User talk:Charlesdrakew/Archives/2013/May

Fakenham
I was not advertising, just listing another attraction along with the farmers market, cinema, ten pin bowling. Craftypolly (talk) 22:27, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I have removed all of the above and asked for citations for a few other things. Not only are you advertising but you have a serious conflict of interest. If you continue this you are likely to be blocked from editing.--Charles (talk) 09:56, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Possible sockpuppet?
I think Josh 24 is back as User:DF2. His bus routes are appearing all over York articles again. I know you have already reverted one of his edits, but this time he is trying to disguise them among other small edits. Of course i could be wrong, but it does look suspicious.Rimmer1993 (talk) 22:11, 28 March 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes indeed. It does look very suspicious. I have already opened an SPI investigation into this account.--Charles (talk) 22:14, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Centrebus
Hello Charles, I know 3 links to there site isn't good but I don't see any other way (apart from it not being there at all)

I was hoping we could come to some sort of an agreement and perhaps leave it linking to there site ? I don't know ....

Kind Regards Davey 2010   Talk  21:12, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia does not do private agreements and external links are only allowed in the "External links" section and then only if they meet all the conditions at WP:EL.--Charles (talk) 21:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Well surely it's better than having a huge directory?, I feel the routes section should be there with the link, I agree it may not per rules but as above it's better than nothing (I think), Wikipedia does not do private agreements - (with all respect) Tough we are!, If we don't reach some sort of agreement it'll resort to Edit Warring which we don't want, I'm not saying lets do it my way or not all - I'm trying to well come to a balanced view ....  Davey 2010   Talk  21:29, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Threatening an edit war is unacceptable and edit warring will get you blocked. If you want to write a prose section describing the extent and general nature of the company's network that will be just great and what the article needs. You will then be able to use the company website as an inline reference.--Charles (talk) 08:24, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
 * I wasn't actually threatening, Anyway I'll try & write something up - Thanks for your input/help
 * Davey 2010  Talk  18:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

In regards to your recent response(s) on WP:RFD for "List of bus route"-related articles
Hi,

A recent discussion that you had participated in on Redirects for discussion regarding articles with "List of bus routes in..." has been relisted due to the amount of redundant requests submitted. This discussion has been centralized and has been posted at Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 April 4. You input regarding these redirects as a whole is welcomed. Steel1943 (talk) 02:33, 4 April 2013 (UTC)

scientific prove of God
I think the question of God's existance may be answered by scientific method. Thats what i'm currently writing in the talk page of existance of God. I think mathematical calculations of statistical probabilities could prove the existance. I'm trying to get the reasoning polished. Yet even at this stage i think its wrong to arbitrary say that science can prove or disapprove God's existance. At this point in time its simply undetermined. Ryanspir (talk) 19:03, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Save your time. Get a life instead.--Charles (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Danger! Danger! Step away from the vortex of lunacy or you may get sucked in.... --Bob Re-born (talk) 19:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
 * "I refuse to prove that I exist," says God, "for proof denies faith, and without faith I am nothing." Stuart.Jamieson (talk) 19:55, 9 April 2013 (UTC)