User talk:Charles01/Archive 37

Disambiguation link notification for January 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hartwig Fischer, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Martin Roth. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 2 January 2016 (UTC)

Triumph Renown
It is my understanding that the car was all set for production beginning in 1940 but that Alvis factory was wiped out. After the war there was nothing to go back to but the design (which was prewar). When I find a good reference I'll let you know. Happy New Year. Eddaido (talk) 10:54, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Noted.  Interesting.   Thanks.   Looking at the other cars that were designed at the end of the 1930s, the look of the thing (Alvis/Triumph Renown) would have been seriously outside the mainstream in Britain (or indeed France or Germany) in 1939/40.   But then it was pretty much outside the European mainstream as a Standard-Triumph in the 1940s/50s.


 * The combination of the timber frame and the aluminium panels was presumably the thing that enabled them to produce those "razor edge" corners, and it was only after 1945, with demand for fighter planes suddenly collapsed and an oversupply of aluminium from production facilities set up when money was no object now desperately needing to justify their capital cost, that aluminium for competitively priced (well, fairly and admittedly only for a few years) passenger cars could become a reality.  Just reactive musings on my part, you understanding.   Any outcomes of your further researches on this would indeed be interesting.   And indeed, Happy Year!   Saluts Charles01 (talk) 11:12, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * The styling was the very height of bespoke fashion in the last quarter of the 1930s, Alvis was upmarket. I should think a much bigger engine was intended for it. Here's a body of the same period. Best, Eddaido (talk) 11:20, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * You don't know what a truly Socialist govt was like. They rationed steel but Aluminium was uncontrolled. In any case Aluminium was the usual metal of the bodies of better quality cars in the 1920s and 1930s remember the constant English battle with little engines for tax purposes and heavy bodies. But the alloy was not structural like in recent cars. The sharp edges of the razor-edge style was called "the panel beaters' nightmare" here. Eddaido (talk) 11:35, 4 January 2016 (UTC) Alvis sports saloon 1939 - sports saloon with only 4 windows not six-light from a different angle rolls PIII, Eddaido (talk) 11:55, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year
A Happy New Year to you Charles! I was wondering if you or could translate Electra, My Love from German?♦  Dr. Blofeld  22:49, 4 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I will if he doesn't! Best Charles01 (talk) 10:02, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Looks good, replied on my talk page about it. Some of those Balkan films are wonderfully interesting to film buffs as such as myself. The Goat Horn is another good one, that's Bulgarian. BTW there's a few red links in Elizabeth Rona which I just promoted for Susun, not sure if there's any you can do though.♦ Dr. Blofeld  20:01, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorted - as in I've done the easy (for me) bit on the Elisabeth Rona entry.  However, it could be helpful if you could go back to the Electra entry and check out a couple of "disambiguition flags" it picked up (below) on two common names - John Cunningham and Bryan Burns.   They're both names I picked up from elsewhere - probably German wikipedia - without knowing too much about the individuals involved, and when I go to people who have wikipedia entries and those names I find myself thinking "maybe:maybe not".   Someone with a longer and closer knowledge of the world of films and critics MIGHT know at once whether the men in question are likely to be those ones.   Or not.   If you're not sure, I do not myself see any harm in leaving a link pointing to a disambiguation page until someone comes along who knows - at least beyond reasonable doubt believes they know - the answer.   But no doubt you will have your own views on this!   Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 11:50, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Invitation to a virtual editathon on Women in Music

 * Noted.  I'll see where I get to (and whether any of the women currently on my "to do" list could be persuaded into a "music" category).  Success Charles01 (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Electra, My Love
 * added links pointing to John Cunningham and Bryan Burns


 * Gabriel Karg
 * added a link pointing to Derendingen


 * Herbord Sigismund Ludwig von Bar
 * added a link pointing to French empire

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 10 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Jean Weidt
 * added links pointing to Britain and Fascist Italy


 * Piter Poel
 * added a link pointing to Godfather

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Intertranswiki
Thanks Charles for continuing this. Sorry that I'm inactive at the moment and am not helping you create articles. I've made it a 3 month thing now. so you can list what you want to get done in three months and then archive it. I've also dropped the bold for start class expectation to make things easier. Thankyou again for continuing to create from within the project.♦ Dr. Blofeld  13:20, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Charles, can you check my article on Noura? You know French is the hardest language for me to translate and she is Algerian to boot so Arabic and French mix -- not my strong suits. That being said, she is definitely worthy of an article. As always, I appreciate your help and insight :) SusunW (talk) 06:52, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bâtiment des Forces motrices, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ceres and Mercury. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:52, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Elizabeth Rona
&mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 12:02, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you.  I was waiting for the coffee to cool down when I spotted this notification.   Still am.   Regards Charles01 (talk) 14:34, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

New version of Vauxhall Firenza at dockside.jpg
Hi,

I've uploaded an altered version of the above image under the new filename Vauxhall Firenza at dockside (colour and brightness correction).jpg.

