User talk:Charles dye

Welcome
a bit late, but nonetheless:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Paul Cyr 19:46, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Casio F91W
I paid $25 CAD for the Casio F91W in the picture there.

Outwardly similar looking to your Image:DW5600c.png, but only water resistant. Do you mind if I ask how much you paid for yours?

Cheers! -- Geo Swan 22:51, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, but it's been so long, I can't even remember where I bought it, let alone how much I paid. $50? $60?  Lost in the mists in my head, I'm afraid.... Charles dye 14:31, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:4NT batch debugger.png
Thanks for uploading Image:4NT batch debugger.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 14:00, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of Casio DW-5600C for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Casio DW-5600C is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Casio DW-5600C until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 16:40, 12 January 2016 (UTC)