User talk:CharlesBluth

Speedy deletion nomination of MC SKULE


A tag has been placed on MC SKULE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 04:24, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of MC SKULE for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MC SKULE is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MC SKULE until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mr. MacTidy (talk) 16:25, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion on the article Rohan Shah but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. ansh 666 08:44, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited James Heckman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Rosenzweig ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/James_Heckman check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/James_Heckman?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 26 December 2018 (UTC)

Susan E. Mayer
Hello there, Please do not remove maintenance template without fixing the issue. Currently, the article is sourced only to primary sources. Apart from that "Career" section is totally sourceless. Regards. Hitro talk 10:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi user:hitroMilanese :) I had removed the tag only after a Washington Post article was added (in the first paragraph of the article). I also found a New York Times, which you can add it if you feel it is sufficient and then determine if the tag should be removed. Let me know: [//www.nytimes.com/2015/01/18/upshot/helping-the-poor-in-higher-education-the-power-of-a-simple-nudge.html NYT susan mayer link]

And not sure if [//en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bustle_(magazine) Bustle] counts as a credible news source but it showed up in Google News search results: [//www.bustle.com/articles/105699-what-your-parents-income-predicts-about-you-according-to-scientific-research bustle susan mayer link]


 * Hello CharlesBluth, these sources are fine, however, they still do not verify the content of "Career" section. Please add references to career section and then you can remove the template yourself. Per WP:V, all content must be verifiable. The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material, and is satisfied by providing an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the contribution. Other claims within the article are well sourced. Regards. Hitro talk 06:36, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Chuck Alkazian


A tag has been placed on Chuck Alkazian, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. (See section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
 * It appears to be about something made up, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Pillowdelight (talk) 09:23, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Chuck Alkazian for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuck Alkazian is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Chuck Alkazian until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Pillowdelight (talk) 17:20, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)