I've attempted to be as faithful as possible to the original by only adjusting the overall colour balance via the colour curves, rather than "cheating" by retouching specific areas to the desired colour(!) I couldn't quite get the under-car shadows perfect that way, unfortunately.

I've also increased the brightness and contrast and applied a little highlight/shadow filter to bring out the details- again, to the entire image- but nothing specific has been retouched or altered by hand.

Please let me know if there's anything you don't like about this! Ubcule (talk) 19:35, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you.  From the date of the picture I know (at least, I think I know) it was taken with a cheap camera.   And I think the slide (Dias) must have been left out (by me!) in the open air for a long time, because there's a sort of dusty stain that you can see on much of the sky.   BUT it's still a good picture in its way - interesting moody background and slightly unusual angle of an unusual car.  And thanks to your version, I can see that the car was quite clean (though it's sad about all the rust along the sill under the door - confirms some of the unkind things we used to say about Vauxhalls back then...)


 * You have brightened the car but it still looks natural.  I like that.   If I had the skills/tools I should have done the same.   Sometimes with very white cars the image of the car gets overexposed, and you lose some of the details - the panel gaps - but there's no danger of that here.   Not enough sun.   Yes, I like it.   I have difficulty thinking of anything I don't like.  I guess the sky still needs cleaning up, but I think that's an impossible job.   I guess one might try making the sky look a bit darker/more stormy but WITHOUT losing any of the brightness/clarity of the car.   That might give a slightly greater contrast between the threatening grey of the sky and the clean whiteness of the car.    But ... again ...  I would not know where to begin with that.  I'm not too much of a GIMP-wizard, and even if I was I guess it might not be possible.


 * No further thoughts.  Thanks again.   Success Charles01 (talk) 20:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Glad you liked it; yes, I realised that it was possibly meant to be shot like that, which is why I didn't upload over the original. I didn't want to mess around with any details since it was really just a colour balance and brightness/contrast tweak of the original.


 * Bear in mind that the colour balance still isn't quite linear in the shadows, which might make it look a little yellower/rustier than it is.


 * Regarding the yellow streak in the sky, I have the same scanner model as you, and had similar issues with it (along with colour balance issues). I originally assumed it was the source negative, but it turned out not to be that when I rescanned it. I think it was some weird issue with light leak/reflection that disappeared when I covered any gaps in the holder... could not be bothered looking into it more than that. Personally, I think scanning is a pain in the neck to get right, and now I've done my own photographs, I'm pretty well sick of it. :-O


 * I've also uploaded a modified version of another image at File:Daihatsu Charade buying brandy (adjusted).jpg, though the colour balance still isn't quite right there, particularly in the highlights. Ubcule (talk) 20:19, 31 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes, I'd noticed you'd done a cleaned up version of the Daihatsu picture.  My instant reaction was that I like it less than the Firenza simply because the improvements draw attention to how dirty the car was!    But that was always an "issue" with this picture.   The adjusted version is clearer which should be good.   I think I took this one with an Olympus OM2 which was a goood camera, though probably using a zoom lense which gave slightly less clarity than the standard lens with the fixed image size.   But it was a good camera.   (I wish I knew where it had got to.)


 * Anyhow, I just looked again at them this morning, and I think your version is better.  Trying to clean the car using "tools" would certainly leave it looking unnatural which is not a good idea.   Cretan dust/mud on the bodywork gives a certain atmosphere:  presumably he'd come into town from the hills outside town, possibly to buy brandy.


 * Thanks.  Best wishes Charles01 (talk) 06:58, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I can't swear that the colour balance is 100% perfect, and I'd have been suspicious, but since you mention it, I'm inclined to concede that it probably is reddish mud. Reason being that the tarmac- at a comparable brightness level- is grey, and if it had been purely due to a reddish cast in the darker areas, that would have been affected too.


