User talk:Charles01/Archive 49

January 2019
This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. – Davey 2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 15:44, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Please do not refer to any editor as a psychopath as you did here, It's one thing sarcastically calling them "Comrade" but it's another to call them the other word,
 * I understand and appreciate you're frustrated but that's no excuse for that edit summary,
 * If you make similar comments like that in future you could be blocked,
 * On a happier note I wish you and yours a very Happy and Healthy New Year,
 * Thanks, – Davey 2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 15:45, 1 January 2019 (UTC)


 * I appreciate that my judgement may well have been at fault in this.  Your chum had already told me he did not wish to be addressed or identified by his user name which would be the more usual solution.   Your own aggressive reaction is unhelpful and, from you, hypocritical.   And your "merry Christmas" flag is both inconsistent and out of date.  But I note that you feel strongly about the matter, and of course I respect your right to do so.   Happy day!  Charles01 (talk) 15:53, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I was blocked for saying calling someone a sad prick ... sure it's not exactly polite but it's nicer than being called a psychopath!,
 * I was unaware of that but if he's fine with that then great,
 * The signature is used for the festive period and I don't remove the Christmas part when Christmas ends- It all stays as is until I can be bothered to change it back but thanks for your comments,
 * Anyway have a great New Year, Cheers. – Davey 2010 Merry Christmas / Happy New Year 16:14, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Just address me as Nim, plain simple. Its not hard, its what I've been addressed as by people and I shall be addressed as that. So please, address me as Nim. Also Davey2010 is not a 'hypocrite', the block log that happened in the past can be forgotten after six months or more, its time for him to move on and do bigger stuff., please note, I do enjoy you as a friend, despite out differences -- Eurovision Nim (talk to me)(see my edits) 14:08, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for the reassuring off-wiki messages in respect of this outburst. I think it is correct that "Davey" is not an admin, but in fairness I don't think he actually wrote that he was! Regards Charles01 (talk) 18:48, 3 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Henriette Fürth, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Palestine and University of Frankfurt ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Henriette_F%C3%BCrth check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Henriette_F%C3%BCrth?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 10 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Someone else got in first.  Thank you, someone else  Charles01 (talk) 14:51, 10 January 2019 (UTC)

Apologies
Hi Charles, My apologies I was indeed meant to have readded your edit back so apologies for that, Thanks for readding your edit back :), Thanks, – Davey 2010 Talk 14:51, 20 January 2019 (UTC)
 * I'm glad that (at least on this occasion!) I read you correctly.  Thanks for the confirmation.  Charles01 (talk) 14:56, 20 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 24
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tilly Spiegel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nancy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tilly_Spiegel check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tilly_Spiegel?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

Photo background
While I was categorising and sorting, this photo from one of your scans peaked my interest, not because of the car but the background and the people. That what I always like about your scans by taking pictures of cars of that time but inevitably catch a glimpse of what life was like in that time period. Things to point it out is how people were dressed and wondering the fate of them. The middle age chap as well as the parents with the child must be in their 70s today, the child in the pram would be around in it 40s but the elderly couple are likely left this world by now.

One of the many things I speculate about you ever since I joined Wikipedia is your age (I apologise if this is embarrassing or personal to you). Using your earliest photo from 1968, my guess is that you were in your 20s at the time and was born just after the war. I find history and past life like this fascinating but unless you want to keep this semi-ambiguous character to yourself then that's fair enough but it does mean my curiosity will continue to itch me overtime. --Vauxford (talk) 23:12, 26 January 2019 (UTC)


 * You just going to acknowledge what I said rather then responding? It was more of a question/discussion. --Vauxford (talk) 17:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)


 * Well, an acknowledgement felt more friendly than a steely silence.  But yes, I had intended to reply only after I'd thought what to write.   Maybe now I have.   We've just got back from visiting rellies which involved a splendid chilli con carne (is that how you spell it?) and a 400 mile round trip.   It's been a good day, but not strictly compatible with working on the wikipedia talk page.   So however old I am, I'm not so old that they've completely nailed me to my perch ....    But yes, I guess I'm probably several notches older than I think of you as being.   Then again, I find it impossible not to have a bit of an image of people n my mind when I exchange emails or wiki-messages or whatever.   But sometimes those images can be terribly wrong.   I was very surprised when your former partner in crime told us how young he was.   Then I clicked around his contributions and found he'd uploaded two pictures apparently of himself, and then I thought a bit more and then a bit more and, yes, it made sense that he was unusually (for a wiki-addict) young.   I had completely misjudged his age, without really meaning to try and judge it in the first place.


