User talk:Charles White

April 2014
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Octapharma", may not comply with our username policy. Please note that you may not use a username that represents the name of a company, group, organization, product, or website. Examples of usernames that are not allowed include "XYZ Company", "MyWidgetsUSA.com", and "Trammel Museum of Art". However, you are invited to use a username that contains such a name if it identifies you personally, such as "Mark at WidgetsUSA", "Jack Smith at the XY Foundation", and "WidgetFan87". Please also note that Wikipedia does not allow accounts to be shared by multiple people, and that you may not advocate for or promote any company, group, organization, product, or website, regardless of your username. Moreover, I recommend that you read our conflict of interest guideline. If you are a single individual and are willing to contribute to Wikipedia in an unbiased manner, please create a new account or request a username change that complies with our username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. Thank you. Jprg1966  (talk)  15:22, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Octapharma, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure

Please note
Per your remark on the Octapharma article talk page - the company site is NOT in the public domain. It is copyright to the company. It is accessible for reading by the public, but that does not mean it is public domain. PD is text or images that are copyright expired through age, or by being created by certain (usually US) government departments. Other things may be declared to be public domaion by their creator, or licensed under Creative Commons for free use. Your company site specifically has a copyright notice on it. I have not found any copying, but I only looked quickly. The text you used was promotional in our terms, as would be expected on a company site, so I would not be surprised to learn that it was copied. This is not allowed - sounding promotional or being copyright elsewhere - on Wikipedia. Peridon (talk) 18:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, Octapharma, does not meet our username policy. '''Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.''' A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:
 * Adding on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
 * At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
 * Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Peridon (talk) 18:01, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Unblocked. please do not block users with pending rename requests solely for their username. – xeno talk  19:05, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * As I had no way of knowing a request had been made, I did what I usually do when a username represents an organisation. It is uncommon in my experience for a request to be made without a block first. I used a softerblock instead of the spamuserblock as the promotional nature of their post wasn't as bad as most. Peridon (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
 * You should be reviewing the user's contributions prior to blocking them, as a block is not always indicated for usernames; per Username policy: "Users who adopt such usernames, but who are not editing problematically in related articles, should not be blocked. Instead, they should be gently encouraged to change their username." While you are checking their user contributions to ensure they are editing problematically in related articles, you should be able to determine if they have edited the Changing username pages. – xeno talk 19:28, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

An apology
for not knowing you were going for a name change. Looks like you've done a good job on redoing the article. Peridon (talk) 18:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)