 * I've nothing against retouching photos in principle- quite the opposite!- I just like to keep a distinction between what are (meant to be) faithful corrections in colour balance, brightness and contrast and (on the other hand) explicitly retouching particular details.


 * FWIW, I've attempted to remove the dust specks (which were significantly exaggerated by the highlight-retrieval processing) but tried to avoid modifying anything that was part of the photo itself.


 * Looks like the source photo itself was probably fine, I'm guessing that the colour balance was more due to the scanner(?) The OM-2 looks to have been a better camera than the secondhand Zenit TTL I had when I was a kid anyway. :-)


 * Ubcule (talk) 19:50, 1 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you.  Definitely "better" without the specks of dust on the bonnet and a bit more of a "yellow" tint.   I've not been back to Crete since then (1982) and memory for colours is not something on which I trust myself.   But when you drive into the hills behind Xania the colour of the rocks and road surfaced where the roads are not paved / tarmac's is definitely yellowish-towards the colour of beach sand at Knokke but maybe "brighter" -  rather than ... greyish - the colour of beach sand (except where imported) on a Canary Island.   Thank you again.   Best wishes.   Charles01 (talk) 06:55, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trading of East German political prisoners, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Egon Franke. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:23, 2 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Massacre of Avranches
 * added a link pointing to Granville


 * Werner Krauss (academic)
 * added a link pointing to University of Madrid

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:49, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Great fire of Tischenreuth (1814)
I have just been reading the sad story of the great fire when I noticed the name on the picture and began to wonder if this article was anything to do with Tirschenreuth Bavaria. Maybe regional spellings vary and Maybe its not. Ever onwards and upwards, Eddaido (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Well spotted.  Best Charles01 (talk) 11:47, 21 February 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you, Gerda.  I was feeling in need of cheering up and you just did it.   I hope Sunday is treating you well.   Good things Charles01 (talk) 16:12, 21 February 2016 (UTC)


 * I hope telling you that it is two years now does the same! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Indeed it does.  Thank you.   Good things to you!  Charles01 (talk) 11:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #1—2016
Read this in another language • Subscription list for this multilingual newsletter

Did you know?

Among experienced editors, the visual editor's table editing is one of the most popular features. If you select the top of a column or the end of a row, you can quickly insert and remove columns and rows.

Now, you can also rearrange columns and rows. Click "Move before" or "Move after" to swap the column or row with its neighbor.

You can read and help translate the user guide, which has more information about how to use the visual editor.

Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor Team has fixed many bugs. Their workboard is available in Phabricator. Their current priorities are improving support for Japanese, Korean, Arabic, Indic, and Han scripts, and improving the single edit tab interface.

Recent changes
You can switch from the wikitext editor to the visual editor after you start editing. This function is available to nearly all editors at most wikis except the Wiktionaries and Wikisources.

Many local feedback pages for the visual editor have been redirected to mw:VisualEditor/Feedback.

You can now re-arrange columns and rows in tables, as well as copying a row, column or any other selection of cells and pasting it in a new location.

The formula editor has two options: you can choose "Quick edit" to see and change only the LaTeX code, or "Edit" to use the full tool. The full tool offers immediate preview and an extensive list of symbols.

Future changes
The single edit tab project will combine the "" and "" tabs into a single "" tab. This is similar to the system already used on the mobile website. (T102398) Initially, the "" tab will open whichever editing environment you used last time. Your last editing choice will be stored as an account preference for logged-in editors, and as a cookie for logged-out users. Logged-in editors will have these options in the tab of Special:Preferences: The visual editor uses the same search engine as Special:Search to find links and files. This search will get better at detecting typos and spelling mistakes soon. These improvements to search will appear in the visual editor as well.
 * , and
 * . (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.)
 * , and
 * . (This is the state for people using the visual editor now.)

The visual editor will be offered to all editors at most "Phase 6" Wikipedias during the next few months. The developers would like to know how well the visual editor works in your language. They particularly want to know whether typing in your language feels natural in the visual editor. Please post your comments and the language(s) that you tested at the feedback thread on mediawiki.org. This will affect the following languages: Japanese, Korean, Urdu, Persian, Arabic, Tamil, Marathi, Malayalam, Hindi, Bengali, Assamese, Thai, Aramaic and others.

