User talk:Charles Cummins

Welcome!
Hello, Charles Cummins, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Creationism does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  jmcgnh  (talk) (contribs)  12:36, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

March 2017
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Creation science has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Creation science was changed by Charles Cummins (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872371 on 2017-03-02T11:47:06+00:00.

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Creationism. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You need to use the talk page to get agreement on theses changes. Doug Weller  talk 15:28, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Creationism. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Robynthehode (talk) 18:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Robynthehode. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Creation Science have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Robynthehode (talk) 18:18, 2 March 2017 (UTC)