 * And as you get older you do indeed think more about time.  At least I do, though I'm not sure I am unreservedly flattered to be reminded that some of my earlier car pix look like historical records.    There aren't so many dimensions around that most people are programmed to understand (or think we understand) intuitively, but time is one of them.   I did indeed have a surge of something or other thinking that the little chap in the push chair passing the red Nissan must be around 39 by now.   He's had plenty of time to have become a father of ten in his own right.   Though I guess since infant mortality at our end of the planet went down so dramatically during the first half of the twentieth century, few people any longer feel the urge even to attempt to become fathers of ten.   And yes, on the subject of time I also sometimes catch myself wondering what happened to people in the backgrounds of car pictures and indeed sometimes wondering if they are even still alive.   None of us lasts for ever, though there's a bit of a taboo about mentioning it in public:   as you get older I think it's normal that you think more about death if only because you are likely to come across it more.   I guess the reduction in infant mortality may be part of that change too.   Children growing up in Victorian England couldn't avoid coming across death.    Now lots of kids - not all, but lots - manage to avoid serious bereavement till well into adulthood.   Sorry to be so cheerful.   But these are my thoughts right now, so I hope you will not mind that I share them before going to bed.  As to my own age, there are by now more than enough clues among my wiki contributions to pin it down pretty precisely, but you should probably have more important and more useful things to do.    I'm certainly MUCH too old to go in for all those late nights that so many wiki-contributors seem to favour.   Best wishes and sleep well.   Charles01 (talk) 21:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 9
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nicolas Lazarévitch, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jura ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nicolas_Lazar%C3%A9vitch check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nicolas_Lazar%C3%A9vitch?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Anarchism
Hi Charles01,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 18:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Thank for the contact. I really come to this stuff through the prism of translation.   My mother-tongue is English but I have a passing-friendly relationship with one or two other European languages as well.   These last few years I've been giving many of my wiki-hours to translating "potted biographies" to English.   It's a great way to fill in the gaps in my own education, and sometimes - sometimes quite unexpectedly - suddenly and seriously fascinating.   I tend to start with entries in German-language or French-language wikis because those two both have quite a lot of articles and I don't need to look up EVERY funny word in order to infer with reasonable confidence what the originator of the text intended.   These days I tend to select characters for treatment from my own lengthy list of red links.   I start with a random number based selection process, modified/massaged to ensure the selected translation candidates aren't ALL men (i.e. rather than women). Then I boot out the ones concerning folks for whom  I can't find a reasonable number of usable online sources and the ones I'm sure will send me to sleep.   Though often I find I have to be quite a long way through before I decide I've picked on a particularly interesting subject with lots of good sources and juicy factoids.   Or haven't.   I don't exactly have a particular interest in the anarchist-libertairan  movement, but it's certainly part of all our historical contexts - albeit more if you start with the world according to French-language wiki and it's underlying pre-wiki knowledge base (or Italian) than with German-language wiki.   And I don't think I am telling you or anyone anything you didn't already know with the observation that there's far more biographical information "out there" on those on (or beyond) the left of politics than on those on (or beyond) the right of politics.   Similar considerations seem to apply in arts, literature and academe and other wiki-prone categories.  Smarter folks than I have attempted to answer the question "why?".   Anyhow, that would be way beyond the scope of a casual wiki greeting.   But yes, thanks for getting in touch and I did manage a couple of pedantic improvements (or...?) on a couple of biographical articles which appear to be currently up for discussion along one of the links to which you kindly directed me.   May go back for a longer look around later.   Success Charles01 (talk) 20:38, 9 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:People from the canton of Vaud has been nominated for discussion
Category:People from the canton of Vaud, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Robby (talk) 03:03, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Many thanks


Hello Charles,

many thanks for improving my awful grammar and style. Your help is much appreciated. Please, don't hesitate to continue. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 09:41, 26 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Noted.  Thanks for the reaction.   I don't have time (nor technical expertise, nor access to your sources) for a massive overhaul of your interesting contribution.  Nor would you (or anyone else) necessarily thank me if I did.  But I do know English better than you do.   (I hope ... it is my Muttersprache!)  So with your encouragement, as here, I may indeed nibble away a bit more at some of the lumpier pieces of syntax over the next few days / weeks / years.   Success Charles01 (talk) 10:29, 26 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I will have a good look at it myself, too; there are several quirks that need an improvement. Best regards, --Johannes Maximilian (talk) 13:16, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

A beer for you!

 * And thank you for the thank you.  Nice picture of a mug of beer.   If only I had the metabolism to drink it without getting a headache....   Also please continue with the good contributions.   Please.   Success.  Charles01 (talk) 11:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aurus Senat, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bosch ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Aurus_Senat check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Aurus_Senat?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)