Let's work together
If you aren't reading this in your favorite language, then please help us with translations! Subscribe to the Translators mailing list or contact us directly, so that we can notify you when the next issue is ready. Thanks!
 * Please try out the newest version of the single edit tab on test2.wikipedia.org. You may need to restore the default preferences (at the bottom of test2wiki:Special:Preferences) to see the initial prompt for options. Were you able to find a preference setting that will work for your own editing? Did you see the large preferences dialog box when you started editing an article there?
 * Can you read and type in Korean, Arabic, Japanese, Indic, or Han scripts? Language engineer David Chan needs help from people who often type in these languages. Please see the instructions at mw:VisualEditor/IME Testing if you can help. Report your results on wiki (Korean – Japanese – all languages).
 * Learn how to improve the "automagical" citoid referencing system in the visual editor, by creating Zotero translators for popular sources in your language! Join the Tech Talk about "Automated citations in Wikipedia: Citoid and the technology behind it" with Sebastian Karcher on 29 February 2016.

– Whatamidoing (WMF) 17:46, 25 February 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 2
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Julius Dickert, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reichstag. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 2 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Noted.  Thanks.   No "liberty taking" involved.   She does seem to have been quite a powerful force, though in our own more egalitarian age the "Lady bountiful I know what's best for the little people do goodery" sticks in the throat a bit - maybe more over here in "socialist" Europe than it would in the wider open (if only in some ways) parts of the USA.   Either way, a joy of history, if you can manage it, is to try and see people in the terms in which they would have been seen by contemporaries and by themselves.   That doesn't replace the wisdom of hindsight, of course.   But it needs to complement it.   So much history tells you SOOOO MUCH MORE about the times in which it is written than about the times (in theory) that it treats.   Not invalid, but there can and should be more than one dimension to the historical prism through which human history is viewed.   End of rant.   Have a good weekend.  Charles01 (talk) 07:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
 * The "do-goodery" You make me smile. I think that very prism effect is why I like writing about suffragists and activists. They were multi-faceted and you get to see all the bumps and bruises. Too many times the laurels heaped upon historical figures makes them seem unflawed heroes. I rather prefer my heroines to be "more human". In a way, the fact that they were women allowed the press license to make them real. Good wives stayed home and out of the public eye, thus even in (wink, wink, nod, nod) laudatory pieces about women activists, there is usually tarnish to the halo. As you say, it tells you a lot about the context of the times. SusunW (talk) 08:03, 5 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Marguerite de Witt-Schlumberger
Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Thank you.  Regards Charles01 (talk) 12:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Victor Emmanuel II of Italy
Hi, made a slight change to the above - is it better? Regards Denisarona (talk) 12:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes (secondo me...).  Success Charles01 (talk) 12:27, 20 March 2016 (UTC)


 * For most of us Italian Unification is the only thing we know about VE, so maybe it makes sense to launch the entry with that nice quote.  However, others might differ:  I'm left feeling a bit agnostic about it.   As an alternative, have you come across quote boxes?   To see how they work, here are some (far too many, you may think) I used on a translation I did last year.   Here's another for people who think there's too much blue in the world.


 * But no doubt there are other solutions.  Regards Charles01 (talk) 12:37, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Simone Barck, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stolpe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:20, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

WikiProject assessment tags for talk pages
Thank you for your recent articles, including Jean-Baptiste Volumier, which I read with interest. When you create a new article, can you add the WikiProject assessment templates to the talk of that article? See the talk page of the article I mentioned for an example of what I mean. Usually it is very simple, you just add something like to the article's talk, with keyword replaced by the associated WikiProject (ex. if it's a biography article, you would use WikiProject Biography; if it's a United States article, you would use WikiProject United States, and so on). You do not have to rate the article if you do not want to, others will do it eventually. Those templates are very useful, as they bring the articles to a WikiProject attention, and allow them to start tracking the articles through Article alerts and other tools. For example, WikiProject Poland relies on such templates to generate listings such as Article Alerts, Popular Pages, Quality and Importance Matrix and the Cleanup Listing. Thanks to them, WikiProject members are more easily able to defend your work from deletion, or simply help try to improve it further. Feel free to ask me any questions if you'd like more information about using those talk page templates. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Aurelio Chessa
 * added links pointing to Iglesias and Cecina


 * Gustav Heinrich Kirchenpauer
 * added a link pointing to Altona

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 28 March 2016 (UTC)