you are still showing the same traits on the pages like Devi and Lakshmi. In case of any change in content, either provide reliable sources or use talk page of the related article to resolve the dispute or difference in opinion with other editors. Kridha (talk) 11:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@Charan311: In case of any doubt or further discussion, feel free to write me on my talk page. Kridha (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Who is Rukmini according to u Charan311 (talk) 11:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

@Charan311: Personal opinions or views on any subject doesn't matter on Wikipedia. What matters is whether the content editor is adding or removing is as per the the guidelines of Wikipedia or not. Any information without a backing of reliable source will get reverted by other editors. Kridha (talk) 11:24, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Rukmini. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. . 245CMR . •👥📜 12:12, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

It's was not like this before so I had changed like before but y r u changing u hater for that radha u added fictional stories which is not true for Mother Rukminī iam adding real information so people can understand more about her y so haterd towards the divine mother. Charan311 (talk) 14:17, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rukmini, you may be blocked from editing.

'''Note: What hatred?! Wikipedia is based on reliable sources and not a place to spread your POV. Though she appeared in the Mahabharata, Rukmini as Lakshmi's avatar was added in Puranas i.e Vishnu Purana, Bhagavata Purana, etc. (Radha's associated also appeared in Brahma Vaivarta Purana, Padma Purana, etc.) . 245CMR''' . •👥📜 02:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

I didn't say ur Radha is fictional but Iam just editing how it was before about mother Rukminī someone changed it Fully but what's ur problem in that this shows ur haterd towards the divine mother goddess ok block me just beacuse I said the glories of Mother Rukminī better do one thing delete the page of Rukminī itself better say she never existed instead of Insulting her which hurts alot Charan311 (talk) 04:21, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

@Charan311: Previous version of Rukmini's page was filled with unsourced content. The latest changes are done based on available sources. Kindly, spare the time and look for some other reliable sources to support your edits. And please stop comparing Radha and Rukmini. Your previous edits show how everytime, you remove the information related to Radha on the pages like Lakshmi, Devi, Radha and Krishna. And here you are, calling other editors Hater. Irony !! Kridha (talk) 04:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Even In ur Radha's page many unsourced content are mentioned y don't u change that y only Mother Rukminī previous version was perfect there was nothing wrong in that in haterd towards Mother Rukminī u removed most important things about her. Charan311 (talk) 06:55, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

Mention the unsourced content on Radha's page. I will add the source. And what is this "Ur Radha"? Have a little decency while referring a goddess. This is the least I expect from fellow editor in any conversation. Kridha (talk) 08:27, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

User:Charan311, I don't know where do you see anything "insulting" on the article Rukmini. Also, Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia and neutral point of view should be maintained. You can't just put glories and praises, as it violates the above policies. You have been reported for not complying with Wikipedia policies, despite multiple warnings. . 245CMR . •👥📜 14:20, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. . 245CMR . •👥📜 16:05, 23 June 2021 (UTC)

So Ok this is what I get for adding correct information ok no problem 😃 Charan311 (talk) 02:52, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

What truth, you were just removing information about Radha, which were supported by reliable sources, because you don't like her and adding your own WP:OR point of view. What hate regarding Rukmini?!! Before accusing others, please see yourself—all of edits show who is hating whom. . 245CMR . •👥📜 03:22, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

😃 Charan311 (talk) 03:53, 24 June 2021 (UTC)