User talk:Charcoalgray

October 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Woodruff Park. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Woodruff_Park&action=history page history]. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Jesanj (talk) 19:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dewey Square, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to McPherson Square, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Zuccotti Park, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.


 * I've observed that you've performed this routine blanking of several articles twice now. On the first occasions you noted that each article was referring to news events, and was not encyclopedic. This is incorrect, as each event is a notable marker in the history of the article's subject. On the second round of page blanking, you referred to one section as "propaganda". If this is the case, I invite you to find sources and replace the information with proper, verifiable information. Please do not blank pages. Address this issue in the discussion page before unilaterally blanking. --Cast (talk) 19:49, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Zuccotti Park, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. I can see that you have continued to remove information from other pages, but as these were not section blankings, but instead the removal of un-cited information, I won't challenge it. Original editors should have provided initial citation. However, I would encourage you to find citation yourself, if your concern is that information on the articles lacks citation. Building these articles is preferable to reducing them, and does not aid Wikipedia in its project to improve coverage of important topics. Thank you.--Cast (talk) 03:01, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively. Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.Clovis Sangrail (talk) 01:55, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

November 2011
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Zuccotti Park, you may be blocked from editing. I've repeatedly invited you to discuss your grievances on the Zuccotti Park talk page. You've repeatedly left edit comments suggesting you think this is an non-notable news event. However, as a notable event in the park's history, Occupy Wall Street--strictly as it pertains to the park itself--deserves mention. Effort and care has been taken to limit the information to what pertains only to the park. The background of the protest, the participant demographics, the media reception of the protest, commentary by third parties, and the social impact of the protests, have all been kept off this article. There is no need to repeatedly blank the whole section. I have been attempting to assume good faith on your part, but your actions are bordering on vandalism. Please stop so that we can work together to improve the article, rather than detract from it.--Cast (talk) 02:43, 5 November 2011 (UTC)