User talk:Charles Powers

AfD nomination of Daniel Glenn Holt
I have nominated Daniel Glenn Holt, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Daniel Glenn Holt. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Mayalld (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

Warning
Please don't remove deletion notice from the article: this is not allowed. - 7-bubёn >t 17:30, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

January 2009
Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mayalld (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Daniel Holt
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Daniel Holt, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * I think this is a hoax. There are no Ghits that can be traced to this Daniel Holt and most of the references are untraceable

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Porturology (talk) 11:51, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Repost of Daniel Holt
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article and put a note on the page's discussion page saying why this article should stay. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of continuing to recreate the page. Thank you. Porturology (talk) 11:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you.