User talk:Charles teske

April 2020
Hello, I'm Driverofknowledge. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Driverofknowledge (talk) 00:31, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Driverofknowledge (talk) 00:33, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Viasat, Inc., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. This edit has been undone multiple times. JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 00:43, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 00:51, 15 April 2020 (UTC)

Yall are horrible now a corporate schill there site talked about there great customer exp thats vandilism they have a 1.1 rating with 700 google reviews just the fact they constantly have someone monitoring there page and have direct access to u shows how yall have abanded yalls mission statement i got welcome to wiki six min i got blocked for putting a true customer review in there are customers love us section u called it vandilism i call it yalls oringinal goal truth u got martin luther king on your facebook while your doing people like that its wrong ur wrong. Charles teske (talk) 10:15, 3 September 2020 (UTC)


 * Truth is subjective; we are not interested in original research, with what editors know or believe to be true. Wikipedia is interested in verifiability, not truth. Unless information has been previously published by a reliable independent source, and linked to with a citation, it cannot exist on Wikipedia. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 18:24, 4 September 2020 (UTC)